Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

The irony is, you're happy to assume that having cut our close ties with our closest trading partners, there's no appreciable downturn in trade. How completely unlikely that is.
Our current international trade secretary and chancellor also profess to believe this, tbf.
 
Maybe, but I definitely know the difference between an assumption and a fact
On this OBR "4%" point you are entirely correct, however there is a degree of irony in seeing a Lexiteer outline the difference between assumption and fact. If I've understood the Lexit position correctly, it was based on the assumption that the right would not use the Lexit desired referendum outcome to accelerate their small-state consolidation and that a leftist government would be elected to use the nationalist freedom to turn the UK into a democratic socialist polity?
 
The irony is, you're happy to assume that having cut our close ties with our closest trading partners, there's no appreciable downturn in trade. How completely unlikely that is.

How have we 'cut our close ties' economically exactly?
When have I said that there is no 'appreciable downturn in trade'
On your irony scale how ironic do you find it to see alleged 'radicals' pining for a return to the order that existed for the 40 years before the referendum and making this the issue that exercises them more than, for example, the crisis of capitalism, the cost of living crisis, war, environmental catastrophe?

Looking forward to hearing from you.
 
On this OBR "4%" point you are entirely correct, however there is a degree of irony in seeing a Lexiteer outline the difference between assumption and fact. If I've understood the Lexit position correctly, it was based on the assumption that the right would not use the Lexit desired referendum outcome to accelerate their small-state consolidation and that a leftist government would be elected to use the nationalist freedom to turn the UK into a democratic socialist polity?

You can do better than this Brogdale. 3/10.
 
Making this the issue that exercises them more than, for example, the crisis of capitalism, the cost of living crisis, war, environmental catastrophe?
Agree with you.... Though this Hard Brexit is part of the cost of living crisis tbf, but rejoining is not a solution.......and immiserationist though it is this is at least degrowth, though implicated like this it literally kills people....more details at 11.30am
 
Last edited:
On this OBR "4%" point you are entirely correct, however there is a degree of irony in seeing a Lexiteer outline the difference between assumption and fact. If I've understood the Lexit position correctly, it was based on the assumption that the right would not use the Lexit desired referendum outcome to accelerate their small-state consolidation and that a leftist government would be elected to use the nationalist freedom to turn the UK into a democratic socialist polity?
What does consolidation mean again? You did explain once but it didn't sink in.
 
How have we 'cut our close ties' economically exactly?
When have I said that there is no 'appreciable downturn in trade'
On your irony scale how ironic do you find it to see alleged 'radicals' pining for a return to the order that existed for the 40 years before the referendum and making this the issue that exercises them more than, for example, the crisis of capitalism, the cost of living crisis, war, environmental catastrophe?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

I'm not wasting my time debating with you. It's utterly pointless. A case in point being the above ascertain that the issue "exercises them more than, for example, the crisis of capitalism, the cost of living crisis, war, environmental catastrophe." Where on earth do you get that from? It's a meaningless sentence. There's no sliding scale of importance for such issues. Brexit related problems are just one of a number of problems facing this country. Those that highlight these issues (radicals? wtf??) aren't focused on this exclusively, despite your perception that they do.
 
Thanks. What’s tragic is the number of people on here who endlessly bemoan the termination of membership of a trading bloc managed by unelected bureaucrats, the ECB and IMF. Weep at the relative drying up of cheap labour and who trot out estimates produced by administrators of capital that try to explain away the structural and corporeal consequences of it.

To have had your horizons lowered to the extent that the restoration of the EU order is what you are fighting for is depressing.
We didn't vote on a relationship with the IMF, so what's the relevance there?

What alternative to the EU exists that was on the ticket? You Lamar everyone else for being middle class liberals yet over nothing towork with. Meanwhile we can see the harm brexit causes
 
so what is being "consolidated" - private ownership of previously state assets?
In the Streeck(ian) sense, he viewed the consolidation in terms of the process whereby the state is increasingly de-democratised making any challenge to the (supra) state's neoliberalism harder, thus consolidating the hegemony of financialised capital.
 
The cynic in me suspects its to be on the board or major a shareholder of the firms involved
Yeah, undoubtedly these sociopaths are driven by self-interest but that risks underplaying the ideology that underpins the policy trajectory that they drive/support.
 
Thanks. What’s tragic is the number of people on here who endlessly bemoan the termination of membership of a trading bloc managed by unelected bureaucrats, the ECB and IMF. Weep at the relative drying up of cheap labour and who trot out estimates produced by administrators of capital that try to explain away the structural and corporeal consequences of it.

To have had your horizons lowered to the extent that the restoration of the EU order is what you are fighting for is depressing.
Where do you get elected bureaucrats?
 
Jeremy hunt promising a bonfire of EU red tape for our financial services industry to max out “our brexit freedoms” .Great news and so unexpected!
 
inews:

While Mr Hunt has not held back from blaming Russia for economic problems, experts said it was striking to see the Government ignore one major factor: Brexit.

“Studies have shown, compared to European countries, when you look at bounce back from pandemic, we have not bounced back so strongly,” said Hargreaves Lansdown senior investment and markets analyst Susannah Streeter.


“What was missing from statement was any talk about a reassessment of the UK’s trading relationship with the EU… If that red tape is taken away, it would really help boost the prospects for a faster recovery for the UK.”

Although Mr Hunt did not address Brexit, he would have no doubt seen the Office for Budget Responsibility’s assessment of Britain leaving the EU. The body said: “The latest evidence suggests that Brexit has had a significant adverse impact on UK trade, via reducing both overall trade volumes and the number of trading relationships between UK and EU firms.”
 
You do know this is a messageboard? Debating stuff is kind of a key reason for its existence.

Anyway, cheerio..
And yet a few posts above you had the opportunity to outline the assumptions that lay behind your decision to engage with the Tories’ EU referendum as a Lexiteer.

Presumably you didn’t assume it would turn out like this?
 
And yet a few posts above you had the opportunity to outline the assumptions that lay behind your decision to engage with the Tories’ EU referendum as a Lexiteer.

Presumably you didn’t assume it would turn out like this?

I didn't assume or presume anything. The position adopted was a) a recognition of the political opportunity to divest Britain of the dead weight of the neo-liberal EU and its gathering political federalism (plus the increasing control and punishment beatings of countries who refused to impose savage austerity like Greece by the troika of the IMF, ECB and unelected bureaucrats) with the key organising principle a race to the bottom b) the political opportunity to further widen and deepen the debate about what type of economy and society we should organise and fight for with the opportunity (still extant) to rebuild a national economy based on a shift towards economic democracy c) a chance to boot the established order in the bollocks, including all of the parties represented in the HoC who suported remain and d) a question of class solidarity - leaving aside the foul politics of the leadership of Official Leave and Official Remain - the leave vote where I live and work was overwhelmingly working class and the remain support most strident amongst useless middle class liberals.

I have explained all of this many time before on this groundhog day of a thread...
 
I didn't assume or presume anything. The position adopted was a) a recognition of the political opportunity to divest Britain of the dead weight of the neo-liberal EU and its gathering political federalism (plus the increasing control and punishment beatings of countries who refused to impose savage austerity like Greece by the troika of the IMF, ECB and unelected bureaucrats) with the key organising principle a race to the bottom b) the political opportunity to further widen and deepen the debate about what type of economy and society we should organise and fight for with the opportunity (still extant) to rebuild a national economy based on a shift towards economic democracy c) a chance to boot the established order in the bollocks, including all of the parties represented in the HoC who suported remain and d) a question of class solidarity - leaving aside the foul politics of the leadership of Official Leave and Official Remain - the leave vote where I live and work was overwhelmingly working class and the remain support most strident amongst useless middle class liberals.

I have explained all of this many time before on this groundhog day of a thread...
All good apart from D, a very localist notion of class solidarity. Majority working class near me voted remain and it was wealthy boomers who voted leave, so now what.
 
I didn't assume or presume anything. The position adopted was a) a recognition of the political opportunity to divest Britain of the dead weight of the neo-liberal EU and its gathering political federalism (plus the increasing control and punishment beatings of countries who refused to impose savage austerity like Greece by the troika of the IMF, ECB and unelected bureaucrats) with the key organising principle a race to the bottom b) the political opportunity to further widen and deepen the debate about what type of economy and society we should organise and fight for with the opportunity (still extant) to rebuild a national economy based on a shift towards economic democracy c) a chance to boot the established order in the bollocks, including all of the parties represented in the HoC who suported remain and d) a question of class solidarity - leaving aside the foul politics of the leadership of Official Leave and Official Remain - the leave vote where I live and work was overwhelmingly working class and the remain support most strident amongst useless middle class liberals.

I have explained all of this many time before on this groundhog day of a thread...
Fair play and I appreciate the concise resume of what what motivated you to engage.

From the minority perspective of someone who choose not to engage with the tory referendum I'd say that your position does, inevitably, include a number of assumptions as no-one could know what outcomes might result from the binary choice.

I suppose they include the assumptions that leaving the supra state would offer:
  • greater opportunities to challenge neoliberalism and austerity
  • more opportunity to shift debate for economic reform
  • represent a "kicking" for the "established order"
  • an expression of class solidarity
I can't really see that any of those Lexit assumptions/presumptions have been realised, but I can see that they represent a coherent basis for your support of Leave. But to say that they were not assumptions/presumptions is nonsense.
 
I can't really see that any of those Lexit assumptions/presumptions have been realised, but I can see that they represent a coherent basis for your support of Leave. But to say that they were not assumptions/presumptions is nonsense.
yeh but as i've said above the ripples from the brexit vote haven't yet settled and potentially the biggest losers from it are the conservative party, whose rabid adherence to the most fuckwitted sort of brexit imaginable may lead to their ejection and quite possibly electoral annihilation at the next general election. i suppose 'a chance to fuck shit up' would come under Smokeandsteam's (a)
 
Fair play and I appreciate the concise resume of what what motivated you to engage.

From the minority perspective of someone who choose not to engage with the tory referendum I'd say that your position does, inevitably, include a number of assumptions as no-one could know what outcomes might result from the binary choice.

I suppose they include the assumptions that leaving the supra state would offer:
  • greater opportunities to challenge neoliberalism and austerity
  • more opportunity to shift debate for economic reform
  • represent a "kicking" for the "established order"
  • an expression of class solidarity
I can't really see that any of those Lexit assumptions/presumptions have been realised, but I can see that they represent a coherent basis for your support of Leave. But to say that they were not assumptions/presumptions is nonsense.
Even if assumptions, you never get to meaningfully vote for them so can't fault a punt on that logic
 
yeh but as i've said above the ripples from the brexit vote haven't yet settled and potentially the biggest losers from it are the conservative party, whose rabid adherence to the most fuckwitted sort of brexit imaginable may lead to their ejection and quite possibly electoral annihilation at the next general election. i suppose 'a chance to fuck shit up' would come under Smokeandsteam's (a)
Possibly; but any such electoral annihilation would bring about another set of neoliberal, consolidator state actors. Nothing changes.
 
Back
Top Bottom