Pretty much all of Jack Vettrianos work if you listen to people who claim to know about art. Its popular, sells in its thousands but is it actually any good.
I like it btw.
Fair play. A lot of people do, a lot of people dont. It is hugely simplistic & he cant do eyes or hands very well but it is hugely popular. We went to his exhibition at the Kelvingrove Art Gallery in January & it was jammed. I think its a perfect example of the thread title.I really don't like it.
...but haven't investigated it beyond my initial dislike. I accidentally went to an exhibition of his work. Really not my thing.
But there you go.
Pretty much all of Jack Vettrianos work if you listen to people who claim to know about art. Its popular, sells in its thousands but is it actually any good.
I like it btw.
Vettriano famously uses stock image catalogues instead of models and it shows, to me his figures look incredibly wooden. But if people like stuff like that then I'd never call it rubbish. It's simple, undemanding and a bit quirky - it's pop really.
Abstract painting is hard.
No..it's not that it was hard..it's just there was no light relief at all as it went on. It was draining and by the time it was "finished" (not sure it is), I was starving.
Anyway. ..... I'm going to try another with a brighter palate today. The telly died last night and I've no new books so it'll be a day of painting.
I'm thinking pinks yellows and whites for today.
What was the point of that exercise?
Well, it sounds hard from your postings!
What was the point of that exercise?
What was the point of that exercise?
Right then you bag of cunts. I'm gonna paint a Rothko.
I have an unused canvas sat in my living room and some paints and an easel (kindly donated by two lovely Urbz) and I've been wondering wtf to paint for ages.
I haven't painted for about 15 years and I was never any good anyway.
But by the end of the week I'm gonna present my £75m painting. No bother
watch out or you'll get an abusive pmWhat was the point of that exercise?
There was nothing hard about any of the work involved. A realist landscape would be "harder" , as in more technically difficult. I spend on average 90 hours on a landscspe of similar size. The Rothko homage was just not as enjoyable to paint...and that's my personal experience and perspective.
Fair enough.
My point I guess is that there's more to the difficulty or "hardness" of painting than technique (or fine motor skills). Y'know all the other, less tangible, stuff that the artist puts into making a work succeed.
I hope you would agree that your Rothko homage isn't a particularly successful piece of Art?
Are you trying to say that's as good as a Rothko?
Are you trying to say that's as good as a Rothko?
For me, the colours and sizes of the rectangles are wrong. It's not easy.
You type those words but you don't know what they meanLol.... irony is lost on you.
You type those words but you don't know what they mean
I wish I'd thought of it first but unfortunately not. I found it via Google.That's brilliantly funny Dr Herbz
Your own work?