Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
prejudicing a jury? revealing details of past life that aren't necessarily relevant to case but could sway influence? that kind of thing.Why?
prejudicing a jury? revealing details of past life that aren't necessarily relevant to case but could sway influence? that kind of thing.Why?
this taking of 'likes' on facebook as representative of significant views gets wearing. The likeage variable is so huge. Theres everything from reflex likers, considered likers and everything in between. Its about as significant as someone nodding while another person says something. imo
What jury? What charges? That's the key bit here.prejudicing a jury? revealing details of past life that aren't necessarily relevant to case but could sway influence? that kind of thing.
this taking of 'likes' on facebook as representative of significant views gets wearing. The likeage variable is so huge. Theres everything from reflex likers, considered likers and everything in between. Its about as significant as someone nodding while another person says something. imo
that isn't really the point. the media use the word "alleged" and "accused" for very particular legal reasons, when discussing what people are said to have done. that's why, for eg, ITV apparently took the "confession" to the killing from red-hand geezer out of their 6pm coverage, but left the "eye for an eye" bit in.Think it will take more than newspaper articles mentioning their personal lives to get them off - they were caught red handed - literally - and judging by their statements immediately after have no intention of denying what they did.
? so there won't be a trial here?What jury? What charges? That's the key bit here.
Skim-read that. Poor woman. Articles like that about her already. She hasn't spoken to the Telegraph - 'friends' have. Leave her alone.Telegraph has info on the parents
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...s-mother-tried-to-prevent-radicalisation.html
Think about it paulie.? so there won't be a trial here?
Telegraph has info on the parents
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...s-mother-tried-to-prevent-radicalisation.html
Think about it paulie.
they're gwan to die in the hospital?Think about it paulie.
Other than talking about stuff that is part of a trial we sort of have the right to talk about what we want - you want to get rid of that?they're gwan to die in the hospital?
jeremy hunt's masterplan comes through at last?
struggling otherwise chief....
they're gwan to die in the hospital?
jeremy hunt's masterplan comes through at last?
struggling otherwise chief....
Interesting - looks like he came from a middle class background - would be interesting to see some kind of analysis of the class backgrounds of 'western' born (meaning British, European, US etc) suicide bombers if anyone knows of one.
do you want your five punts now?Other than talking about stuff that is part of a trial we sort of have the right to talk about what we want - you want to get rid of that?
Please let me know if you are paulie tandori so i can cut you some slack.
what, ship them off to gitmo? get real.Those aren't the only options. Think about what has happened to other British born terror suspects.
jeremy hunt's masterplan comes through at last?
Not like ye to be arguing for shutting down of the press.do you want your five punts now?
That can't possibly happen. They will certainly stand trial here. It would be utterly impossible for them not to.what, ship them off to gitmo? get real.
no, but i would argue to ensure that a fair trial takes place, and precognition as to what they did or said or witnessed shouldn't be allowed to form part of a reasoable defence.Not like ye to be arguing for shutting down of the press.
You're saying that background reporting can't and should no happen. They'd love that. However, the establishing work for trials on our side say otherwise. On an immediate instrumental basis - never mind the principle.no, but i would argue to ensure that a fair trial takes place, and precognition as to what they did or said or witnessed shouldn't be allowed to form part of a reasoable defence.
Interesting - looks like he came from a middle class background - would be interesting to see some kind of analysis of the class backgrounds of 'western' born (meaning British, European, US etc) suicide bombers if anyone knows of one.
no, but it's quite a new thing to see such a level of detail immediately available on the crime, the aftermath, the background etc and if i was a defence lawyer, i reckon i could get the first couple of juries discharged simply on asking whose got a twitter, facebook or even fucking daily mirror bookmark, let alone the rest.You're saying that background reporting can't and should no happen. They'd love that. However, the establishing work for trials on our side say otherwise. On an immediate instrumental basis - never mind the principle.
Yeah I do think the motivations are different, though linked in some ways. But having a significant part of the Muslim population with serious grievances against British foreign policy must make it easier for them to hide - just like if the IRA hadn't had so much support among Catholics in NI it would have been easier to deal with them - for various reasons. They might feel more inclined to help them hide, or at least less inclined to inform on them. And I dare say there are some who may express support online etc for these actions but who would never do them (and if they saw it up close would likely be as disgusted as anyone else) - absent these grievances that kind of 'noise' would surely be reduced.
I'm just thinking out loud now by the way, this is probably full of holes.
Why not get your old name back you daftie.we shall see i suppose.
feck knows, don't know how to really. good to speak to you again anyhow you old grumpyWhy not get your old name back you daftie.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22664468MI5 asked Woolwich murder suspect Michael Adebolajo if he wanted to work for them, a childhood friend has said.
Abu Nusaybah told BBC Two's Newsnight his friend had revealed to him six months ago that the security service had been "knocking on his door".
He said Mr Adebolajo told him he had turned down an offer to work for them. The BBC could not obtain any confirmation from Whitehall sources.
Mr Nusaybah was arrested at the BBC after giving the interview.
Mr Nusaybah said that, six months ago, his friend was "basically being harassed by MI5, this is something that he specifically mentioned to me".
He added: "His wording was, 'They are bugging me - they won't leave me alone.'