One point on that mate is that Militant were the masters of telling people what they wanted to hear. They wanted to cultivate a relationship with Searchlight at that time and bent over backwards to accommodate you. Tommy could charm the pants off anyone, male of female
but he was an actor playing a part. You only have to read Alan McCombes' recent book on him to understand the amount of manipulation that went on. Alan has had a bit of a Damascian conversion himself, considering the behind the scenes role that he played in all of it. If Tommy was the monster, Alan was the Dr Frankenstein who created him.
Behind that charm offensive was a cynical ploy to outmanoeuvre their rivals on the left.
I remember them presenting that wee gang of urchins from Pollock at various events and thought, 'Fuck me, you lads don't know what they're getting you into..." On mobilisations those kids were told not to talk to us, it was insane. One of our lads was talking to one of the Pollock Bushwacker gang at some lefty demo and McNeilage walked over and without a word and not knowing what the conversation was about, he aggressively pulled the kid away. They feared that their rawest working class members might actually find that they had more in common with us than they had been led to believe, so the answer was to tell them horror stories about us all being 'sectarian bigots' and 'IRA'.
You got the charm offensive, but those of us on the ground in Glasgow saw the real face of an organisation that were once described by another Red Action wag as being
"the sectarian's sectarians".
Here's one example and I hope Fed doesn't mind me using it. When Fed first came to Glasgow he was obviously given the Militant line on me as a 'traitor' to their organisation, because I had once been a member and had now taken a different political path. Militant could not tolerate ex-members who stayed politically active. If you resigned or left the organisation you were generally encouraged to remain inactive. Those who didn't lay down and die and who took an opposing view to theirs were vilified and their characters assassinated in the good old Stalinist tradition. Fed had come up from England and had a different approach,
he became friendly with a couple of our members on the Southside. Unfortunately he also repeated stuff about me that was pure lies and straight out of the mouths of people like McCombes and Sheridan. He wasn't to know, he took the leadership of Militant in Glasgow at face value and considered them to be politically honest. As a result of that our lads didn't develop a political relationship with someone that in hindsight we should have worked with and who would have been an asset to any anti-fascist organisation.
It wasn't until years later in 1997 at the General Election count that me and Fed actually had a face-to-face conversation. To their credit (and as a result of them being under pressure from the fash inside the count) McCombes and other Millies organised to get AFA into the count. As we were milling around considering our options, Fed came over to me and said, "S, you probably hate me but I'm up for it and if youse are going to get into them there's some of us who'll go for it with you..."
My reply, as I recall it, was, "Mate, I don't know you well enough to hate you and I don't give a fcuk about all that shite, let's get into them..." And we did!
But that one simple event brought home to me how many more we could have worked with, should have worked with, but were thwarted from doing so by the sectarian poison of their political leaders. I am also not saying that we were always right and never at fault for any of the bad feeling between organsations, but in my experience when people actually came together and fought the fascists as one the artificial political barriers that existed between us were almost always lifted, regardless of what the political gurus of the SWP and MIlitant might want.