Dillinger4
Es gibt Zeit
Now that is the kind of thing I like to see.
MADISON, Wis. — A Wisconsin judge issued a temporary restraining order Friday blocking the state's new and contentious collective bargaining law from taking effect, a measure that drew tens of thousands of protesters to the state Capitol and sent some Democrats fleeing to Illinois in an attempt to block a vote on it.
The judge's order is a major setback for new Republican Gov. Scott Walker and puts the future of the law in question.
Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi issued the order, which was requested by that county's District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat. Ozanne filed a lawsuit contending that a legislative committee that broke a stalemate that had kept the law in limbo for weeks met without the 24-hour notice required by Wisconsin's open meetings law. The Republican-controlled Legislature passed the measure and Walker signed it last week.
This may be missed with everything going on in Japan. A judge has blocked the law from taking effect:
Here's the next step: Food Stamps Cut off for Entire Families If One Member Strikes
I can't imagine that's constitutional. They're punishing people for exercising their free speech rights.
How is going on strike exercising free speech?
How is going on strike exercising free speech?
I can't imagine that's constitutional. They're punishing people for exercising their free speech rights.
Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship.
The right to strike is just that -> a right.
Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship.
The right to strike is just that -> a right.
1988 case of Lyng v.International Union set a precedent that it was constitutional i'm afraid.
I believe you have a disconnect here. The right to strike stems from the combination of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly and association (at least in the US).
Are they all like you at home?
ok.... so if you have the freedom of speech and the freedom of association, then you automatically have the right to strike?
and denying some unions the right to strike (as some are in Canada), then you no longer have these freedoms?
Sorry, I don't see how being denied the right to strike is denying free speech.
It is the right to political expression.
So striking is a method of political expression????
Sorry, I can't buy that. If Joe Blow's Garage goes on strike, it's against Joe Blow, not the government.
So striking is a method of political expression????
Sorry, I can't buy that. If Joe Blow's Garage goes on strike, it's against Joe Blow, not the government.
The personal is political.