Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

I know which thread this is and what it's about, but still: am amazed how many posts about them using "Nice" instead of "NICE" with almost none about what the article and headline is actually about!

I mean, I know Nice/NICE and the NHS is institutionally racist, as is medicine/healthcare overall, but I still find it shocking, the content of this article. Shocking and enraging, and worthy of a post.

I hope there's more to it, but it seems, from the other categories included, to be a blanket recommendation based on higher maternal deaths without taking into account the reasons for them. Recommending advising early induction - and it is only advising, at least - makes more sense for the other categories (over age 35 and with a high BMI) - because there are actual medical reasons for that. It would still be dubious to suggest early induction without any other medical reasons, but at least it's because those circumstances have do sometimes actually cause complications during childbirth.

For people who are from all the huge number of non-white categories included there wouldn't be any actual medical reason. just societal. That's very different.

Blind reliance on statistics does not make for good medical guidance.

(Tries to defy urge to point out the alternative meaning of ‘nice’ isn’t a noun. Fails)

Still can't help myself - if it's NICE, the organisation, then it is a noun.
 
This is the article Dawn Foster wrote, that led Tom Watson to have her sacked by them.
I've seen this claim a lot on twitter in the last 24 hours - does it have any evidence to back it up, or is it just the timing of her sacking being relatively close to this article being written (some two months after it was published)?
 
I've seen this claim a lot on twitter in the last 24 hours - does it have any evidence to back it up, or is it just the timing of her sacking being relatively close to this article being written (some two months after it was published)?
It was the last article by her they published, and I assume she must have stated this herself given the widespread claim. She discusses The Guardian in this podcast - (not listened to it yet)
 
It was the last article by her they published, and I assume she must have stated this herself given the widespread claim. She discusses The Guardian in this podcast - (not listened to it yet)

she tackles the Tom Watson article about 35 minutes in. sounds like a bleak place to work tbf
 
It’ll be rejoining the single market / EEA first anyway. Nobody with any political sense will be screaming to go back in feet first.
 
What a stinker of a piece Labour must say it out loud: Brexit needs to be reversed

It's possible to make an argument to rejoin the EU, but it is not possible for this man to make an argument to rejoin the EU that anyone but guardian/observer towers would listen to.
The thing about brexit is it can't be reversed. We will never have again the deal we had on 22 June 2016. If we rejoin the EU we will never regain the rebate. We will have to forfeit the pound. The influence we formerly enjoyed in Brussels will no longer exist. Our reaccession will not be the return of the prodigal son but the scuttling in of a much chastened child forced to return to the parental home
 
1627408432179.png
it's this sort of thing i really object to, the last sentence in my snip. which sounds like some liberal wankstain is preaching to you (which of course they are). in any real newspaper they would have left off the 'and given that', taken out the comma and replaced it with so.

e2a: and the middle sentence in the paragraph isn't all that either
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom