Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Beating the Fascists: The authorised history of Anti-Fascist Action

No..just a facemask and a well thumbed pack of Tarot cards.....


WHY DO WE NEED A MILITANT ANTI-FASCIST MOVEMENT?


Anti-fascism is fundamentally a rear-guard action, fascism and ultra-nationalism rear their heads where the left has failed. In a world where the majority are born into poverty or are asked to accept ever larger doses of 'austerity' a global elite grows stratospherically wealthy, with no borders or limits on their greed. In the UK we see the aggressive privatisation of public services, the introduction of workfare and the slashing of benefits. There is a concerted effort by a wealthy elite to reverse all the gains made by an organised working class in the last sixty years. Swathes of the population have no representation in mainstream politics.



Inevitably this makes people angry. The status quo is indefensible. The fascist's answer to this is to scapegoat immigrants and outsiders. Their position is just an echo of the agenda of those wielding real power. Watch as David Cameron introduces the most vicious attack on the rights of working people for a generation one day and the next announces that “Islamic extremism” is the greatest challenge we face as a nation. The message that immigration is the main problem facing society is rammed home daily by a handful of billionaire newspaper owners. Watch how the leadership of the far-right are invited onto Newsnight to express the views of the “white working class”.



This has created a reservoir of support for far-right politics, as witnessed by 4.5 million votes for UKIP at the last election. UKIP have hoovered up the BNPs electoral base and enlarged it. Where the BNP had an outline of what their economic and social policies were (the classic fascist mix of aggressive nationalism combined with socialistic economic policy), UKIP are far more nebulous – nobody really knows where they stand on the privatisation of the NHS for example, their appeal to the southern blue-blazer golf club set sits uneasily alongside their base among a northern white working class. It is not clear how well placed they are to fill the vacuum left by the retreat of Labour. The BNP itself has collapsed with the expulsion of Nick Griffin, their most successful leader, marking their march into oblivion.



Back in 1992 following sustained pressure from militant anti-fascists, the BNP announced a change in direction. Nick Griffin's announced that there would be “no more marches, no more punch-ups” and re-orientated the BNP in an electoral direction. Following this change of tack there was a virtual cessation of far-right street activity in the U.K. Under a hundred National Front members marching in Dover was a major event in the anti-fascist calendar.



That all changed in 2009 with the advent of the English Defence League. Cut from a different cloth than previous nationalist street movements, they were a single issue right wing campaign. They effectively attempted to import the tactics of the Orange March to mainland UK. The EDL are and were an online phenomenon, they don't aim for day to day 'control of the streets' but more the creation of a collective 'common sense', aided and abetted by the mainstream media. There were no public meetings or attempts to leaflet in small groups, let alone stand for election. As a single issue campaign there was never any attempt to outline any kind of social or economic ideas. Suddenly there were almost monthly manifestations of hundreds if not thousands of ultra-nationalists somewhere in the country.



Clearly the EDL had succeeded in mobilising a lot of angry people. Their propaganda tapped into the 'clash of civilisations' narrative pushed by the state due to the UK's involvement in Middle Eastern wars. It has been argued that they are and were a modern day “King & Country” mob. Demonstrations were specifically targetted at towns with large Muslim populations with the aim being a loud re-assertion of English values against those of the supposed alien invader. Many must have found attendance at an EDL demo an empowering experience.



The success of the EDL began to fuel a rise in Islamophobic attacks. It also, and this is of crucial importance, saw the beginning of attacks on the left – meetings disrupted, stalls attacked, known activists targeted at home and their places of work.



For the next five years autonomous groups of anti-fascists, generally of anarchist or leftist persuasion together with the more mainstream Socialist Worker Party backed Unite against Fascism (UAF) attempted to counter-act these demos. Where we were strong as a movement, i.e in towns with a large sub-cultural population e.g Brighton or Bristol or where the local community was able to muster numbers e.g Walthamstow, Tower Hamlets or Bradford the EDL were successfully confronted. A successful outcome for anti-fascists would be the EDL confined inside a police cordon besieged by anti-fascists. In many towns however the EDL demonstration outnumbered anti-fascist counter demonstrators.



In the last two years the EDL have been shrinking, although it is always worth remembering that such a loose organisation has the capacity to regenerate alarmingly quickly under the right circumstances. What has happened though is that they have paved the way for other groups. A gaggle of far-right groups have gained confidence from the EDL experience. Some, like Britain First have characterised themselves as UKIPs street army, others like National Action and the National Front are of more obvious neo-Nazi bent. There are many 'footsoldiers' who flit between the two poles. All of them gain confidence whenever they able to mobilise on the streets.



The rise of the EDL showed that there is the capacity for a large scale right wing street movement in the U.K. At the moment the far-right is in disarray but is still sustaining a level of activity that would have been shocking ten years ago. This is not alarmist – tackled properly they can be successfully confronted.

Not sure what this is offering the ' man and woman in the street' you were saying that you wanted to appeal to?
 
Not sure what this is offering the ' man and woman in the street' you were saying that you wanted to appeal to?

Just trying to explain why a anti-fascist movement is needed at all. Trying to avoid jargon. It's really aimed at people who are broadly affiliated to the left or 'progressive' movements in the first place. I'm not saying that anti-fascism (or fascism) are going to be anyone's first point of contact if you were cold-calling strangers.

It's actually the draft text of a leaflet from two years ago that happened to be sitting around when butchersapron challenged me.
 
Last edited:
It's really aimed at people who are broadly affiliated to the left or 'progressive' movements in the first place. I'm not saying that anti-fascism (or fascism) are going to be anyone's first point of contact if you were cold-calling strangers.

So not aimed at the 'man and the women on the street' then but those already politically active?
 
You said it was aimed at the 'man and women on the street' initially but later that it was aimed at those already politically actIve which, as you know, isn't the same thing. It

Re-read what I actually wrote. I like to think there's some overlap at least between ordinary people and the politically active though. The occasionally politically active.

While you're at it could you explain what ""my god the state is what the /c does. My god" means? Genuinely mystified.
 
Fwiw I would have been genuinely interested in what you had to say in response to butchersapron's er robust challenge, Red Sky*. Is there more to what you're doing? I mean, what's the step beyond the direct confrontation? (Which I applaud you for btw). Or is that not what you're about?



*And if there's a whole load of backstory between you and him then fair enough; dunno if I'm stepping into ongoing haaaaandbags.
 
Fwiw I would have been genuinely interested in what you had to say in response to butchersapron's er robust challenge,

I'd be genuinely interested to know what his robust challenge actually means! There is no back story (there might be one hastily ret-conned in by Season 3 but there isn't now).
 
This bit:

He doesn't know I'm not doing it. He's just straw manning me. He doesn't (as far as I'm aware) know who I am or what I do. My original point was that the Thurrock Heckler guy was presenting community politics and counter demos as somehow mutually exclusive (We didn't go to Dover etc ). They needn't be.
 
P.S I love the fact that my 'distance from such concerns is noted' - I definitley felt a chill as I realised that I was now on butchersaprons hitlist.
 
Last edited:
He doesn't know I'm not doing it. He's just straw manning me. He doesn't (as far as I'm aware) know who I am or what I do. My original point was that the Thurrock Heckler guy was presenting community politics and counter demos as somehow mutually exclusive (We didn't go to Dover etc ). They needn't be.
Fair enough. I thought he was looking for depth, like I said; the politics beyond the punch ups. Fuck knows I wouldn't want to speak for him though; just how I read it.
P.S I love the fact that my 'distance from distance such concerns is noted' - I definitley felt a chill as I realised that I was now on butchersaprons hitlist.
Sounded like he was writing you off as a political lightweight rather than any kind of threat. Shitlist rather than hitlist. :D He can be a gnomic bleeder though so who knows?



eta - though having reread my post, it sounds like I care about the handbags - I was just interested to see what you had to say in answer to the question I thought was being asked.
 
Last edited:
He doesn't know I'm not doing it. He's just straw manning me. He doesn't (as far as I'm aware) know who I am or what I do. My original point was that the Thurrock Heckler guy was presenting community politics and counter demos as somehow mutually exclusive (We didn't go to Dover etc ). They needn't be.
Odd this, given your definitive statement on my wallflower nature. You no longer sound so sure.
 
Your really need telling? A definitive claim about me from you pretending to know who i am and what i've done - that happened. You whining that people might make such claims about you (i didn't btw) you think is a terrible thing.

Be honest. You wanted to have a pop at some wet behind the ears 'antifa' kid and crush them beneath the weight of your intellectual and theoretical superiority. It didn't work out. Pathetic.
 
Be honest. You wanted to have a pop at some wet behind the ears 'antifa' kid and crush them beneath the weight of your intellectual and theoretical superiority. It didn't work out. Pathetic.
That would have been cracking - i got better, a real experienced old hand talking shit. You got mugged by yourself and some twat on the some silly other forum too.
 
It means that the state is the result of class struggle. I meant w/c. You know this - don't you?

I honestly didn't have a fucking clue what you were on about. "The state is the result of class struggle" - is that what you think or what you think I think?
 
Back
Top Bottom