Random
Ethnic nalgocrat
Good article on LibCoM btw http://libcom.org/blog/enemy-my-enemy-notes-not-having-really-shit-politics-22082012
If you keep on with the single-sentence posts on this it's hard for me to engage. I have to second-guess what you actually mean, and reply to that.
Thanks. I don't see how your edit adds much. Feminism and equality politics isn't just about women. The response of dismissing the rape allegations has shown just how shallowly-seated feminism and equality are as part of some left politics.Earlier, I edited to add a second sentence to the post of mine that you took issue with, and (afaik) misrepresented. There are two problems that I personally find with your analysis (1) the implication that the UK's response to JA's behaviour is nothing more than kowtowing to the US; and (2) that the response to allegations of rape boil down to politics.
Thanks. I don't see how your edit adds much. Feminism and equality politics isn't just about women. The response of dismissing the rape allegations has shown just how shallowly-seated feminism and equality are as part of some left politics.
As for the UK, its ruling class certainly is playing up to show just how loyal they are to the USA. But this isn't merely a response to the US. The fact is that the UK and US ruling classes have convergent interests, so the UK both defends its own system and also at the same time strengthens its own position in the transatlantic special relationship.
Having said that, I have no special insight in this, unlike my posts on Sweden. I'm simply going on what I already know about the UK and about the "anti-imperialists". As Butchers already said, many of them already have blood on their hands.
I'm not sure what this means. Can you rephrase it? Are you saying something similar to what I said earlier, about how this issues has smoked some people out?However I see the response of dismissing the rape allegations, as not merely a criticism of the shallow-seated ness of left politics but of people (of whatever political persuasion) that still hold views which amount to rape apology.
I'm not sure what this means. Can you rephrase it? Are you saying something similar to what I said earlier, about how this issues has smoked some people out?
Again, it's very very hard to work out what you meant. As a bland and blanket respons I'll just say that I have very few expectations that anyone on the right or in the centre will have vaguely sound views at all.I think it's smoked some people out, but those smoked-out people aren't limited to those on the left (because it's possible to be on the right, or in the centre and not hold views amounting to rape apology).
sounds to me like you see the right and centre as fairly monolithick and not - as t.j. hooker would have said - containing a million shades of grey.Again, it's very very hard to work out what you meant. As a bland and blanket respons I'll just say that I have very few expectations that anyone on the right or in the centre will have vaguely sound views at all.
I think they are monolithickally not worth me wasting my time over. Most people are not signed up to any political ideology. I've better things to do than engage with tories and lib dems.sounds to me like you see the right and centre as fairly monolithick and not - as t.j. hooker would have said - containing a million shades of grey.
like?I think they are monolithickally not worth me wasting my time over. Most people are not signed up to any political ideology. I've better things to do than engage with tories and lib dems.
Again, it's very very hard to work out what you meant. As a bland and blanket respons I'll just say that I have very few expectations that anyone on the right or in the centre will have vaguely sound views at all.
I think they are monolithickally not worth me wasting my time over. Most people are not signed up to any political ideology. I've better things to do than engage with tories and lib dems.
Eating cakelike?
I don't agree. Leftism is about egalitarianism or it's about nothing, and that has to include sexual/gender egalitarianism, or it's worthless.I don't know many people on the right, but there's plenty that I know on the centre. Some of their views are sound, and others not. However, I feel as "wtf" about rape apology from those where I hear it from the centre as I do from those on the left. I don't think the left should be under any illusion that they are less likely to have rape apologists within their number.
Mostly I'm talking about public political figures, rather than people I meet in everyday life. Crusty dyed in the wool tories and lib dems are not something I'm interested in. Crusty lefties, however, should know better. And left leaders can poison whole movements/campaigns by coming out with this sort of crap. I'm very impressed that Salma Yacqoob has openly ticked Galloway off. Aren't they the two main people in Respect?Plenty of Tories and LibDems In the WC.
In theory, yes. In practice, that's not how it plays out as evidenced by this Assange mess. It's exactly this kind of "oh noes, a member of the left is a rape apologist which should only happen amongst the politically unaligned, the centre and the right, yuk" that leaves me scratching my head and joining forces with LLETSA.I don't agree. Leftism is about egalitarianism or it's about nothing, and that has to include sexual/gender egalitarianism, or it's worthless.
Mostly I'm talking about public political figures, rather than people I meet in everyday life. Crusty dyed in the wool tories and lib dems are not something I'm interested in. Crusty lefties, however, should know better. And left leaders can poison whole movements/campaigns by coming out with this sort of crap. I'm very impressed that Salma Yacqoob has openly ticked Galloway off. Aren't they the two main people in Respect?
Got a new alarm clock. The ring is George Galloway's voice saying "Sshh..Go back to sleep". I'm dressed and out the door before it goes off.
What idiotic comments? May have simply blanked them, but seemed fine.In theory, yes. In practice, that's not how it plays out as evidenced by this Assange mess. It's exactly this kind of "oh noes, a member of the left is a rape apologist which should only happen amongst the politically unaligned, the centre and the right, yuk" that leaves me scratching my head and joining forces with LLETSA.
Edit: and the comments on that Libcom article you linked to show you the variety of idiots that you get on the left as well.
No one I meet here in Sweden supports Assange's arguments about not being extradited at all. So I only do this kind of argument on the net.Well, mostly I'm talking about people I meet in everyday life.
eh? One of the main problems for the left has been a total acquiescence to such identity politics. That a small number of 'leading' lefties (lets ignore the shouting eejits on the internet) are coming out with utterly despicable 'defences' of Assange doesn't change that.The politics of the left appears not to have had to face the politics of identity, gender, sex and freedom for a while. And now that it is, there's an awful lot of completeand utter shites being revealed.
It certainly should be. However -- as you're probably aware -- there have been two or three of occasions in the past few months where "the left" has attempted to deal with the shitty attitudes to women of some in its ranks. The link below is one example:I don't agree. Leftism is about egalitarianism or it's about nothing.
One of the main problems for the left has been the inability to integrate "identity politics" into its raison d'etre.eh? One of the main problems for the left has been a total acquiescence to such identity politics. That a small number of 'leading' lefties (lets ignore the shouting eejits on the internet) are coming out with utterly despicable 'defences' of Assange doesn't change that.