Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
If you hear/see people changing from DK as result of this then let us know. If people already decided didn't like it, or liked it, then don't bother (sorry that sounds sarky, it wasn't meant to be - hard-headed realism is what is was going for).

http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/03/yougov-reports-its-highest-yes-vote-yet/

"It has long been apparent that the currency intervention had not produced any boost for the No side. It is now beginning to look as though the last six weeks may, if anything, have seen the Yes side catch up a little further.

Certainly today’s poll confirms the message of last Sunday’s ICM poll that it is the Yes side rather than No that has been making some progress so far as the economic debate is concerned".

Of course, Yes is still behind.
 
http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/03/yougov-reports-its-highest-yes-vote-yet/

"It has long been apparent that the currency intervention had not produced any boost for the No side. It is now beginning to look as though the last six weeks may, if anything, have seen the Yes side catch up a little further.

Certainly today’s poll confirms the message of last Sunday’s ICM poll that it is the Yes side rather than No that has been making some progress so far as the economic debate is concerned".

Of course, Yes is still behind.

Cheers. So, fair to say now that since that intervention there has been a small rise for YES and a smaller drop in NO. Of course, that's not to say that the latter is a direct result of the former - there's been a whole series of clumsy interventions from the NO side that seem to be me have accumulated and gave the impression of high handed establishment interfering buffonery which has alienated a number of people and which the YES side have tried to make gains out of - but again, that's not to say the small improvement in the YES vote is down to the YES campaign, i suspect it's more of a social reaction to the NO idiots than love to the YES politicians. I think what the interventions may be doing and which may prove significant closer to the time is hardening up the YES vote, exactly the opposite of what was intended - shaking up and scaring the less committed. That may still happen closer to the actual vote though.
 
and Bowie!

why the fuck Bowie cares is anyones guess...

There's a bit of a cleft stick situation for the English here. If they say nothing, then it's typical Enlish indifference to the Scots. If they say something, then who the fuck do they think they are to have an opinion?

I can see why most celebs are staying the fuck out of this one, I really can.
 
There's a bit of a cleft stick situation for the English here. If they say nothing, then it's typical Enlish indifference to the Scots. If they say something, then who the fuck do they think they are to have an opinion?

I can see why most celebs are staying the fuck out of this one, I really can.

or you risk the sort of vocal 'who cares? let em get on with it' opinion that I think most people in england share (based on nothing except people I have discussed the matter with)

Personally I would like the union to stay the union cos I like scottish people, they are like even more northern than my geordie sperm donor.

if I was a resident of woadland I'd vote yes to independance though. I mean, fuck westminster.


a thought did occur to me wrt the choice being exended to 16 yo's. Thats got to be a fucker for psephologists and pollsters in general hasn't it? There's no patterns and previous to analyse so they will be relying on demographics, facebook polls and random guessing.
 
There's a bit of a cleft stick situation for the English here. If they say nothing, then it's typical English indifference to the Scots. If they say something, then who the fuck do they think they are to have an opinion?

I can see why most celebs are staying the fuck out of this one, I really can.

Nah, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but equally others are entitled to mock that opinion mercilessly, especially if the opinion comes from someone who doesn't even live in the UK :)
 
Polls tend to be about 1000 people being asked(any time I've checked) You can't gauge anything properly on that small a sample imo. The last Holyrood elections saw just under 2 million people vote. How does 1000 represent that? It's not even 1%, it's not near 1%. 1% would be 10,000 people. That's when you might see a figure worth giving some consideration to.
 
Polls tend to be about 1000 people being asked(any time I've checked) You can't gauge anything properly on that small a sample imo. The last Holyrood elections saw just under 2 million people vote. How does 1000 represent that? It's not even 1%, it's not near 1%. 1% would be 10,000 people. That's when you might see a figure worth giving some consideration to.


George Gallup, the father of modern polling, used to reply to the point by saying that you don’t need to drink a whole bowl of soup to know if it is too salty – providing it is properly stirred a single spoonful will suffice.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/faq-sampling

More info here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_poll
 
Last edited:
Polls tend to be about 1000 people being asked(any time I've checked) You can't gauge anything properly on that small a sample imo. The last Holyrood elections saw just under 2 million people vote. How does 1000 represent that? It's not even 1%, it's not near 1%. 1% would be 10,000 people. That's when you might see a figure worth giving some consideration to.
Are you suggesting that polls are shit? That the methodology of the pollsters is wrong? That you don't like the results of particular polls? What? Do say.
 
Polls tend to be about 1000 people being asked(any time I've checked) You can't gauge anything properly on that small a sample imo. The last Holyrood elections saw just under 2 million people vote. How does 1000 represent that? It's not even 1%, it's not near 1%. 1% would be 10,000 people. That's when you might see a figure worth giving some consideration to.
It's what called a representative sample - they're pretty bloody good at gauging public opinion. Far more so than someone saying well all my mates think this therefore it's true across the country.
 
Polls tend to be about 1000 people being asked(any time I've checked) You can't gauge anything properly on that small a sample imo.
You've said this before and it's just rubbish. So long as the sample is representative then 1000 people is a large enough sample to extrapolate the results to a larger population.
 
butchersapron

The polls do indicate the Yes campaign have a lot of people to persuade, but there is movement in the their direction, and it is unlikely there will be a yes vote. The value in the polls is the fact there are so many of them though, which tend to produce similar results. TNS have a strange methodology though - that does look like an outlier.

The Yes-No divide (after including don't knows), I think might be a bit better for Yes than the polls suggest. But there does need to be a swing which really depends on how badly the Nos fuck up.

A single poll of 1,000 people is close to worthless, a collection of them over months have some value though. The TNS poll you put up, I would put in that category.

I think there is a chance of a yes vote, but we need to see this swing increasing in the months ahead.
 
Last edited:
Anecdotal (obviously) but I overheard two dads talking in the playground at school drop-off this morning, one English, both saying they'd been undecided but the bullying currency union stuff had made them lean strongly towards Yes now.
 
The owner of Barrhead Travel (which employs 800 people across 45 branches) has been trying to influence how his (chiefly minimum wage) employees vote with thinly veiled threats to their jobs. Isn't that illegal?

barrhead.jpg
 
Nationalists tweeting the boss of Barrhead Travel is bullying and a 'new low'. The boss of Barrhead Travel sending every employee a letter telling them how to vote is an example of a Scottish success story to be proud of. Fuck up, Jim.
 
oh aye, it's total tripe.

The email or Lyddon's work? Have you read the latter? On page 19 is a very interesting observation, which gives a clue as to why Salmond wishes to keep the British pound:

Lyddon said:
Mexico was the first country in the 1980s to default and it did so in an unexpected manner – it only
defaulted on its foreign currency debt to it foreign creditors, but continued to pay out on its peso debt
to domestic creditors. This led to the extension of the mantra “governments never default on their own
debts” to “governments never default on their own debts if they are in their own currency”.

And he goes on to extend this to the Euro.

But really, as I've said upthread, I really would prefer an independent Scotland to have its own currency, in which case Lyddon's objection goes away.

Nationalists tweeting the boss of Barrhead Travel is bullying and a 'new low'. The boss of Barrhead Travel sending every employee a letter telling them how to vote is an example of a Scottish success story to be proud of. Fuck up, Jim.

Sorry but I've got to disagree. He's free to express his opinions in whatever form he chooses. It's not bullying: it's going to be a secret ballot so he won't know how his employees vote.
 
Back
Top Bottom