Observer Hack said:Referring to the Guardian's decision to run the advert, the Observer quoted an unidentified source "with knowledge of the Values Network's ad-buying practices" as saying:
"The Guardian may be left wing but they obviously believe in free speech and allowing their readers to hear the voice of a Nobel laureate about a very important issue."
But the Guardian's acceptance of an advert does not mean, of course, that it endorses the views and claims made within it.
That link don't work for me - try this one. It's always there, just under the surface of these privately schooled oxbridge types though.I always used to quite like Hadley Freeman until I read this piece of shite:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/08/dont-tell-me-what-think-about-Israel
She was at a UK private school then oxbridge. She's playing up her americanism.Was she educated here though? She says she's American, I did not know this before. Not that I have an awful lot of time for privately schooled Oxbridge types either....
This is it, this is the final reason why the Guardian can go fuck itself IMO.
Fuck. Right. Off.
Never using their website again if they publish it.
Ah, but they don't agree with it. They just get paid to publish it. Which is worse really. Imagine they were paid to print the Sun's lies about Hillsborough and they said yes.Amazing. Is The Guardian really deciding to go down the Sun/Hillsborough route?
i think this is the point at which it's become plain that the guardian has gone down the panBastards:
"The decision to run any display advertisement in the Guardian is made on a case-by-case basis and there was a full discussion about accepting the advert in question. However, the acceptance of advertising from any organisation does not equate to support or endorsement for the views expressed in that advert. The Guardian is fully committed to reporting from the Middle East and our coverage will continue to be independent and robust."
Same excuses.
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/...ing-Hamas-child-sacrifice-advert#.U-ilyWO6UYK
it was probably penny's idea to accept itAny of their employees though? Jones? Milne (He'll probably blame it on a US conspiracy)? Penny? That lot.
Any of their employees though? Jones? Milne (He'll probably blame it on a US conspiracy)? Penny? That lot.
@OwenJones84: @AsaWinstanley @deeinsidefilm @guardian @SeumasMilne I think the advert is vile and I have as much say over it as anybody else here
@SeumasMilne: @FarooqSumar @MaxBlumenthal Thanks Farooq, ad is repulsive and inflammatory
Ah but Owen, whilst you may have as much say in it running as me or most others there are other things you could do/not do. For example writing a piece (about european anti-semitism ffs) that is published on the same day as this racist shit. Or never writing for them again. You know, a few principled stands like that.there is this tweet
and this one
That's just crazy.
Lots of papers did i think.Yeah it stinks. Didn't the New York Times post it too?