Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Art that people rave about that's actually shit.

I stopped posting on Art forums a few years back as they were dominated by people denouncing conceptual art (usually lumping Abstract art in with it) bemoaning the "low status" of representational art in the art world and endlessly championing fine motor skills as the sole denominator of "good art".

This thread has reminded far too much of that.

Should I ecpect to hear a swish as you leave the thread with your hand dramatically touching your brow?
 
Lol
I know exactly what you mean.
I just don't happen to agree with you.
For the very reason that the art world exalts a tin of shit.

"Grumble, grumble...kids these days with their long hair and their tins of shit" "I thought I told you to get offa my lawn!"

Grumpy-old-man.jpg
 
I stopped posting on Art forums a few years back as they were dominated by people denouncing conceptual art (usually lumping Abstract art in with it) bemoaning the "low status" of representational art in the art world and endlessly championing fine motor skills as the sole denominator of "good art".

This thread has reminded far too much of that.

The Internet joys of people posting definitive opinion about subjective subject matter.

In a nutshell your music / art / sport choices are wrong because they differ from mine.
 
well, bubblesmcgrath you've done it! You've successfully made us aware that some art actually consists of shit, and that this method of creating is a thing that is done sometimes by a small number of people in order to make a statement and that you find this very silly. Congratulations!
 
I think he meant that's what is wrong with this thread and the people on your art forums declaring something to be "good art" ..took me a second too.

It's more likely he meant that people are entitled to their opinions without being told they're wromg to hold them.
You've persisted in telling me .. explaining to me..(in a patronising way) that art ..all art has to be respected.
I like all sorts of art but you decided I was anti modern art. Where you got that idea I do not know. I like what I like regardless of it's age, style or it's creator. But nobody will ever convince me that a tin of shit is high art. No context..no story..no bull will ever convince me that a painting using the artist's semen is fascinatingly brilliant. ..please understand this?
 
It's more likely he meant that people are entitled to their opinions without being told they're wromg to hold them.
You've persisted in telling me .. explaining to me..(in a patronising way) that art ..all art has to be respected.
I like all sorts of art but you decided I was anti modern art. Where you got that idea I do not know. I like what I like regardless of it's age, style or it's creator. But nobody will ever convince me that a tin of shit is high art. No context..no story..no bull will ever convince me that a painting using the artist's semen is fascinatingly brilliant. ..please understand this?
you say you like all sorts of art. so you like shit art as well as decent art. what sorts of shit art do you like?
 
It's more likely he meant that people are entitled to their opinions without being told they're wromg to hold them.
You've persisted in telling me .. explaining to me..(in a patronising way) that art ..all art has to be respected.
I like all sorts of art but you decided I was anti modern art. Where you got that idea I do not know. I like what I like regardless of it's age, style or it's creator. But nobody will ever convince me that a tin of shit is high art. No context..no story..no bull will ever convince me that a painting using the artist's semen is fascinatingly brilliant. ..please understand this?

1. I never said all art needs to be respected. My main point was it hurts art and artists as a whole to perpetuate negative associations with certain forms of art, and this thread pretty much is a celebration of those negative associations and stereotypes (in the way you intended it). I said that art should be celebrated, and that we should encourage participation...not for artwork you don't like obviously, that would be odd, but for the artwork you DO like...i.e. focus on the positive rather than the negative.

2. see above post. to elaborate, you're focusing on the extreme edge of conceptual art, to prove some sort of point that's been done to death already, and which nobody cares to keep rehashing, mmkay?
 
Of course I enjoy verbally kicking the shit out of him.....he wears stripey socks and has an allergy to giving sweets to children who are related to him.... :p
Now it appears the boring old fart doesn't even own the orangutan t -shirt....:rolleyes:

Anyway. ..here's more shit art that's actually shit :D
excrement-sculpture3.jpg

Venus De Milo ...Zhu Cheng

:D
You don't really have any right to bring up stuff from other threads. And you certainly don't have any right to accuse other people as nasty pieces of work when you make posts like that.
 
1. I never said all art needs to be respected. My main point was it hurts art and artists as a whole to perpetuate negative associations with certain forms of art, and this thread pretty much is a celebration of those negative associations and stereotypes (in the way you intended it). I said that art should be celebrated, and that we should encourage participation...not for artwork you don't like obviously, that would be odd, but for the artwork you DO like...i.e. focus on the positive rather than the negative.

2. see above post. to elaborate, you're focusing on the extreme edge of conceptual art, to prove some sort of point that's been done to death already, and which nobody cares to keep rehashing, mmkay?

Dear me...I think you're confusing the discussion with some point scoring nonsense.
Where have I personally hurt any artist or the "arts" ? I've posted some of the best examples of excellent art the last century offered....and a few from this century.
 
You don't really have any right to bring up stuff from other threads. And you certainly don't have any right to accuse other people as nasty pieces of work when you make posts like that.

Ah now come on...ou...fair is fair..
I was being tongue in cheek.

Don't deny that a fair few of your comments to me were not said in jest. They were nasty.
 
Ah now come on...ou...fair is fair..
I was being tongue in cheek.

Don't deny that a fair few of your comments to me were not said in jest. They were nasty.
I'm sorry but they were mostly earnest insults, hardly nasty.
I just don't see what I wear has to do with anything on this thread. And you seem to have fictional ideas about me.
 
Dear me...I think you're confusing the discussion with some point scoring nonsense.
Where have I personally hurt any artist or the "arts" ? I've posted some of the best examples of excellent art the last century offered....and a few from this century.

If you could look outside of yourself (because it's not about you) and put your need to save face aside, you would see that I'm actually being sincere, as is everyone else.
And why do you keep asking me to explain what I've just explained. I told you precisely why this type of thing hurts art/ artists about 12 times now :confused:
 
If you could look outside of yourself (because it's not about you) and put your need to save face aside, you would see that I'm actually being sincere, as is everyone else.
And why do you keep asking me to explain what I've just explained. I told you precisely why this type of thing hurts art/ artists about 12 times now :confused:

I've not asked you to explain.
You just keep choosing to do so despite being told that it's not necessary.
 
Back
Top Bottom