A number 1 if ever I heard one
Millwall Football Club have admitted for the first time that they may be forced to leave their south London home and relocate to Kent should the seizure of their land go ahead. Lewisham council’s plan to compulsorily purchase areas around the Den and sell them on to a mysterious offshore developer with connections to the current Labour administration has already drawn both disbelief and mass protest.
It's auld hunter hoeyEither she's too thick to look up the UNHCR stats or check Wikipedia or she's a racist shit. Though its probably both tbh.
It's auld hunter hoey
He'll be able to spend the weekend blocking a whole load more folk, now.
just seen this for the first time - mind boggled . They don't really come much worse than Hoey do they[/QUOTE
And to think Labour hq tried to stop her all those years ago because she had been in the IMG for a couple of weeks.
Like Field she has become a Tory.
The second of these is the most obviously confusing. The main questions here have always seemed to be essentially political. Is it right for Lewisham’s cabinet to award half a million pounds of public money to a charity of which its mayor is a director, and which exists as an arm of a private development?
Is it right for a local authority to enter into an agreement over the sale of public land with an opaque offshore developer?
The inquiry feels like a way of calling a ceasefire in a process that had become deeply troubling for Lewisham council
These are not issues of criminality or corruption. They are more a matter of what the public can expect rather than demand from its elected officials. Is it right that the last Labour mayor of Lewisham, a founding director of the developer Renewal, has already had the opportunity to make a profit out of this scheme by selling his own shares in Renewal once the New Bermondsey scheme had been given time to brew? Does this behaviour raise concerns among Labour voters and local people? Does it give the impression of public officials being seen to be held to the very highest standards?
He's got a poison combination of a) dreadful harman type politics b) a complete lack of any charisma and c) not being liked by locals thoughThere's no reason why he can't hold that seat if he gets behind the manifesto at the next election. A Brexit Party candidate spoiling should help him across the line.
No. He probably won't do anything tbh, one way or another, he manages to largely be completely anonymous at all times even in his constituencyI'm guessing he's not going to get behind the manifesto then?
He's got a poison combination of a) dreadful harman type politics b) a complete lack of any charisma and c) not being liked by locals though
God I've got all this to look forward to then when I move across the borderPlus theres the effect of what Wrexham Council have been up to the past thirty-odd years - taking what was the nicest High Street going, with three flourishing, well-attended and beautiful markets and destroying almost all of it (to varying degrees) at a cost of several hundred million pounds. They've wrecked that town, and I really do not blame anyone who would vote against them as a result of it.
Aye, well labour being unable to take control of council for years now in a town that historically has been as solidly labour as they come tells it's own story on that front. Most w/c orientated councillors in wrexham these days are plaid (harper, jones) or independent (bithell - johnstown) Absolute shower.Plus theres the effect of what Wrexham Council have been up to the past thirty-odd years - taking what was the nicest High Street going, with three flourishing, well-attended and beautiful markets and destroying almost all of it (to varying degrees) at a cost of several hundred million pounds. They've wrecked that town, and I really do not blame anyone who would vote against them as a result of it.