Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/08/guardian-view-gaza-rise-antisemitism?CMP=twt_gu

I'm all for opposing anti-Semitism but this analysis is rather simplistic. For example, no mention of the far-right Jewish Defence League instigating violence in France that is causing clashes at Gaza protests.

http://www.france24.com/en/20140729-calls-mount-ban-france-violent-jewish-defence-league/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ders-ban-on-radical-jewish-group-9640776.html

There are also major caveats to the CST's data set (as alarming as it might originally read).

This whole "New Wave of European Anti-Semitism" thing seems well dodgy to me. The figure of a 72% increase in jews emigrating for Israel from France I have seen elsewhere in the media as somewhere in the mid-30s% but my internet is running slow and I can't be arsed to check the original. But in any event the overall figure is tiny - about 3000 - compared to about 250,000 Israeli passport holders who live in the EU. I've seen some comments about there being a "new Exodus" - if that term is right, it's basically out of Israel and towards Europe. And when emigration rates to Israel are so low, many of them will be of the elderly/young relatives going to live with ageing family etc, but frankly I can't see how some at least aren't some pretty nasty politico-religious extremists who are turned on by the idea of being able to go and strut around with a machine gun in some settlement somewhere, so they ain't "fleeing" anything.

It's interesting too how the similar rise of anti-semitic activity in the USA is almost completely ignored since it doesn't fit the Hadley Freeman "Europe, your [anti-semitic] roots are showing" line - because of the generally high level of US public support for Israel.

It seems clear to me that this anti-Israel=anti-semitic thing is the new line of defence for Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians, it's the last feasible bit of moral high ground that Israel-apologists have to play with.

But it means that anyone who wants to campaign against the Israeli war machine needs to be very careful with their language.
 
Any of their employees though? Jones? Milne (He'll probably blame it on a US conspiracy)? Penny? That lot.

Apologies, just seen this now. I can confirm from her Twitterings that Penny has said absolutely fuck-all whatsoever about the current situation in Gaza. I mentioned elsewhere that Owen Jones spoke at the London Gaza demo last Saturday, and - surprise! - didn't mention this at all (wonder why, eh?)
 
...and, the boy Jones has just posted this comment re that Graun ad on FB:

Owen - I've repeatedly said I think the advert is vile. Over and over again. No, I'm not going to resign - what you're asking is for radical voices to purge themselves from the mainstream media and thus stop being able to reach large numbers of people with ideas that depart from the mainstream consensus. It would be a tremendous victory for the Establishment if its critics deprived themselves of a platform - that's exactly what they'd love me to do.

I've not seen him do this condemnation anywhere in print, online etc, though - has anyone else here done so?
 
What sort of people do he think reads the guardian? Does he realise what he's writing for? He's hardly Pilger in his heyday in the mirror.

That is such a backslapping pathetic response. Little own battling away in the heart of the establishment - for us. Just lost a big chunk of the goodwill i was prepared to extend to him there. Apply the same weasel-logic to hillsborough and what would we find?
 
What sort of people do he think reads the guardian? Does he realise what he's writing for? He's hardly Pilger in his heyday in the mirror.

That is such a backslapping pathetic response. Little own battling away in the heart of the establishment - for us. Just lost a big chunk of the goodwill i was prepared to extend to him there. Apply the same weasel-logic to hillsborough and what would we find?

Exactly. I mean, what else is anyone to make of his stance here? At least with the Penny one, we expect content-free and principle-free waffling. But for Jones to do this, and also to speak at the London Gaza demo the day after that ad was published, knowing full well what his employers had done, is....well.....
 
What would the masses who rely on the guardian do if Jones were to resign - the results simply don't bear thinking about. It would almost be game over. Owen must stay! I feel a campaign coming on.

A campaign run by Penny too, no doubt (Oh God, I bet that scenario would actually happen too..."We are all Owen Jones!" etc)
 
This whole "New Wave of European Anti-Semitism" thing seems well dodgy to me. The figure of a 72% increase in jews emigrating for Israel from France I have seen elsewhere in the media as somewhere in the mid-30s% but my internet is running slow and I can't be arsed to check the original. But in any event the overall figure is tiny - about 3000 - compared to about 250,000 Israeli passport holders who live in the EU. I've seen some comments about there being a "new Exodus" - if that term is right, it's basically out of Israel and towards Europe. And when emigration rates to Israel are so low, many of them will be of the elderly/young relatives going to live with ageing family etc, but frankly I can't see how some at least aren't some pretty nasty politico-religious extremists who are turned on by the idea of being able to go and strut around with a machine gun in some settlement somewhere, so they ain't "fleeing" anything.

It's interesting too how the similar rise of anti-semitic activity in the USA is almost completely ignored since it doesn't fit the Hadley Freeman "Europe, your [anti-semitic] roots are showing" line - because of the generally high level of US public support for Israel.

It seems clear to me that this anti-Israel=anti-semitic thing is the new line of defence for Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians, it's the last feasible bit of moral high ground that Israel-apologists have to play with.

But it means that anyone who wants to campaign against the Israeli war machine needs to be very careful with their language.

Yep. It's playing out just as many anti-Zionist Jews said it would 60 years ago. I've just been reading the diaries of Victor Klemperer: a Jew living under the Nazis. He has absolutely no doubts about equating Zionism with Nazism, he makes the parallel repeatedly and vehemently. Which considering where and who he was is really saying something.
 
Yep. It's playing out just as many anti-Zionist Jews said it would 60 years ago. I've just been reading the diaries of Victor Klemperer: a Jew living under the Nazis. He has absolutely no doubts about equating Zionism with Nazism, he makes the parallel repeatedly and vehemently. Which considering where and who he was is really saying something.

Does he discuss Zionism in the final (chronological) volume of diaries (The Lesser Evil)?
 
I think this may be one that PD could make all the running on as it goes. Nice little sarcastic stab in the back where everyone can see.
Applauding OJ's refusal to be dragged off the bridge to rock the boat while congratulating Warsi (who we can neither confirm nor deny is a deep cover PD militant) for resigning and causing quite the stir would be multitudinous positionism par excellence.
 
copliker (also butchersapron) - I think this should do it?:

14719768008_0b612a5552_z.jpg
 
He could write his articles in the Guardian for free, thus being able to get his message out there, whilst making some form of protest. After all, if his only motive for working for them is political and making sure his radical voice is heard, he won't care a jot about the money.

He could either refuse his fee or pass on the cash to a relevant Gaza charity.

It's a perfect solution I'm sure he can't wait to endorse.
 
...and here's the boy Jones in "Guardian ad? What Guardian ad?" mode at the London Gaza demo*:



*I ran out of bloody water at this point of the speeches :mad:

e2a: I wasn't wrong about him using his phone for his speech!
 
Speaking without notes is all very dramatic and everything, but its bizarre to demand it from everyone. Criticise what he says, his right to be there, whatever - but for speaking with notes? Nah.

Have liked yr post - not out of winding you up etc - but, well, you and Fozzie B make a fair point, and it would be churlish of me not to acknowledge it!
 
what's wrong with reading notes from your phone? seems an odd thing to be laying into him about...

Afford a phone, can he? Alright for some innit.

I'm sure a few hundred Gazan infants could eat for a month for the price of his so-called "phone."

If he had a single shred of decency he'd auction it on e-bay and send the proceeds to me so I can donate them to Hamas.
 
Back
Top Bottom