Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

if there was one demographic I would have thought would specifically seek cruelty-free elephant sanctuaries that don't do riding for tourists, I would have thought that was Guardian readers.
I know I did when I was in Thailand.
 
I jumped to the same conclusion as Bell’s editors without having read their exchange.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that the intent was only to reference the LBJ cartoon, not Shylock.

but then either he was too blind to see that far more people would be familiar with the latter and interpret it that way, or he knew but went ahead anyway without changing things up. either way, can't see why the bosses would want to keep a liability like that on the payroll.
 
if there was one demographic I would have thought would specifically seek cruelty-free elephant sanctuaries that don't do riding for tourists, I would have thought that was Guardian readers.
I know I did when I was in Thailand.
That’s a bit of the point really. The impeccable liberal credentials of many Guardian readers are veneer thin.
 
Making a dumb elephant-related mistake when you're a 24-year-old backpacker and switching from a career in HR to working with "patients in private and NHS practice, specialising in palliative care, pain management and psycho-oncology" doesn't seem like such a bad redemption arc.

Though this is a weird assertion:

Elephant attacks in Thailand are rare. The national parks department recorded 135 human fatalities between 2016 and 2022: an average of about 22 a year, despite approximately 3,800 “working” animals still kept in captivity today.

I don't think you can call elephant attacks "rare" when people are getting killed by elephants at a rate close to one every two weeks, unless you're from somewhere where people are getting trampled in the street by elephants on a daily basis
 
Though this is a weird assertion:

Elephant attacks in Thailand are rare. The national parks department recorded 135 human fatalities between 2016 and 2022: an average of about 22 a year, despite approximately 3,800 “working” animals still kept in captivity today.

I don't think you can call elephant attacks "rare" when people are getting killed by elephants at a rate close to one every two weeks, unless you're from somewhere where people are getting trampled in the street by elephants on a daily basis
There are around about 3,800 pupils enrolled in Chippenham's three secondary schools. I'm fairly sure that if on average 22 teachers were killed by them each year that would not be considered rare
 
made her realise two things, Jones says: “Life can change in a heartbeat and you never see it coming, and there are points in life when we’re completely alone and powerless. You can’t escape those things – they are human problems – so what do you do? I wanted to understand how to work with that.”
Life can also teach you you should not ride elephants, which should have been the moral to the story.
 
The subheading of this article was amended on 26 October 2023 to correct a misspelling of Richard Roundtree’s name.

to not even spell someone’s name correctly in their obituary is just sad. no respect.
 
If the guardian reported the Palestine demo yesterday I blinked and missed it. The biggest anti-war demo since the Iraq War and they've not featured it on the website front page that I can see.
 
The headline often misrepresents the article, so I thought, go on then - surely this piece can't be as bad as it sounds, even for Polly Toynbee. It pretty much is.

She talks about how horrific the situation is for the people of Gaza. But then she says that Labour can't do anything about it so what's the point in them saying aught really. Can't be having any disagreement with Kid Starver. She's a disgrace.

What an irony if Labour damages its election chances by falling apart over something an opposition can’t influence.

Labour calling for a ceasefire would achieve nothing. So why should it tear itself apart over this?
 
Back
Top Bottom