Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Jones - Two Stops Past Barking?

I didn't hear that bit properly but I'd assumed they'd said the lawyers didn't say anything like that the records were sent in confidence when they sent them, which is why they could use them.

Eta: yes it was "when informed did not take any steps to identify it as privileged ... " fuck me that's incompetent or worse (better, rather :) ). I'd have thought it would be a bit late trying to say it was privileged after they'd sent it.
They sent the records by accident. And when informed of this by the prosecution they decided not to deem them as sensitive so they could then be admitted as evidence in the trial. Pretty bad lawyers or not big Alex ones fans.
 
I'd rather he gets to live a long and miserable life in abject poverty, receiving daily emails with updates of all the good the Sandy Hook survivors and relatives are doing with the other-worldly large compo payouts after some forensic accounting manages to locate every last cent that Infowars & Jones have squirrelled away. You're not bankrupt now Jones, but you will be.
 
I'd rather he gets to live a long and miserable life in abject poverty, receiving daily emails with updates of all the good the Sandy Hook survivors and relatives are doing with the other-worldly large compo payouts after some forensic accounting manages to locate every last cent that Infowars & Jones have squirrelled away. You're not bankrupt now Jones, but you will be.
He’s hiding his assets behind shell companies apparently.
 
They sent the records by accident. And when informed of this by the prosecution they decided not to deem them as sensitive so they could then be admitted as evidence in the trial. Pretty bad lawyers or not big Alex ones fans.

The thought has occurred to me; maybe the lawyers didn't want to perjure themselves, and sent the full data as requested(ordered?)? Not a lawyer so just guessing.
 
The thought has occurred to me; maybe the lawyers didn't want to perjure themselves, and sent the full data as requested(ordered?)? Not a lawyer so just guessing.
Me neither (lawyer). Does sound staggeringly incompetent though.
 
The thought has occurred to me; maybe the lawyers didn't want to perjure themselves, and sent the full data as requested(ordered?)? Not a lawyer so just guessing.


sounds more like trying to discredited the verdict of the trial if it was not disclosed

it is Alex jones after all


he has been screaming outside the court and online about how unfair it is that he is being described as guilty

sir this a jury based court proceeding to find out how much you have to pay in compensation

you've already lost,

your own rambling bullshit will not win over anyone in the court

searching hard for online clout,

the gobshite
 
Look up him asking alexa if she works for the CIA

Being batshite crazy is his stick and for some reason daft people buy into it
Mrs RD has been friends for years with a colleague who happens to have been in a same-sex relationship for two decades or more. 10-15 years ago, when I first met the couple, they were typically liberal left, as they had been all their adult lives. Active in gay rights in the 1980s. Collected for the miners. They are the last people you'd think would listen to Alex Jones and the like all the time. But they do. Covid is a hoax, the vaccine is dangerous, the election was stolen from Trump, and Bill Gates and George Soros are behind all this and everything else that's bad. So much the usual stuff that you'd swear they're trying to satirise it. But sadly they're not.

But they're far from daft. I blame the internet, and both the liberal and radical left's decline into the kind of identity politics they never wanted or thought they were fighting for in their activist days.
 
Last edited:
NAL either but, in the UK at least, I don't think it would be possible to accidentally send the other side a stack of evidence your client has denied exists, and then send a letter saying it's privileged and confidential. Well, possible, maybe, but not effective.
 
Mrs RD has been friends for years with a colleague who happens to have been in a same-sex relationship for two decades or more. 10-15 years ago, when I first met the couple, they were typically liberal left, as they had been all their adult lives. Active in gay rights in the 1980s. They are the last people you'd think would listen to Alex Jones and the like all the time. But they do. Covid is a hoax, the vaccine is dangerous, the election was stolen from Trump, and Bill Gates and George Soros are behind all this and everything else that's bad. So much the usual stuff that you'd swear they're trying to satirise it. But sadly they're not.

But they're far from daft. I blame the internet, and both the liberal and radical left's decline into the kind of identity politics they never wanted or thought they were fighting for in their activist days.

plenty of people do their own research but are clearly still daft

i don't blame the internet as racist fuckbags where racist before they got online

it how you view the world

oddly enough you can have a sound idea in your head and another

humans are not one issue individuals who knew
 
plenty of people do their own research but are clearly still daft

i don't blame the internet as racist fuckbags where racist before they got online

it how you view the world
You do hear much of this stuff being justified as 'I've been doing my own research...' (ie I'm surfing the internet until I find something that justifies the stuff running through my head atm.)

Thankfully, the couple I speak of are still anti-racist, at least in personal interactions and general sentiment, although they voted Brexit largely on the basis of immigration. They also speak favourably about 'Tommy.'

Seems how people view the world isn't simple at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom