Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

You've managed to confuse yourself, I'm afraid.

What you should have written is that Harringay is in Haringey.
I lived and worked in said borough for a few years, and was ignorant of the fact that the former word contained a double "r". I am stupid.
 
I had never heard of the Ladder. I have not been to that area for nearly 40 years. I now feel like I want to go again. Thanks be to The Guardian.
 
Last edited:
In an editorial advocating Michelle Mone being chucked out of the House of Lords, absolutely nothing about getting rid of the whole sorry edifice and bringing the UK into the twentieth (sic) century.
 



Woking has obviously moved if it’s now part of London.
That article also just parrots the line about sales in December being 17% higher than last year without taking a step back to think about what it means. December is traditionally a month of very, very few sales. That makes the sales figures volatile in % terms. If sales were delayed and a relatively small proportion of the ones that would normally complete in November got pushed back a few weeks, it would totally distort the December numbers. Similarly, if some houses didn’t sell in November and were kept on the market in December (rather than taken off, as is usual), the number for sale would be higher than usual. That’s why you would only normally look at sales over a longer time period than just a month.
 
That's up there with this for most utterly pointless space-filling drivel of the month.

The Buddhist Eightfold Path includes “right livelihood”, which states that people should avoid certain forms of work, including traffic in people, weapons and poison.

Good stance on recruitment consultancy.
 
It's technically from the Observer but is worthy of Dr. Jazzz.
The reason it only takes one alien to be real for it to change everything is the same reason that it only takes one ghost to be real or one Loch Ness monster or one vampire. If things aren’t real and then they are real then yes, that’s a big deal. Because, you know, not real.
 
The reason it only takes one alien to be real for it to change everything is the same reason that it only takes one ghost to be real or one Loch Ness monster or one vampire. If things aren’t real and then they are real then yes, that’s a big deal. Because, you know, not real.
But...I want to believe (the Guardian) :D

Has there ever been a 'believe'/not thread about UFOs on here?
 
The reason it only takes one alien to be real for it to change everything is the same reason that it only takes one ghost to be real or one Loch Ness monster or one vampire. If things aren’t real and then they are real then yes, that’s a big deal. Because, you know, not real.

Surely they are completely different. Alien life should be taken for granted, given that the number of exoplanets in the observable universe is of a similar order of magnitude to the number of stars.

Alien life which is capable of interstellar travel and which considers our planet worth the hassle of exploratory visits is however extremely unlikely. But it’s not logically impossible in the way that ghosts and vampires and other undead entities are logically impossible if the terms “alive” and “dead” are meaningful (and mutually exclusive). Ghosts and vampires are an affront to good sense.

I’d be happy to bracket cryptozoological entities, including the LNM, alongside alien visitors as extremely implausible but not nonsensical. Which means that evidence of their existence wouldn’t “change everything” in the way that a transmurally ambulant ghost would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PTK
Surely they are completely different. Alien life should be taken for granted, given that the number of exoplanets in the observable universe is of a similar order of magnitude to the number of stars.

Alien life which is capable of interstellar travel and which considers our planet worth the hassle of exploratory visits is however extremely unlikely. But it’s not logically impossible in the way that ghosts and vampires and other undead entities are logically impossible if the terms “alive” and “dead” are meaningful (and mutually exclusive). Ghosts and vampires are an affront to good sense.

I’d be happy to bracket cryptozoological entities, including the LNM, alongside alien visitors as extremely implausible but not nonsensical. Which means that evidence of their existence wouldn’t “change everything” in the way that a transmurally ambulant ghost would.
I don’t know. Extending the plausible idea of alien life through the myriad layers needed to get to the point of believing that:
  • it is so incredibly technologically advanced that it has flown unknowable distances in unknowable ways
  • and found this speck of a planet to approach, but
  • for some reason has died, and
  • been found but covered up by the same incompetent governments that can’t keep a simple leaving party secret
  • for decades after decades

Stretches plausibility at least as far as the idea that there might be something we don’t know yet about the laws of entropy that causes ghosts. Or, to put it another way, past any kind of plausibility
 
Back
Top Bottom