What stupid shit has Trump done today?
- Thread starter Yossarian
- Start date
Yossarian
⏭️
According to the House committee's report, Trump wanted to trademark "rigged election" a few days after he lost the election. 
On November 9, 2020, then-Trump aide Dan Scavino emailed Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, with the request from Trump.
“Hey Jared! POTUS wants to trademark/own rights to below, I don’t know who to see – or ask…I don’t know who to take to,” the email from Scavino reads, according to a transcript of Kushner’s testimony to the committee, which was released by the panel on Friday.
Two phrases were bolded in the email: “Save America PAC!” and “Rigged Election!”
www.cnn.com
On November 9, 2020, then-Trump aide Dan Scavino emailed Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, with the request from Trump.
“Hey Jared! POTUS wants to trademark/own rights to below, I don’t know who to see – or ask…I don’t know who to take to,” the email from Scavino reads, according to a transcript of Kushner’s testimony to the committee, which was released by the panel on Friday.
Two phrases were bolded in the email: “Save America PAC!” and “Rigged Election!”
Trump wanted to trademark 'Rigged Election!' and other key findings from the Jan. 6 panel's latest release | CNN Politics
The House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, on Friday released another wave of witness interview transcripts.
gosub
~#
Tbf he didn't invent election rigging but quite a ballsy admission by him that he had interests in that regardAccording to the House committee's report, Trump wanted to trademark "rigged election" a few days after he lost the election.
On November 9, 2020, then-Trump aide Dan Scavino emailed Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, with the request from Trump.
“Hey Jared! POTUS wants to trademark/own rights to below, I don’t know who to see – or ask…I don’t know who to take to,” the email from Scavino reads, according to a transcript of Kushner’s testimony to the committee, which was released by the panel on Friday.
Two phrases were bolded in the email: “Save America PAC!” and “Rigged Election!”
Trump wanted to trademark 'Rigged Election!' and other key findings from the Jan. 6 panel's latest release | CNN Politics
The House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, on Friday released another wave of witness interview transcripts.
moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
if it permanently fractures the GOP it will be a sight to see
Seems to be a GOP internal spat about the speakers vote going on.
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
Trump mistook rape accuser E Jean Carroll for ex-wife, deposition shows
Excerpts show former president was corrected by lawyer when shown picture of himself with Carroll in the 1990swww.theguardian.com
Rape isn't really about attraction.
Raheem
Well-Known Member
No, but it's helpful all the same, if you're suing someone, to have them undermine themselves.
I very much doubt that Trump has any real chance of being president ever again and he's now falling out with his evangelical voting base
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
Am I supposed to go along with a myth about rape that does enormous harm to women, just so Trump can undermine himself a little bit?
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
His entire contention furthers that myth, which many people tend to believe as it is.
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
No need to apologize or delete, I'm just making a point to make sure everyone understands how pervasive these myths are.
Raheem
Well-Known Member
Fine and good. But the thing is about him saying one thing and then undermining it. It is about his honesty and candour in front of the court, just the fact it reflects badly on him. I doubt anyone here thinks he's blown a potentially credible defence.
In scathing ruling, US district court judge writes, ‘misuse of the courts by Mr Trump and his lawyers undermines the rule of law’
“We are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” Middlebrooks wrote in the 46-page order imposing sanctions of $937,989.39 against Trump and Habba.
Link
“We are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” Middlebrooks wrote in the 46-page order imposing sanctions of $937,989.39 against Trump and Habba.
Link
a_chap
When the world came apart, where were you?
"Trump and Habba – as well as her law firm Habba, Madaio and Associates – are jointly liable for the $1m penalty, though the former president indicated to associates that he essentially believed it should be paid by his attorney instead of him, according to sources familiar with the matter."
Something tells me Habba will have to sue Trump for the money.
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
"Trump and Habba – as well as her law firm Habba, Madaio and Associates – are jointly liable for the $1m penalty, though the former president indicated to associates that he essentially believed it should be paid by his attorney instead of him, according to sources familiar with the matter."
Something tells me Habba will have to sue Trump for the money.
I'll never understand why anyone would agree to work for Trump. You won't get paid. You'll probably end up with criminal charges or fines. You might lose your law license, as so many have.
DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
"We can't afford to pay you but it will be great exposure"
Yuwipi Woman
Whack-A-Mole Queen
"We can't afford to pay you but it will be great exposure"
Having gone to art school, I've never heard that before.
Yossarian
⏭️
"We can't afford to pay you but it will be great exposure"
"You'll learn a lot from highly experienced colleagues on your team"
DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
hang Pence?
Nylock
I hate 'these days'...
"BUT CLINTON'S EMAILS!!!!" "AND HUNTER'S LAPTOP!!!!"
etc.
Raheem
Well-Known Member
I believe there are two schools of thought.
1) Biden and Pence took documents to protect Satanist paedophiles. Trump took documents as part of his lifelong quest to expose Satanist paedophiles. This is all true regardless of what the documents actually were, because what they actually were is a cover-up and fake news.
2) Trump took documents he thought he could sell. Pence took documents that he thought might help his defence. Biden has no memory as to what documents he took and why.
1) Biden and Pence took documents to protect Satanist paedophiles. Trump took documents as part of his lifelong quest to expose Satanist paedophiles. This is all true regardless of what the documents actually were, because what they actually were is a cover-up and fake news.
2) Trump took documents he thought he could sell. Pence took documents that he thought might help his defence. Biden has no memory as to what documents he took and why.
Similar threads
- Poll
