Dillinger4
Es gibt Zeit
Why do you spend your time climbing inside peoples bottoms? It was the editor the other day!
Is that really all you have?
(((exosulates case)))
Why do you spend your time climbing inside peoples bottoms? It was the editor the other day!
eople believe whatever they are told, especially if told so by authority figures, without processing it to be sure that it is an accurate representation of the real world around them.
Nor do I!
No, you said that it definitively wasn't, not that it might not be. It there in black and white in that link. You said in response to another posters saying "i dont' think any of that is exactly antisemitism. mental it might be, but not antisemitic"
Now, if you've changed your mind since that thread then that's a good thing. But there's clearly some considerable distance to travel yet if you genuinely believe that it's 'debatable' as to whether the protocols of the elders of zion is anti-semitic or not.
Why all these small lies?
Is that really all you have?
(((exosulates case)))
All I am saying is, follow your own path.
No, you agreed that it wasn't anti-semitic ('i dont' think any of that is exactly antisemitism.'), that bit you agreed with -that's why you removed ther rest of the quote you were agreeing with. Never mind, i don't expect you to admit even though it's there in B&W, but others can click the linsk and see for themselves.
This still leaves you thinking that it's 'debatable' as to whether the protocols are anti-semitic. That's a pretty ignorant position to take in all honesty, there's no shaes of grey on this issue. (I fully expcet you'll deny saying even this in a few minutes)
No, that is not what you are saying.
You are saying follow your path, or be a 'sheeple'.
You are either exosculate, the free thinking minority of one, or not even human.
Its not ignorant at all, you live in a land of black and white that is the problem with you not me. There are shades of grey here.
Free the sheeps eh!
Ok then. What are the shades of grey concerning the protocols of the elders of zion please?
*prepares for dissapearing act*
There are a minority of interesting thinkers in a vast sea of blandness!
You are not one of them.
That is a favoured tactic.
Put thy tongue back in.
That really is all you have, isn't it? It comes across as well, kind of petty.
Once again:
(((exosculates argument)))
Yes, uber-mensch.
I think Nietzsche is far more interesting than Marx.
I'm sure you rolled over earlier and showed Butchers your belly.
Can i see ya belly, good boy, go on, there you go.
Its up to you to prove a positive not me prove a negative.
What exactly is anti-semetic about it?
You said there were shades of grey, tell me what they are. It's plain that you don't know the first thing about them - if you did you wouldn't say something so daft. (I did inlcude a link above to help you, but you evidently didn't bother even briefly loking at it or doing the most basic of research). As it stands there a great big question mark hanging over your head, as there is anyone who thinks it's 'debatable' if the protocols were/are anti-semitic.
A forged document designed explicitly to whip up anti-semitism during a time of widespread pogroms, rampant black hundreds and naked anti-semitism throughout eastern and central europe. A document that claims that the jews are behind every bad thing over the last 1000 years, that accuses themk of countless heinous crimes and claims that they're still manouvering to put their evil plans into operation. A forgery that formed the central core of the anti-jewish beliefs of the leading circles of the NSDAP and neo-nazis ever since. You think there's some 'shades of grey' abpuit this? That it's anti-semitic intent and effect is 'debatable'?
Ok, there's why it's anti-semitic. Let's see you argue why there are shades of grey in it and where it's anti-semitic nature is 'debatable'. Not that you will, you'll just post another content free teenage-nietzschean whinge (though it's clear you don't actually understand Nietzsche beyond some bowlderised sheeple nonsense - another forgery taken up by the NSDAP as well, lots of links here aren't there)
The new confused you is really swimming in the filth.
As predicted. Your inability to respond substantively is telling.
It takes someone actually saying something for there to be real disagreement. You're not saying anything. You just running. Fair enough. If that's what you need to do.