Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
Quartz needs to back it up you mean? Well, he was asked, he was still being asked yesterday - he has flatly refused to.

Yeah, that's exactly what I mean. I don't hold with some of the arguments used by some of the Yes camp on this site, but I didn't see anything coming close to bigotry and I've probably seen most of the whole gamut of the recent Scots indy threads.
 
Why? Most got what they wanted.
Well, that remains to be seen.

The constitutional wranglings that will now ensue may well result in a UK that No voters didn't envisage or want. For example, Cameron is already talking about a 2 tier Westminster. That is a new proposal (in the sense that it wasn't put before referendum voters).

It is quite likely that the Union in the longer term is now dead anyway, but messily, and drawn out, rather than cleanly.
 
Well, that didn't take long:


(I know there's a conspiracy thread, but this was so on topic, thought it should go here.)

Must be very time consuming, waiting for every single public event to find evidence of the NWO. That clown must have sat up all night, not to get the result, but to make his shitty video. Christ. :rolleyes:
 
It is quite likely that the Union in the longer term is now dead anyway, but messily, and drawn out, rather than cleanly.
Not sure how you can judge that. A 55 percent no vote plus extra powers devolved to the Scottish parliament, if that happens, would appear to me to kick the question of independence rather a long way down the road.
 
Not sure how you can judge that. A 55 percent no vote plus extra powers devolved to the Scottish parliament, if that happens, would appear to me to kick the question of independence rather a long way down the road.
We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
 
We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
You might be right. We'll see. That's where some good could come from this - there is another answer to the West Lothian question, and that is devolution within the rest of the UK, too, a move towards federalism.

As for the SNP gaining more MPs, perhaps. Or perhaps this marks the high-point of SNP popularity.
 
We're not going to get any extra powers. The English populace won't stand for it as they will see it as taking away from them. They will elect people who won't give us it in 2015. Can't blame them really. Independence is the only answer to the West Lothian question. Scotland meanwhile will punish Labour in 2015 and return more SNP MPs.
The english populace - which does not exist as a unitary body with one view - will vote the same way as they would if the independence had been won - it will not effect the english vote in the GE at all. That is, labour winning a small-medium majority. Or the tories. Either way, this result will mean nothing electorally - beyond UKIP breaking off another chunk of tory support. Which in itself, shows there is no electoral english populace.
 
Laurie Penny has just come out in favour of a yes vote lol obviously didn't want the referendum to interfere with promoting her book
 
The fact that Labour couldn't secure the backing of it's working class vote is more damaging
How much backing do you want them to secure? I would think that 2/3 is a pretty decent return, higher than the libdems got, if the Ashcroft thing is to be believed.

It's not inconsistent to have voted Labour and voted 'yes', but only about 1/3 did so.
 
How much backing do you want them to secure? I would think that 2/3 is a pretty decent return, higher than the libdems got, if the Ashcroft thing is to be believed.

It's not inconsistent to have voted Labour and voted 'yes', but only about 1/3 did so.

Labours vote is pretty much split between working and middle classes . They lost the argument with the working class voter hence the yes votes in working class areas.
 
Salmond resigning, protesting that the 'supposed unified front has become un-unified far quicker than even I had imagined'. Fair shout tbh. Going to be a shafting.
 
Not sure how you can judge that
Because the only stable settlement would be a federal UK. We won't get that. The wrangling and instability caused by asymmetric devolution will lead to further constitutional crises. We can already see that the referendum promises are unravelling; the Westminster backbench backlash is under way.
 
Because the only stable settlement would be a federal UK. We won't get that. The wrangling and instability caused by asymmetric devolution will lead to further constitutional crises. We can already see that the referendum promises are unravelling; the Westminster backbench backlash is under way.
If the executive arms of the state (from tory passing to labour next time) are in agreement - and they are - these people don't matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom