Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

euissue-png.351968


"What is making this the issue that exercises them more than, for example, the crisis of capitalism, the cost of living crisis, war, environmental catastrophe?"

(a bit of Friday afternoon fun ;) happy weekend brexit thread)
 
Last edited:
Different words mean different things; as a result your posts mean different things. This is true whatever your intention.

It also does nothing to address the two gaping holes in your first offering; the first of which concerns the difference between would and could, while the second I'll leave you and all other remoaners to work out.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
I suppose "remoaners" is slightly better than the "remainiac" trope.
Slightly.
 
Foolish sounds a bit harsh; millions voted Leave in good faith based on what the campaigns had told them. I think anger might be a more appropriate response from folk who feel that they were misled/used.
Some of us couldn't see that a govt - any govt - would be so criminally stupid as to leave the customs union given the obvious consequences of doing so. We under-estimated how criminally stupid (and absolutely corrupt) our govt was (and is).
 
Sure. Rees Mogg suggested 50 years didn't he, to really see the benefits, and that seems a bit long. Maybe see where we are at around 2030?
Of course, Creepy Rees Smug was careful enough to put a slice of his personal wealth & potential earnings beyond Brexit's reach by incorporating in the RoI, which speaks loudly to his own hypocrisy on the subject of "Brexit benefits", even ones half a century away.
 
Principal driver appears, to me, reducing number of people on civil service pension
Cutting down the Civil Service employment roll only has any benefit in about 20-30 yrs time though. As it is, the govt has to keep paying into PCSPS & the satellite schemes at current rates, even though they've already kicked Final Salary schemes into touch (except for the Mandarins, of course).
 
I didn't assume or presume anything. The position adopted was a) a recognition of the political opportunity to divest Britain of the dead weight of the neo-liberal EU and its gathering political federalism (plus the increasing control and punishment beatings of countries who refused to impose savage austerity like Greece by the troika of the IMF, ECB and unelected bureaucrats) with the key organising principle a race to the bottom b) the political opportunity to further widen and deepen the debate about what type of economy and society we should organise and fight for with the opportunity (still extant) to rebuild a national economy based on a shift towards economic democracy c) a chance to boot the established order in the bollocks, including all of the parties represented in the HoC who suported remain and d) a question of class solidarity - leaving aside the foul politics of the leadership of Official Leave and Official Remain - the leave vote where I live and work was overwhelmingly working class and the remain support most strident amongst useless middle class liberals.

I have explained all of this many time before on this groundhog day of a thread...
I mean, none of this was on offer or came to pass. It’s like saying “I voted brexit to ban marmite” . It’s a Groundhog Day of a thread because we can’t argue against something that has never existed.
 
Whispers the U.K. wants to move the goalposts and change their deal with EU (Twitter thread below). Sounds very much like the cherry picking approach the EU side repeatedly ruled out back in 2016:

 
Back
Top Bottom