nino_savatte
No pasaran!
I totally agree, but the best way for the parties to ensure that they get intakes of polite drones is to "get 'em young".
Wasn't Pitt the Embryo quite young when he became and MP?
I totally agree, but the best way for the parties to ensure that they get intakes of polite drones is to "get 'em young".
Are drones anything like sheeple?
Wasn't Pitt the Embryo quite young when he became and MP?
You're projecting again, you tiresome little turd.
no i think it is clear for all an sundry to see that to question your intelligence is far from a projection
A couple of points:
1) There's no poster called "vegansmac".?
2) Thread search throws up five references to "conspiraloons" on this thread.Two posted by you, and three posts quoting yours. None by butchersapron.
In my book that makes you a liar.?
Some more points:
?
1) Name-calling people that you are accusing of "slurs and smears" is the work of a fool. You undermine any case you might have thought you had.?
2) I'd love to see any evidence of the posters you name using "the issue of mental illness to stifle debate"..?
3) Could you please support your last sentence with any kind of evidence that the people you call "one line wonders" say or do anything that might promote recruitment by the right.".?
You see, I'd absolutely hate for people to think that you, the great and pure "brasicritique", based their tirades entirely on "slurs and smears".?
That'd probably be insightful if it made any sense at all.
What cards?
Is this the latest smear you've constructed, people and cards?
How do you think these things up?
There's a problem with that statement: you are in no position to question anyone's intelligence, let alone mine. Get back under your stone.
no the problem is that you are unintelligent and know it
To return to the topic, I think that there is a real problem with people of Emily Benn's age standing for Parliament and then becoming MPs.
There are far too many people who are elected as MPs who have never had a job outside the world of party politics, political think-tanks and lobbying. This applies to all the main parties.
People should get real-world experience that they can bring to politics before they can stand for election.
You're a nasty juvenile little shit, aren't you?
Re Post 278
I find posts with intermittent comment interspersed with multiple quotes, as unreadable as those lengthy rants without paragraph spaces that some people write. Such private disputes could surely be kept to PMs.
She's 18. There aren't any 18 year olds in Parliament. It would be good if there were. They would know more about schools and being 18 than any other MPs.?
What conditions would you add to the present ones? Would you have a mnimum age higher than 18? It was 21 until recently. Would you have a special panel to say who had "enough" life experience to qualify?.?
Charlie Kennedy was 23 when he got in, and he flew straight from Indiana University where he was studying. The only job he'd had since graduating was a stint with the BBC as a journalist. Yet the electors of Ross, Cromarty and Skye saw fit to vote him in, as to this day do the electors of Ross, Skye and Lochaber. Would you have ruled him out, so that a thirty-something accountant could have stood instead?.?
Or would you, like me, just leave it up to the electors to decide, by voting in an election?
Look, I already KNOW about the lizard people.your presuming that the electors actually have a choice but then again you probably think we are living in a democracy
You can't search 3 letter words.i think we all know who i was refering to well the mods must have at least as the thread demonstrates
actually bucthersapron has made a reference to 'ike' on this thread did you do a thread search on that ? evidently not...
Who gives a toffee what he's written on other threads? You yourself claimed he'd done so on this thread....still and fyi he has used 'conspiraloon' on others often recently...
Even your insults are scarcely worthy of being called mediocre!...other posters would be aware of this so you can stick your book where the sun dont shine oopps i forgot seeing as thats where you keep most of your ideas !
And yet...wow im honored
so whats your excuse if name calling and smears is the work of a fool then i must be in the right company here on urban as it is a habit you bucthersapron nino to name a few indulge in readily and often
Well, isn't it odd how no-one else who read that "insult" took it in the same context as you did?i was drawing attention to the fact that this occurs vp when someones sanity is questioned in relation to a topic under disscussion what do you think the purpose of it is ? it took an intervention by treelover who asked people to tone it down on a previous thread and i do not think that he was addressing his point to me as i was not the one who had started throwing insults based upon mental illness whihc leveas one culprit
Does asking whether you've taken your largactyl "question your sanity"?i disgaree with a lot of posters on a lot of issues tho i doubt i have ever questioned there sanity...
Which "c" word is that?just there judgement and when they have thrown there toys out of the pram as you and especially nino are apt at doing i flame grill you accordingly - i am admit that i do at least try to make the flaming a bit more entertaining for the neutrals rather than opting for the usual c word
Something you yourself do too.i think your confused which is the story of life 5/10 for misrepresentation - which you admit to on the other thread the one line wonder was a reference to posters who do not post on threads except for one line in which they usually do nothing but try and flame
Then why not make yourself clear first time out, rather than the gushing babble of shite you post and then have to clarify?my point about the far right has nothing to do with one line wonders - my point was the context with which those who deem themselves anti every ism under the sun adn who then exposes themselves as hypocryties - then start wondering why the far right are growing
You haven't, and I haven't claimed that you have.Perhaps o ominpotent on eyou could actually show where i have said i am pure and great ? no?
Read it again.in your book that makes you a liar!
Well and good if you also apply your rules to yourself.im not a poster trying to set the world to rights according to marx or liberalism or anarchism these grand narratives are dead and the presevre of the wealthy imo i just think that it is wrong hypcocrtical and in the long term politically and soically damaging to play at treating people equally and shout about how your being discriminate dagainst and then start to use generalisations as other posters themselves do the more they do so the more the chickens will keep coming home to roost
I haven't got a sodding clue what you're on about with Johnny Rotten, and I don't particularly care. I've also told you that I have no psychic abilities and have never claimed to be omnipotent, but have it your own way.well heres looking at you kid...
no its sarcasm and - a reference to your self appointed ominpotence and un declared physic abilities which you apparently share with others for example who know johny rotten is rasist becasue they 'just know things cos you er.. just do'
Of course I do, and of course you don't, brasic.you use smears all the time so i think you should be able to take your own medicine!
Actually, I wouldn't.wouldnt you like to know then you could be a bit more creative as opposed to using the c word
so whats your excuse
Look, I already KNOW about the lizard people.
That isn't much of a reply and it only serves to illustrate what a barren place your mind is.
You plainly do!who gives a fuck?
You plainly do!
yeah your so insightfull still if theres one expert of barren on these boards then its you