Distraction from the class struggle, comrade.And why the fuck (now that I'm really annoyed again) should abuse of power manifesting in e.g. sexual assault be a feminist/equality/identity politics issue?
Identity politics tries to break all kinds of factors down into tidy little single issues, with identities attached. Maybe the left just bolted on this array or issues, instead of really integrating them into the mainstream of its politics? Rather like the way state-sponsored "multiculturalism" actually divides people and undermines antiracism?And why the fuck (now that I'm really annoyed again) should abuse of power manifesting in e.g. sexual assault be a feminist/equality/identity politics issue?
but you haven't said whether the allegations against you stood up to examination.I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
Without knowing whether you raped someone or not, it's difficult to say.I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
No, don't be silly.I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
you are austen donellan and i claim my £5I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
Identity politics tries to break all kinds of factors down into tidy little single issues, with identities attached. Maybe the left just bolted on this array or issues, instead of really integrating them into the mainstream of its politics? Rather like the way state-sponsored "multiculturalism" actually divides people and undermines antiracism?
I've denied rape allegations made against me. Does that make me a rape denialist? Or perhaps a rape apologist?
Didn't go to trial. Obviously the women involved were too frightened to pursue it.Have you had the trial yet?
Which goes back to my point about the left having difficulty integrating "identity politics" into its raison d'etre.
You're not actually this stupid, so why are you pretending to be?Didn't go to trial. Obviously the women involved were too frightened to pursue it.
I have also on a few occasions penetrated a sleeping woman. On none of those occasions were rape allegations made. I too have been woken by a mouth round my cock. Sexual assault surely?
Didn't go to trial. Obviously the women involved were too frightened to pursue it.
I have also on a few occasions penetrated a sleeping woman. On none of those occasions were rape allegations made. I too have been woken by a mouth round my cock. Sexual assault surely?
Surely even denying the accusation was attacking the integrity of the claimant? And denying it to nutty feminists was doing it publicly.And that you didnt first attack the integrity of the claimants publicly,
You mean not stupid enough to do it or not stupid enough to admit it?You're not actually this stupid, so why are you pretending to be?
I was at another one. Lot more fun.We did this two days ago. Did you miss the party?
not stupid enough to know your argument is completely specious and nothing to do with the actual issueYou mean not stupid enough to do it or not stupid enough to admit it?
Surely even denying the accusation was attacking the integrity of the claimant? And denying it to nutty feminists was doing it publicly.
Yes. The issue of egalitarianism in terms of gender is cross platform. So to speak.Because identity politics campaigners aren't necessarily left wing. Someone campaigning for gay rights can as easily be a conservative voter as a socialist.
Yes. The issue of egalitarianism in terms of gender is cross platform. So to speak.
That's because there are people who want equality of one sort, but not of another. Socialism has the ambition to bring about total equality. I hope.The left have to view it through the prism of class. And this won't suit feminists who want to challenge gender equality but are happy with the status quo with regards to the class system.
That's because there are people who want equality of one sort, but not of another. Socialism has the ambition to bring about total equality. I hope.
No, sorry but that's just nonsense. The socialist aspect of the USSR drove the whole Russian Empire in a far more sexually equal direction, with a legacy of women in work that remains in some former-Communist countries. it's true that many versions of socialism have compromised and accepted certain forms of inequality, but that's not because of socialism''s aspirations, but in spite of it.Hasn't historically, though. I think the Soviet Union was a pretty sexist society, by most accounts. Of course it can be argued that it wasn't socialism proper either.
The left have to view it through the prism of class, but somehow remain mindful that their prism is constructed within a patriarchal society.The left have to view it through the prism of class. And this won't suit feminists who want to challenge gender equality but are happy with the status quo with regards to the class system.