DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
fuck me I've been quoted for a gaurdian article. Should have known there would be journos all over that site.
fuck me I've been quoted for a gaurdian article. Should have known there would be journos all over that site.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-police-assault-ian-tomlinsonwhere?
It's heartening to see some folk can still retain such a touching faith in police omnipotence even now.When they've collated it all, helped by id info from facebook and the 'I was there' posts on threads like this, the raids will start, followed by charges, bail conditions and discrediting of witnesses.
£50 says no.And then maybe pre-emptive arrests in advance of Mayday or whenever.
from the article said:A contributer identifed as Timbo797 wrote: "Not moving when they are told to and instructed to by police officers, who does that?! People who have no respect for the police. I think there is already an underlying basis of no respect for police and authority in this country. I'm not talking about brutal rule, just plain law and order ... Now, I am not condoning 100% what this officer did in pushing Mr Tomlinson, however maybe he shouldn't have been there in the first place if told to move several times by advancing officers?!"
fuck if this is the type of person we;ve got acting in defence of law and security ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-police-assault-ian-tomlinson
comment I made on the uk police online forums quoted here. weird.
"Citizen journalism has pretty much exposed a consistently mismanaged police operation," said DotC. "Is it acceptable to charge a man from behind when he is walking away hands in pockets?"
Just spotted this. If other press are witnessing this kind of thing regularly, then it's maybe a very contributory factorFuck me the police are getting a right good kicking in the press again today - I can't ever remember the mainstream papers laying into the police like this before
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/apr/19/ipcc-police-g20-protests
believe me there were worse comments on that particular thread...
Need a log-in to see it.
A telling quote in that video is the Policeman's response when asked "Do you believe in a free press?"
He replies "The only thing I believe in the papers is the date"
Plus of course asking them to "Do me a favour and go away for half an hour" while quoting an erroneously applied piece of legislation
cut and paste some of what they are writing
Sub-seven
Yesterday, 04:49 PM
Post #1
Assistant Chief Constable
Group: Members
Posts: 1,725
Joined: 3-September 07
From: The naughty step...
Member No.: 17,396
How many more will come in now they are smelling the money.
Where there's blame , there's a claim.
WellAdvised
Yesterday, 04:52 PM
Post #3
Chief Inspector
Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 26-December 07
Member No.: 19,325
QUOTE (Sub-seven @ Apr 18 2009, 01:49 PM)
How many more will come in now they are smelling the money.
Where there's blame , there's a claim.
Is it just me?
--------------------
Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands
Assistant Chief Constable
Group: Members
Posts: 1,725
Joined: 3-September 07
From: The naughty step...
Member No.: 17,396
I'm just waiting on the complaint coming in from the member of the public who had his stick head-butted by that nasty Officer....
Assistant Chief Constable
Group: Resident Fed
Posts: 1,735
Joined: 2-September 04
From: sussex
Member No.: 5,424
and yet the police officer covered in blood from a head injury probably wouldnt get more than £5 for his story. probably not as exciting
Inspector
Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 3-November 06
Member No.: 12,374
Of course a shield strike is an approved tactic, in prison tactics striking with the sharp edge of the shield as hard as you can is the way to do it but this was nowhere near as bad.
Lets not forget not one innocent member of the public has been the subject of these G20 news stories. We have the abusive, aggressive, obstructive drunk. Swearing, abusive, agressive Gollum and this aggressive idiot who is unneccessarily close to Police
What I was slightly surprised by in that was that one of the reporters there didn't decide to make a bit of a point of it and refuse to go - with all the other reporters there to film it. OK, maybe they're just like us in that nobody wants to be the one sticking their head up above the parapet too far, but I'd have thought there could have been one hell of a story in an illegal arrest of a journo on film...
Or am I being somehow naive here?
I'd have thought there could have been one hell of a story in an illegal arrest of a journo on film...
This has probably been said before but none of the 185 people who complained about being 'assaulted' would have had the opportunity to do so if only they had MOVED BACK when told to do so. Call me naiive but I would not choose to bait police dogs, deliberately delay when asked to move by police in an obvious public order situation, or keep returning into the personal space of a baton-wielding cop when being told to shift out of the way.
If only the top echelons of the Met had the balls to say to the headline-hungry press bandwagon, "The police on the ground did a good job. If people moved when we told them to then none of this would have happened. (And P.S. to the MP who was on TV today questioning why police officers wore 'balaclavas' - as though to remain anonymous- IT'S STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION! Now shut up and get your own house in order!"
No, really, I think it's more some coppers are bastards (SCAB? ), but the culture within the police force is one of omerta as far as showing dissent towards the macho stuff goes, so a large proportion of the force get tarred with the same brush as the dodgy 10% who deserve it, and can't (or won't) speak out. If anything needs changing, I reckon it's that. Somehow *shrug*And yet Police Oracle is still full of arrogant, above-the-law, class-sneering comments and desparate attempts to justify their actions, together with self-pitying crap about press distortion and how unfairly they're being treated.
I wasn't ACAB before all this. I've met some who seemed alright, and so hoped it was confined to particular forces/units. But it's not, it's an all-pervading culture, and not one copper has stepped forward to condemn it. So now; ACAB.
Maybe - but it'd have been everyone else's story
Police oracle is still open to all. Lots of similar stuff on there.
http://www .policeoracle.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=11474&PN=30
That, to me, is what ACAB means. It's not a comment on the nature of individual officers so much as the institution as a whole. If ACAB were not true, officers involved on 1-3 April would have been reported by colleagues long before the video footage came out. None of them were.No, really, I think it's more some coppers are bastards (SCAB? ), but the culture within the police force is one of omerta as far as showing dissent towards the macho stuff goes, so a large proportion of the force get tarred with the same brush as the dodgy 10% who deserve it, and can't (or won't) speak out. If anything needs changing, I reckon it's that. Somehow *shrug*
That, to me, is what ACAB means. It's not a comment on the nature of individual officers so much as the institution as a whole. If ACAB were not true, officers involved on 1-3 April would have been reported by colleagues long before the video footage came out. None of them were.
ACAB.
Ron's gone, it's Denis O'Connor now.As, possibly, would yer man Flanagan in his inquiry what the Met asked him to hold, hoping to get the heat off.