8ball
Decolonise colons!
That needs some backing up.
Quartz needs to back it up you mean? Well, he was asked, he was still being asked yesterday - he has flatly refused to.That needs some backing up.
Quartz needs to back it up you mean? Well, he was asked, he was still being asked yesterday - he has flatly refused to.
gutted and sorry for Scotland
Well, that remains to be seen.Why? Most got what they wanted.
Well, that didn't take long:
(I know there's a conspiracy thread, but this was so on topic, thought it should go here.)
Not sure how you can judge that. A 55 percent no vote plus extra powers devolved to the Scottish parliament, if that happens, would appear to me to kick the question of independence rather a long way down the road.It is quite likely that the Union in the longer term is now dead anyway, but messily, and drawn out, rather than cleanly.
We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.Not sure how you can judge that. A 55 percent no vote plus extra powers devolved to the Scottish parliament, if that happens, would appear to me to kick the question of independence rather a long way down the road.
You might be right. We'll see. That's where some good could come from this - there is another answer to the West Lothian question, and that is devolution within the rest of the UK, too, a move towards federalism.We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
The english populace - which does not exist as a unitary body with one view - will vote the same way as they would if the independence had been won - it will not effect the english vote in the GE at all. That is, labour winning a small-medium majority. Or the tories. Either way, this result will mean nothing electorally - beyond UKIP breaking off another chunk of tory support. Which in itself, shows there is no electoral english populace.We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
There's an awful lot of traditional Labour voters up here disgusted with the way they stood side by side with the Tories.I'm not sure I understand your logic with this prediction. Element of wishful thinking?
At the same time, Labour voters voted 2-1 'no'. tbf I would guess that a fair few people were disgusted by all sides in the debates. How much damage has the SNP done itself by revealing its rather neoliberal vision of the future?There's an awful lot of traditional Labour voters up here disgusted with the way they stood side by side with the Tories.
At the same time, Labour voters voted 2-1 'no'. tbf I would guess that a fair few people were disgusted by all sides in the debates. How much damage has the SNP done itself by revealing its rather neoliberal vision of the future?
How much backing do you want them to secure? I would think that 2/3 is a pretty decent return, higher than the libdems got, if the Ashcroft thing is to be believed.The fact that Labour couldn't secure the backing of it's working class vote is more damaging
How much backing do you want them to secure? I would think that 2/3 is a pretty decent return, higher than the libdems got, if the Ashcroft thing is to be believed.
It's not inconsistent to have voted Labour and voted 'yes', but only about 1/3 did so.
In the ashcroft poll by both. And more of 2010 voted for NO than the 2011 lot. 69/63% (off top-of head, posted link earlier - give us a bit)How are Labour voters defined? Going by Westminster or Holyrood elections?
I know the feeling. Labour disintegration scenarios looking bit like yes victory scenarios to me.Thanks. Bit too tired to think about all this at the moment.
Because the only stable settlement would be a federal UK. We won't get that. The wrangling and instability caused by asymmetric devolution will lead to further constitutional crises. We can already see that the referendum promises are unravelling; the Westminster backbench backlash is under way.Not sure how you can judge that
If the executive arms of the state (from tory passing to labour next time) are in agreement - and they are - these people don't matter.Because the only stable settlement would be a federal UK. We won't get that. The wrangling and instability caused by asymmetric devolution will lead to further constitutional crises. We can already see that the referendum promises are unravelling; the Westminster backbench backlash is under way.
There will be a devolution scheme, but it won't be stable.If the executive arms of the state (from tory passing to labour next time) are in agreement - and they are - these people don't matter.
Why not? (i'm not saying any model will be).The executive runs thing not (or the cabinet) - MPs don't matter.There will be a devolution scheme, but it won't be stable.