I wonder if they only voted against the bedroom tax because they knew that the vote to abolish it wouldn't actually pass.
Clegg abstained ffs!
What do you want?And yet Labour just sit there, behind Miliband's consumptive joyless rictus, and compete for the same votes over the same policies. Reeves might well repeal the BT (or so she claims), but the's also promised to be tougher on welfare than the tories. If that's even possible! I don't get why people lik John McDonell and Jeremy Corbyn even bother.
What do you mean by 'a policy pledge'?Labour now hiding behind the informal agreement of 'pairing', which is only ever used for non-essential votes. http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/pairing/
I guess they did not deem the vote of real importance despite it being a policy pledge in 2015. They are a bunch of cowards.
It isnt. It's absolutely standard, used for all sorts of votes.which is only ever used for non-essential votes. http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/pairing/
It's a weird point for rose to pick up on. As you say, it's bog standard. The only one who doesn't is Skinner.It isnt. It's absolutely standard, used for all sorts of votes.
Yup. very occasionally one side will announce pairing is suspended, but only on things where they think they could actually bring the oppo down.It's a weird point for rose to pick up on. As you say, it's bog standard. The only one who doesn't is Skinner.
Yup. very occasionally one side will announce pairing is suspended, but only on things where they think they could actually bring the oppo down.
Yep, as in 1979.
AFAIAA votes of Confidence are never paired.
Sort of like what he said.AFAIAA votes of Confidence are never paired.
LOLWhat do you want?
LOL
You're obsessed with political polling; what do YOU want?
We all know they work to targets even though they lied about them working to targets. All this government does is lie and steal, they are sociopaths.
populated by people only a minority of whom have any understanding or experience of what life is like for the working class. it's an issue about the institution of government itself.
Of course work and wealth factor. Do you think the people that you listed are there by dint of ambition alone?Absolutely, but I wonder if it's even worse than that? Too many politicians these days have lived and breathed politics since childhood. Just look at Hague, Miliband, and Cameron. And they've not stepped outside politics their entire lives, or at best only briefly. It's as if there's a new incipient divide: the political class vs the non-political class; work and wealth don't factor.
Absolutely, but I wonder if it's even worse than that? Too many politicians these days have lived and breathed politics since childhood. Just look at Hague, Miliband, and Cameron. And they've not stepped outside politics their entire lives, or at best only briefly. It's as if there's a new incipient divide: the political class vs the non-political class; work and wealth don't factor.
what's the point of voting against it then? Last night's vote was hardly surprising, but just as disappointing. Clegg abstained ffs! What's the point of him? Literally his existence is meaningless; an evolutionary political cul de sac.
Wealth and what it can buy (including appropriate "work") or facilitate (access to networks) is a predominant factor in entry into the political class. it's always been the case that it was a factor, but now is the main driver for entry. Parliament itself is as much of an exclusive club for the monied classes as it ever was, even 150 years ago. Hague, Milliband and Cameron wouldn't have had the leisure to pursue politics as a career without wealth and what it buys.
That simply beggars belief. It was THEIR policy. But then when Labour councils are among those at the sharp edge of cutting services, it's hardly news. Name and shame.Just read that Labour lost by 26 votes last night and 47 Labour MPs didn't even bother to turn up. Right, so instead of actually doing something to help the most vulnerable people in society affected by an extremely vicious social policy they don't bother and actually sink their own motion. That is why Labour are scum.