Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

Guardian goes up the pan slightly, I received a reply:

Dear Platinumsage, thank you for your email.

"Nice" is the correct way of referring to the body, as per our style guide, which advises that only the initial letter is capitalised for acronyms (abbreviations that themselves are spoken as words - eg Nasa, Unicef, Rada).

However, I think our editors should use common sense in this specific case, and Nice should not be used at the beginning of a headline or subheading, as these are the only places where the acronym could be confused with the word "nice", devoid of further context provided by the body text.

I passed this query on to the relevant production editor, who arranged for it to be changed.
as anyone whose toilet has ever overflowed will tell you, something moving up the pan is to be deplored.
 
Guardian goes up the pan slightly, I received a reply:

Dear Platinumsage, thank you for your email.

"Nice" is the correct way of referring to the body, as per our style guide, which advises that only the initial letter is capitalised for acronyms (abbreviations that themselves are spoken as words - eg Nasa, Unicef, Rada).

However, I think our editors should use common sense in this specific case, and Nice should not be used at the beginning of a headline or subheading, as these are the only places where the acronym could be confused with the word "nice", devoid of further context provided by the body text.

I passed this query on to the relevant production editor, who arranged for it to be changed.
Unicef itself writes it out as Unicef. (Which is another guardian style guide rule, follow the organisations usage)
If they are following the style guide of adopting the usage of the body in question, they should be writing it as NICE. And, I believe, NASA.
 
Guardian goes up the pan slightly, I received a reply:

Dear Platinumsage, thank you for your email.

"Nice" is the correct way of referring to the body, as per our style guide, which advises that only the initial letter is capitalised for acronyms (abbreviations that themselves are spoken as words - eg Nasa, Unicef, Rada).

However, I think our editors should use common sense in this specific case, and Nice should not be used at the beginning of a headline or subheading, as these are the only places where the acronym could be confused with the word "nice", devoid of further context provided by the body text.

I passed this query on to the relevant production editor, who arranged for it to be changed.
VINDICATION
 
NICE also use all caps for their acronym, so the Guardian wasn't correctly following it's own guidance to start with (do what the organisation under discussion does).
 
If they are following the style guide of adopting the usage of the body in question, they should be writing it as NICE. And, I believe, NASA.
So they do. The ‘acronym’rule must take precedence for them.

(the independent and times of India seem to be the only ones who follow the guardian re Nasa, btw. My phone tries to insist on capitalising it).
 
Just reading that Dawn Foster, formerly of the graun, has died suddenly. Binning her was one of their more egregious recent down-the-pan activities. Surprisingly sad about it tbh, she was sound.
Been quite ill of late hasn't she?
 
That’s pretty sad, one of the few people I followed on Twitter back when I was active there and she seemed pretty grounded politically, and I don’t think from particularly privileged roots, probably unusual at the graun. Don’t get may voices like that in the ‘mainstream’. A good human.
 

I know which thread this is and what it's about, but still: am amazed how many posts about them using "Nice" instead of "NICE" with almost none about what the article and headline is actually about!

I mean, I know Nice/NICE and the NHS is institutionally racist, as is medicine/healthcare overall, but I still find it shocking, the content of this article. Shocking and enraging, and worthy of a post.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom