9/11 truth film screening London Feb 26

[sparticus]

http://www.timeout.com/film/news/866.html

Screening of Loose Change, part of Time Out and Curzon Soho's 'my favourite films'

Of course if you want to save a few bob you can get your own cost price DVD on e-bay
http://search.ebay.co.uk/loose-change_W0QQcatrefZC3QQfromZR2

Best 9/11 DVD available so far IMO (although that doesn't mean I endorse every last word)

 

[editor]

From the FAQ:

. No advertising of any kind.

We are not interested in hearing about your company/website/product/new song/gig/glowing rave underpants.

This is a non-profit, community discussion forum, not a free advertising resource and offenders will be given a spanked botty.

Adverts for commercial gigs/events/parties are not allowed unless cleared beforehand by the admin team (PM with your request).

 

[In Bloom]

STASI!

 

[Jazzz]

I haven't seen Loose Change, how does it compare to the other ones like In Plane Site or Confronting the Evidence?

Nice to have some bands joining the quest.

 

[editor]

I haven't seen Loose Change, how does it compare to the other ones like In Plane Site or Confronting the Evidence?

Nice to have some bands joining the quest.

Yeah! An obscure band really adds credibility!

 

[revol68]

as does refering to it as a quest.

who the fuck are you Froddo fucking Baggins?

 

[laptop]

 

[editor]

Hold on. How do they know it's the 9/11 "truth" anyway?

Have they got any properly researched, peer reviewed, solid proof or something?

Or is the entire premise of the evening a lie?

 

[revol68]

Hold on. How do they know it's the 9/11 "truth" anyway?

Have they got any properly researched, peer reviewed, solid proof or something?

Or is the entire premise of the evening a lie?

god man, your such a square!

Don't you think it's time the cool cats phreaked out the drones?

I bet you think Tupacs dead and everything.

 

[In Bloom]

Thinking about it, this sounds quite fun, will David Shayler be there? I've been meaning to bulk up my photo collection of gullible twats hanging around with MI5 touts.

 

[barry blagger]

Interesting set of replies for a so called anarchist website

 

[Bob_the_lost]

Interesting set of replies for a so called anarchist website

You really don't know what you're on about but that's due to inexperience, after reading the forums for a bit you'll come to understand these responses.

Or you'll be another fuckwitt who doesn't understand why everyone doesn't worry more about the aliens reading your brain.

 

[editor]

Interesting set of replies for a so called anarchist website

Silly boy.

 

[barry blagger]

OK, so maybe it's not an anarchist sight. Does anyone here really believe that the US government doesnt know far more than it's letting on about 9/11?

 

[Bob_the_lost]

OK, so maybe it's not an anarchist sight. Does anyone here really believe that the US government doesnt know far more than it's letting on about 9/11?

I've changed my mind:

Ban him now and save us trying to sieve through his shit for the sixty posts or so it'll take to identify him as a low budget bigfish knock off.

 

[Jazzz]

I've changed my mind:

Ban him now and save us trying to sieve through his shit for the sixty posts or so it'll take to identify him as a low budget bigfish knock off.

And one wonders how Hitler accomplished what he did.

What on earth has BB done to deserve banning? A spelling mistake?

For what it's worth he is spot on, it's extraordinary the hysteria this topic generates around here, the Daily Mail and Oxford Union (where it was debated recently) are far more accomodating.

 

[editor]

OK, so maybe it's not an anarchist sight.

Correct. Well done. It's spelt 'site', by the way.

 

[editor]

...the Daily Mail ....are far more accomodating.

Bwahahaha! Priceless stuff!

 

[Bob_the_lost]

And one wonders how Hitler accomplished what he did.

What on earth has BB done to deserve banning? A spelling mistake?

For what it's worth he is spot on, it's extraordinary the hysteria this topic generates around here, the Daily Mail and Oxford Union (where it was debated recently) are far more accomodating.

Thanks, it's been ages since i was accused of being an apathetic racist who's easily led by a good public speaker.

 

[Jazzz]

Thanks, it's been ages since i was accused of being an apathetic racist who's easily led by a good public speaker.

I made no accusation of anyone being racist - unless those who dare to question the official theory of 9-11 are a race. So, you might have to wait a bit longer for that.

“Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th — malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.” George W. Bush

 

[Jazzz]

Bwahahaha! Priceless stuff!

Yes, I think it's absolutely priceless that the Daily Mail is more radical, subversive and willing to ask very serious questions of the establishment than urban75!

 

[fela fan]

Yes, I think it's absolutely priceless that the Daily Mail is more radical, subversive and willing to ask very serious questions of the establishment than urban75!

Wow!! The DM going down paths that urban75 won't??

What kind of stuff have they printed? I mean, was it a one-off, or do they regularly write about the topic?

You know jazzz, due to where i live i get to talk to people from various countries on a regular basis, often from europe or america. Interestingly, unlike many britons, a good deal of them are most suspicious of the USG. Even americans. The british though, mainly, won't even begin to accept the premise that the USG may have been involved in some way.

I always reckoned it to be down to the rather limited parameters that the british press work within, together with the general belief in britain that they have a free press (which is hilarious). Hence my shock at the daily mail...

 

[DOA]

you know, i used to be a confirmed 911 skeptic until i looked into it. now i think the doubters have a case and it was part of the elites push to impose world government.

id cards, extended arrest without charge, internet2, no group meetings over 2 persons, terrorist act, stop and search, anyone arrested for anything dna sampled and fingerprinted, any crime arrestable(driving offences, dropping litter whatever), extraordinary renditions, torture, end of regional police forces

anyone see a theme yet....

 

[Fong]

Bwahahaha! Priceless stuff!

He has a point tho Ed.

Maybe you guys all had this massive discussion a few years ago and collectively decided that it was all bullshit and that nothing ever said about 9/11 was true except that terrorists flew into the towers/pentagon.

Does that really mean you all need to come into every thread and just bash anyone that brings up the topic?

Here is an idea.

How about you allow free debate without throwing your weight around and let people come to their own conclusions, rather then decide for them that this is junk and as such you are going to belittle anyone that asks questions.

is it racist? Is it sexist? Is it ageist? Is there something sinister going on here? Is the entire 9/11 conspiracy really a daily mail led compaign to confuse the masses?

If not, why do you all feel the need to wade into these debates, when frankly, you know no more then I or anyone else likely to post on this message board about the situation.

Let me ask one last question, tho my post seems littered with them, I don't actually expect any reasonable answers on anything I have asked, just much backslapping and caustic wit. However, I do have one question.

Why don't you believe any of the conspiracies about 9/11?

I can give you my reason, its more a reason of logic then of evidence.

I don't believe the US/UK government could keep anything this big quiet. Simple as that, I think if they had any involvement in this at all, we would know about it from a credible source.

Yet, i don't feel the need to jump in and belittle anyone asking questions.

 

[DOA]

He has a point tho Ed.

Maybe you guys all had this massive discussion a few years ago and collectively decided that it was all bullshit and that nothing ever said about 9/11 was true except that terrorists flew into the towers/pentagon.

Does that really mean you all need to come into every thread and just bash anyone that brings up the topic?

Here is an idea.

How about you allow free debate without throwing your weight around and let people come to their own conclusions, rather then decide for them that this is junk and as such you are going to belittle anyone that asks questions.

is it racist? Is it sexist? Is it ageist? Is there something sinister going on here? Is the entire 9/11 conspiracy really a daily mail led compaign to confuse the masses?

If not, why do you all feel the need to wade into these debates, when frankly, you know no more then I or anyone else likely to post on this message board about the situation.

Let me ask one last question, tho my post seems littered with them, I don't actually expect any reasonable answers on anything I have asked, just much backslapping and caustic wit. However, I do have one question.

Why don't you believe any of the conspiracies about 9/11?

I can give you my reason, its more a reason of logic then of evidence.

I don't believe the US/UK government could keep anything this big quiet. Simple as that, I think if they had any involvement in this at all, we would know about it from a credible source.

Yet, i don't feel the need to jump in and belittle anyone asking questions.

agreed, apart from the last part. the us/uk could hide anything, and credible sources can be paid off, blackmailed or killed.

anyone who thinks 4 airliners could fly around US airspace ignoring traffic control without one of them at least being intercepted is not using their intelllect

 

[Fong]

agreed, apart from the last part. the us/uk could hide anything, and credible sources can be paid off, blackmailed or killed.

anyone who thinks 4 airliners could fly around US airspace ignoring traffic control without one of them at least being intercepted is not using their intelllect

I just don't think so, not something like this. Too many people would need to know and its a serious enough issue that not everyone is going to agree that it was neccessary.

Perhaps keeping quiet actions taken against a foreign nation, but allowing the destruction of two towers and the deaths of nearly 3,000 people?

Nah, they couldn't keep that quiet.

Tho the fact that those planes flew around unhindered for so long, when the number of times that the USA sent out jets to intercept other planes that had lost communication, gone off course and etc prior to this. Does seem to stick out a bit, but that could easily be a question of a failing rather then a deliberate action.

 

[editor]

Why don't you believe any of the conspiracies about 9/11?

Errr, there have been endless long, looooooooooooooong threads discussing just about every single imaginable aspect of 9/11.

These forums have been peppered with a cavalcade of highly imaginative and fanciful conspiracy theories, with a handful of obsessed posters constantly regurgitating book-flogging guff about invisible pods, vanishing passengers, squadrons of Mike Yarwoods - you name it.

Yet despite there being - literally - thousands of the pages on the subject, actual, factual, credible peer-reviewed evidence remains forever elusive to the (guffaw) "truth seekers."

That's why most people here either ignore them or tear their ridiculous fantasies to pieces, just for fun.

But now it's become as boring as fuck and I've no wish to see the same bullshit being repeated all over again for the zillioneth time, so in line with our oft-stated policy of binning 9/11 threads that simply repeat themselves with absolutely nothing new being offered, this one's being closed.