Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

You might expect from this article about a man of Indian heritage adopted into a white family and travelling around India for the first time that there be interesting reflections on identity and belonging.
I wasn't expecting that, because I know he's the consumer field test dude who got moved into doing the amusing regular magazine features šŸ¤·
 
In next week's thrilling installment, Tim Dowling - who has been on holiday in the same area with his own family and appears from the other direction - stops, and is equally rubbish. No tyres are fixed, everyone is swept up in a freak locust storm, a planet-devouring rip in time appears in the sky above, sucking all and sundry into it, until nothing remains. Except Polly Toynbee, who blames it on Corbyn.
 
Zoe Williams is annoying because she is capable of writing some decent stuff if she puts her mind to it but generally chooses not to.
her foray into politics was backing owen smith over corbyn
seems to have retreated after that into Kids Say The Funniest Things and Isnt Going On Holiday Really Hard dross
 
getting annoyed by the Lifestyle section is funny to me.
it's like picking up Hello magazine and complaining that it's exactly what you'd expect from that.
just don't read it. stick to the news pages & the crossword
 
What a load of bilge. Jesus, it's just a fucking puncture. She wasn't in a car that swerved to avoid going off a cliff then overturned and the roof collapsed in on those inside... then the driver got taken to hospital while the concussed passengers got left by the roadside to hithike to the nearest town.

That happened to me... but I don't write for the Guardian.
 
I've only just noticed they've added a limit to free articles - but it looks like only on the app. So it's free unlimited reading on the website but max 50 on the app. So at some point every month I'll have to tell Chrome not to open links in the app...
 
Really well researched long charge sheet here worth reading in full...a popular view of British military and foreign policy
....
 
Last edited:
Not sure what to think about Guardian style guide dictating sub-eds capitalise Black and not white. Seems a bit weird. When did this begin happening? I mean either do both or neither.

And no I'm not an anti-woke or whatever, it's just quite jarring as a designer and therefore also a proof-reader.


A white man, armed with a high-powered rifle and a handgun entered the discount store just before 2pm and shot and killed two men and one woman, before fatally shooting himself. All three victims are Black.
 
Not sure what to think about Guardian style guide dictating sub-eds capitalise Black and not white. Seems a bit weird. When did this begin happening? I mean either do both or neither.

And no I'm not an anti-woke or whatever, it's just quite jarring as a designer and therefore also a proof-reader.

Followed a few US titles a while back now. I remember reading the Nytimes (maybe) explanation for why they did it but still didn't really buy it. I think it was to do with a group of people who have a shared global experience due to being black that doesn't apply to being white.
 
The style guide doesnā€™t actually ā€˜dictateā€™ capitalising the B.

black
should be used only as an adjective when referring to race, ie not ā€œblacksā€ but ā€œblack peopleā€ or whatever noun is appropriate. There is debate about the capitalisation of black, with some using it as a physical descriptor, others to describe a specific cultural group, therefore while generally lower case, if a subject, writer or editor of a story prefers to use Black then that choice should be respected. (See also BAME.)
 
Back
Top Bottom