Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth

True, uplands-wise. There's a lot more potential elsewhere. The money is in meat at the moment.
So if I had some grade one or two land, I'd use it for grazing animals on? Don't talk bollocks.

Edited to add; it might happen (I really doubt it though, economies of scale and all that) if milling wheat continues to be cheap - currently recovering at £168/tonne and with this wet summer, I imagine it'll be dear next year (unless we have a glorious August)
 
Last edited:
So if I had some grade one or two land, I'd use it for grazing animals on? Don't talk bollocks.
This seems to be the sticking point for a lot of people. They argue about things they know little or nothing about. They seem to think that all land is equal, and that the same land used to grow cattle and sheep can be used to grow crops for human consumption.
 
This seems to be the sticking point for a lot of people. They argue about things they know little or nothing about. They seem to think that all land is equal, and that the same land used to grow cattle and sheep can be used to grow crops for human consumption.
Yeah, I make this point over and over again - these generalised studies (which are now starting to be debunked anyway (see my links to the Stirling paper and the silviculture experiment), have used maths, but refined it to the point whereby geography is ignored.
Land is not homogenous - there's a reason we traditionally imported our milling wheat from Canada and North America (who put prarie under the plough, killing thousands of wild ruminants in the process and rendering the habitat unsuitable for them)
 
For me, the problem is in large part that there is a concentration on the worst forms of farming. We all agree that those need to change, for many different reasons, including animal welfare. But there are examples of good practice that involve mixed farming. The expression of the problem implicit in the OP is not a good way to frame it. It sets up false dichotomies - animal or arable - when an answer is very often 'both'.
 
For me, the problem is in large part that there is a concentration on the worst forms of farming. We all agree that those need to change, for many different reasons, including animal welfare. But there are examples of good practice that involve mixed farming. The expression of the problem implicit in the OP is not a good way to frame it. It sets up false dichotomies - animal or arable - when an answer is very often 'both'.
Only if your farm has suitable cropping land, which many in the UK don't. Then the answer is livestock, but the key is how you manage them.
 
Yeah, I make this point over and over again - these generalised studies (which are now starting to be debunked anyway (see my links to the Stirling paper and the silviculture experiment), have used maths, but refined it to the point whereby geography is ignored.
Land is not homogenous - there's a reason we traditionally imported our milling wheat from Canada and North America (who put prarie under the plough, killing thousands of wild ruminants in the process and rendering the habitat unsuitable for them)
A neighbour of my father grows milling wheat. His land was excellent to start with but it took him years to make it suitable to grow wheat, and costs him a lot to keep it that way. His immediate neighbour grows sheep, because his land isn't even fit for cattle, as it's full of rocks at the top of the hill and a veritable bog at the bottom.
 
A neighbour of my father grows milling wheat. His land was excellent to start with but it took him years to make it suitable to grow wheat, and costs him a lot to keep it that way. His immediate neighbour grows sheep, because his land isn't even fit for cattle, as it's full of rocks at the top of the hill and a veritable bog at the bottom.
"Grows sheep"?? :facepalm:
Clearly you just see animals as just another product, pretending to give a fuck about the welfare standards
 
So if I had some grade one or two land, I'd use it for grazing animals on? Don't talk bollocks.

Edited to add; it might happen (I really doubt it though, economies of scale and all that) if milling wheat continues to be cheap - currently recovering at £168/tonne and with this wet summer, I imagine it'll be dear next year (unless we have a glorious August)
Just saying there is more scope for growing alternatives in non upland areas. No bollocks here 😁.
 
Just saying there is more scope for growing alternatives in non upland areas. No bollocks here 😁.
Well there's horticulture, but by and large that's quite shit, environmentally (there are, of course exceptions) - the agronomist I work with who is pretty eco-conscious thinks growing potatoes should be banned wholesale.
 
"Grows sheep"?? :facepalm:
Clearly you just see animals as just another product, pretending to give a fuck about the welfare standards
Farmers grow things, be they animals or plants. Although for a different perspective, I (and quite a few sheep farmers) considered that I farmed grass when I had them, the sheep grew themselves if I managed the grass right.
 
It's all going a bit

250
 
They breed them and feed them, the sheep grow themselves :facepalm:
Is this the sum total of your efforts on this thread, putting laughing smileys on people's posts and arguing over the semantics of growing food?
Do yourself a favour. Have a look back through all of your posts on this thread, then ask yourself if any of those posts has added anything of worth to the thread.
 
Is this the sum total of your efforts on this thread, putting laughing smileys on people's posts and arguing over the semantics of growing food?
Do yourself a favour. Have a look back through all of your posts on this thread, then ask yourself if any of those posts has added anything of worth to the thread.
It was a response to your smiley you stupid prick
You've done that more than most on this thread too
 
It was a response to your smiley you stupid prick
You've done that more than most on this thread too
No, you put a laughing smiley on two of my posts, without explaining why you were laughing, so I went back and put the same smiley on about 10 of your posts, to give you a clue how ridiculous it was, but let's address the lack of content in all of your posts. Apart from snide digs and smileys, what else have you contributed?
 
No, you put a laughing smiley on two of my posts, without explaining why you were laughing, so I went back and put the same smiley on about 10 of your posts, to give you a clue how ridiculous it was, but let's address the lack of content in all of your posts. Apart from snide digs and smileys, what else have you contributed?
Grow the fuck up
 
I really do like discussing alternatives to factory farming, as I believe it's wrong in every way. I'd love to be able to discuss ways to make all farming better, but some people only seem to want to troll these threads, which results in nobody wanting to take part in them, because they will ultimately be faced with the "murdering bastard rape juice sexual assault kidnapper" trope.
 
That doesn't a lot of sense. From table 2 it claims an egg laying chicken has a water footprint of 33m^3 of water per year. That's 33,000 L per year or 90L per day = ~20 gallons per day not the 53 you quote.

From www.yourchickens.co.uk
"The average laying bird will drink up to 500ml of water a day" so you still need to account for 89.5L

"As a very rough guide, an average chicken will eat around 120-150 grams of food a day"
Do you really think it takes 89.5L of water to grow 150g of wheat? :D
 
That doesn't a lot of sense. From table 2 it claims an egg laying chicken has a water footprint of 33m^3 of water per year. That's 33,000 L per year or 90L per day = ~20 gallons per day not the 53 you quote.

From www.yourchickens.co.uk
"The average laying bird will drink up to 500ml of water a day" so you still need to account for 89.5L

"As a very rough guide, an average chicken will eat around 120-150 grams of food a day"
Do you really think it takes 89.5L of water to grow 150g of wheat? :D
This table agrees with the higher figure.

According to its figures, it takes between around 80 and 600 litres of water to grow 150g of wheat.

fwiw I see changing 150g of wheat into one egg as a decent trade-off.
 
That doesn't a lot of sense. From table 2 it claims an egg laying chicken has a water footprint of 33m^3 of water per year. That's 33,000 L per year or 90L per day = ~20 gallons per day not the 53 you quote.

From www.yourchickens.co.uk
"The average laying bird will drink up to 500ml of water a day" so you still need to account for 89.5L

"As a very rough guide, an average chicken will eat around 120-150 grams of food a day"
Do you really think it takes 89.5L of water to grow 150g of wheat? :D
I don't think those figures would be too far off, tbh. You might also be shocked to hear that the average human uses about 3000 litres of fresh water a day.
 
Last edited:
That water is rain so shouldn't count. It's not as though we're taking it out of reservoirs to water the fields.
Well this is all about context, isn't it? Is the farming sustainable? Is there enough water in dry periods? Water cycles around - that's what it does - and in some places fresh water is plentiful while in others it is a precious resource. Water supplies and rights are going to be an increasingly hot political topic around the world in the future - are already, look at Palestine/Israel, look at California.
 
Well this is all about context, isn't it? Is the farming sustainable? Is there enough water in dry periods? Water cycles around - that's what it does - and in some places fresh water is plentiful while in others it is a precious resource. Water supplies and rights are going to be an increasingly hot political topic around the world in the future - are already, look at Palestine/Israel, look at California.
Which is why you should grow crops according to the conditions. You don't grow stuff that needs lots of water in a desert just as don't grow stuff that needs dry conditions in boggy ground.
 
Back
Top Bottom