geminisnake
a complex mass of conflicting ideas
Nope, not really. Which is strange with Dundee being very Labour til recently.
Just out of interest, and apologies if this is covered properly elsewhere in the thread, but is there any obvious reason why Urban is so out of step with the rest of Scotland on independence? A two thirds majority here, and even one third in favour in the country as a whole would be a huge relief to Salmond. Why?
Loyalists pushing for unionism. meh, those votes are already decided...hopefully people (undecided) recognise anachronism and bigotry when they see it.Mason Boyne and his illustrious brothers are on the march
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/orange-order-in-no-vote-campaign.20885828
and some of the worshipful brothers are..surprise surprise..calling for them to be allowed gerrymander the vote by having their Ulster brethren with scottish ancestry ...from fucking centuries ago..to be allowed vote as well.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-19710873
dickheads
Loyalists pushing for unionism. meh, those votes are already decided...hopefully people (undecided) recognise anachronism and bigotry when they see it.
.
I know some think that it won't happen this time, but planting the seeds for those who come later comes first from effort. Can't fail if you don't try
The OO in some parts of Scotland is like the Catholic Church in some parts of (wherever)...it's a social thing...sadly driven by concepts akin to those of jehovah's witnesses which are ridiculous and driven by seperatism (ironically) and a feeling of superiority....both of which are typical Scots traits mind but never mind...where was I?I honestly cant see how they believe the Orange Order will actually attract No voters ...
That's not true, though, as has been pointed out several times during the thread. The thing to remember is that Scotland only returns a tiny proportion of the UK's MPs; in 2015, the number of Scottish MPs will be 52 out of 600. That's 8.66%. And although Scotland only returned one Tory last time, not all of its other MPs are Labour: there are also SNP and Lib Dems. Indeed, those Lib Dems actually contributed to putting David Cameron into number 10 last time.the rest of us will be fucked if you go as we'll end up being ruled by southern tories far more often without your MPs in parliament, and I for one don't really fancy that prospect.
Labour would still have won three of the last four general elections if the vote had been England onlyso then scots folk, what would your feelings be if you do go for independence for northern English counties to have the option to decide to go with you rather than sticking with London as our rulers.
I mean let's face it, the rest of us will be fucked if you go as we'll end up being ruled by southern tories far more often without your MPs in parliament, and I for one don't really fancy that prospect.
JTG said:Labour would still have won three of the last four general elections if the vote had been England only
Few trade unionists for example seriously believe that UK Labour would restore trade union rights under a Miliband government just as they didn’t under Blair and Brown and for Scots a Yes vote looks like an increasingly serious alternative.
If those who back independence from a radical perspective are able to translate their desire for change into a coherent Red/Green policy programme putting concrete proposals into the debate not only would they boost the campaign for a Yes vote but also start to map out the shape of a new progressive independent Scotland.
"An independent Scotland would leave the rest of the UK's international reputation damaged, a committee of MPs has said". BBC.
well ok, that might be a bit of hyperbole, but it still leaves the tories effectively needing 52 seats less in England to get in to power, though the point about the lib dems is a fair one, I guess we'll have to see how many scottish lib dems are left after the next election to see if that was still an anti tory vote (though I think kennedy might well get a bit of a pass on that one as being the only one to vote against the coalition agreement).That's not true, though, as has been pointed out several times during the thread. The thing to remember is that Scotland only returns a tiny proportion of the UK's MPs; in 2015, the number of Scottish MPs will be 52 out of 600. That's 8.66%. And although Scotland only returned one Tory last time, not all of its other MPs are Labour: there are also SNP and Lib Dems. Indeed, those Lib Dems actually contributed to putting David Cameron into number 10 last time.
When Blair came to power in 1997, his majority was 179. Without Scottish MPs he'd still have had his majority (even if all of Scotland’s MPs were Labour, which they weren't).
Here are the stats again:
http://wingsland.podgamer.com/why-labour-doesnt-need-scotland/
well ok, that might be a bit of hyperbole, but it still leaves the tories effectively needing 52 seats less in England to get in to power,
Perhaps we ought to be pushing for some form of developed regional government ourselves or something.
There's never been much appetite for devolution in the English regions, though, has there? A workable solution to asymmetric devolution would be a federal UK. But that train is stuck in the depot.free spirit said:Perhaps we ought to be pushing for some form of developed regional government ourselves or something.
so then scots folk, what would your feelings be if you do go for independence for northern English counties to have the option to decide to go with you rather than sticking with London as our rulers.
I mean let's face it, the rest of us will be fucked if you go as we'll end up being ruled by southern tories far more often without your MPs in parliament, and I for one don't really fancy that prospect.
so then scots folk, what would your feelings be if you do go for independence for northern English counties to have the option to decide to go with you rather than sticking with London as our rulers.
Cheers. I'm on Twitter, so I've retweeted the message.danny la rouge, if you can get access through your daughter do it!! Dunno how long this will stay up and don't know how to copy a video
DexterTCN
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=561268990561311
I don't really get what you mean it's not a "political issue"? It seems to me that it is a highly political issue, particular in terms of the reasons you give for supporting it, which seem to be mainly about magically protecting Scotland from tory governments in the future.PS you don't have to like Salmond to believe in independence. I really wish people would get it through their thick skulls that this is NOT a political issue
Ideas about nations and countries are political in the broader sense, even if they're not party-political.Ever heard the expression If I have to explain you won't understand?? That. It's not about the SNP or Labour, etc, it's about the country.