Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
That's a minute or two you wasted finding that image. There's no argument here. It's a simple fact that Haringey is not and never has been an inner london borough.
That's a minute or two you wasted finding that image. There's no argument here. It's a simple fact that Haringey is not and never has been an inner london borough.
20 seconds. You're very welcomeThat's a minute or two you wasted finding that image. There's no argument here. It's a simple fact that Haringey is not and never has been an inner london borough.
The Office for National Statistics and Eurostat define Inner London differently. They include Haringey and Newham, but not Greenwich. So everyone's right, or wrong, depending on how you look at it.for most purposes, 'inner london' is (with minor tinkering at the edges) the area of the 1889 london county council - the area north of the river is much smaller than south of the river, covering the current boroughs of (from the west) hammersmith + fulham, kensington + chelsea, westminster, camden, islington, hackney, tower hamlets.
before 1889, all of these except the 'square mile' city of london were in middlesex (south london was either surrey or kent.)
today's haringey borough was in middlesex until 1965, and places east of the river lea (canning town, stratford and so on) were in essex.
south of the river, the LCC area extended out to include current lambeth, southwark, lewisham and greenwich boroughs, so goes out to places like plumstead, abbey wood and crystal palace.
i'm sure it all made sense in 1889
Potato potato.The Office for National Statistics and Eurostat define Inner London differently. They include Haringey and Newham, but not Greenwich. So everyone's right, or wrong, depending on how you look at it.
View attachment 404596
you'd expect haringey to know if they're inner or outer london. and eurostat? really?
that's a really shit post, ignoring that there are or have been mayoral funds available to inner london boroughs outer london ones don't receive. The ons may lump haringey in with the likes of hackney but that doesn't butter any parsnipsGo argue with the Office for National Statistics. Preferably for the rest of your life
According to the ONS, Greater London Urban Area includes St Albans.Potato potato.
So, if we are to accept the ONS classing Haringey as inner London, the we have to accept St Albans as part of London.
Honestly have no idea what any of this is about. Are they on the Monopoly board?So, if we are to accept the ONS classing Haringey as inner London, the we have to accept St Albans as part of London.
There is no the monopoly board. There are loads of monopoly boards, I've a grimsby one for example.Honestly have no idea what any of this is about. Are they on the Monopoly board?
Aye, they’re not on the Grimsby board but.There is no the monopoly board. There are loads of monopoly boards, I've a grimsby one for example.
Lies damned lies and statisticsSo, if we are to accept the ONS classing Haringey as inner London, the we have to accept St Albans as part of London.
I thought that London was part of Greater Brighton.The ONS are just functionaries of neoliberalism - why should we accept their definitions? I don't want to rub it in but every sensible person knows that London's southern border is the north bank of the Thames. Yet they persist in defining Metropolitan Kent and Metropolitan Surrey as part of London. Ridiculous.
You seem to be invested in this beyond any reasonable bounds if you're going to come out with bollocks like thatStatistically, you're human, but not in any meaningful sense of the word.
Er...this may challenge your Nordcentric, metropolitan attitude?The ONS are just functionaries of neoliberalism - why should we accept their definitions? I don't want to rub it in but every sensible person knows that London's southern border is the north bank of the Thames. Yet they persist in defining Metropolitan Kent and Metropolitan Surrey as part of London. Ridiculous.
Honestly have no idea what any of this is about. Are they on the Monopoly board?
Capitalists' world view of the people's part of the conurbationThere is only one location on the Monopoly board of London that is south of the river.
There is only one location on the Monopoly board of London that is south of the river.
From the source of the Thames, to Leigh on-Sea, all of London will be free.I feel like I need to unleash my innerpickersPickman's model here and say that that it depends which river you’re referring to.
No parts of London are south of the river Nile for example