Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

It's regrettable that anything I'd like to say on the matter (eg buck-passing knbohead) would be moderated to meaninglessness.

Yeah, I gave up posting on there some years ago for that very reason, among others.

One thing I did notice was that he totally omitted to mention the fact that many of the E15Focus families were likely to be rehoused hundreds of miles away. Still, out of sight, out of mind, eh?
 
New Guardian survey manages to express typical Graun half-measures in form of poorly-expressed monitoring question:

rightongrauniad.jpg
 
what happened to her sojourn in america?
She's still there - these days all the penniless working class students with a strong brand commute across the Atlantic whenever a monetisation or brand-building opportunity comes up.

She's on the guestlist for Amanda Palmer's book launch party in November - Nazi fancy dress optional:

 
She's still there - these days all the penniless working class students with a strong brand commute across the Atlantic whenever a monetisation or brand-building opportunity comes up.

She's on the guestlist for Amanda Palmer's book launch party in November - Nazi fancy dress optional:


is prince harry going then?
 
Today The Guardian published an article by Hannah Giorgis headlined "The problem with the west's Ebola response is still fear of a black patient". As well as containing 16 uses of the journalistic "we" (such as "We will tweet about how much more terrifying Ebola is than black-eyed ghost children." and "We will try to hide our fear behind jokes with dying black bodies as their punchlines.") the article contains the following statement:

Liberia is perilously under-resourced to deal with the outbreak, and the United States has perhaps ominously committed only military personnel there.

http://www.donotlink.com/c2r3

The United States has committed military personnel to the area of West Africa worst affected by the current Ebola epidemic. They are there to build 17 treatment units which contain 100 beds each. The US military has also "deployed three mobile laboratories to assess whether individuals with symptoms actually have the Ebola. U.S. troops with training in infectious diseases test samples for presence of the virus, cutting the time it takes to determine whether a patient is infected from a few days to a few hours". The US military will also "help to distribute food aid" in Liberia.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...to-complete-ebola-treatment-units-in-liberia/

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/us-military-liberia-fight-ebola

Why is The Guardian going down the pan? Perhaps it is because it is a dishonest newspaper which publishes dishonest articles by dishonest writers.
 
I think the scales were lifted from my eyes during the post 9/11 period and the coverage of the war in Iraq. For a short time I bought the Guardian and the Independent and gap between their coverage of the war was astonishing! I decided then to stop wasting my money and just bought the Indie.
 
Graunid article wanking over Nick Clegg's wife, the rich daughter of a Francoist mayor.

BTW I totally missed this puff piece from the Graunid actually praising the Francoist mayor. Some absolutely shockingly far-right history is cited in that article uncontested by any opposing views or reality,

"It is complicated," said Enrique Berzal, professor of history at the University of Valladolid. "González was a classic hard-right figure. Democracy came about in Spain because pro-Francoists decided to move to democracy when they saw what was coming [after the dictator's death]. He was certainly no anti-fascist democrat, but nor was he a simple Francoist. His political culture was certainly not democratic. The recent history of Spain cannot be simply framed as good versus evil."

Nothing to do with increased militancy or a car bomb killing off Franco's appointed heir?
 
Coming in The Guardian as soon as someone manages to half-finish an article:

Oscar Pistorius got off lightly because he's a man

Oscar Pistorius got off lightly because he's white

Oscar Pistorius got off lightly because he's rich

Oscar Pistorius got off lightly because the black female judge has internalised racism and misogyny and is no better than Jeremy Clarkson and that bloke who was kicked out of UKIP
 
Never mind the politics of that article 3% of over 55s and upto 10% of 18+ people think corporations are bad therefore that represents a big shift caused by two TV shows? It's hard to point to a single sensible or interesting point in that article
 
Unless gideon has developed an overly long, hairier toned and tanned arm....I'd say he wasn't "using" a nail gun there, but merely hanging onto it whilst a worker used it.

2f3b5472-87fa-426e-ae37-991179b2b035_zps0c75f190.png
 
Back
Top Bottom