I want to know about this case with her brother. Is the unnamed child the one she has adopted as her own? Are her parents simply trying to protect her biological brother or is she the one who has lied here?
I haven't watched the interview with her yet and from the reactions here it's probably gonna annoy me...I am though really taken with 'when' she started to masuerade as a Black woman. It clearly wasn't when she was suing Howard Uni for discrimination because she was White. Her husband, well he clearly didn't like her mimicking either.
You know what if she was coming at this as a thing she did to protect herself and the kid because of prejudice or to make a new life for them because of the past (her brother's sexual abuse etc) I would find her a little more believable.
The issues in what I am seeing at the moment is someone who has identified with Black people and the 'struggle' , felt comfortable as a White woman (because of her family background) to identify with, have relationships with Black people, study at a historically Black university, etch out a name for herself, clearly work hard to gain the position and trust she did but she did that by also concocting an absolutely ugly backstory that draws on the real life trauma of others. It's like she has studied this stuff and now she thinks she owns it. It didn't happen to her and to say it did is the biggest insult to injury. She is unapologetic and keeps piling it on.
I have some thoughts on this 'manipulating of her adoptive son and encouraging anti-White racism' in him...I am gonna hold on to them for now to let them settle...