Treacle Toes
Time
Not so much "Asian", as "Asian teenager", as in "not a copper in fancy dress".
Oh so 'Asian teenager' doesn't really mean the person is in anyway Asian it is code for 'not a copper'. Got it!
I'm glad thats cleared up .
Not so much "Asian", as "Asian teenager", as in "not a copper in fancy dress".
great little video:
Correct link hereThat video now up on BBC, last updated a few minutes ago.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7997990.stm
Voiceover: "The IPCC say they've had a number of complaints and they're not sure whether this is one of them"
That video now up on BBC, last updated a few minutes ago.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7997990.stm
Voiceover: "The IPCC say they've had a number of complaints and they're not sure whether this is one of them"
and maybe the next time that bird confronts a riot copper she might think whether there will be any consequences in the adrenaline fuelled moment!
and maybe the next time that bird confronts a riot copper she might think whether there will be any consequences in the adrenaline fuelled moment!
Peaceful protesters like the woman being assaulted in that video, you mean?the peaveful protesters had the right idea. everyone else gets what they deserve
In light of the G20 event Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson has invited Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Denis O'Connor, to conduct a review of related public order policing tactics.
Sir Paul said: "G20 was a complex policing operation managing the movement and protection of many heads of state across the capital while balancing the right to lawful protest and maintaining public order for many thousands of people.
"It is also the case that a number of complaints have been raised in relation to the tactic of containment and as to whether this achieves that balance. I want to be reassured that the use of this tactic remains appropriate and proportionate.
"Separately, I have already expressed my concern that the video footage of some police actions are clearly disturbing and should be thoroughly investigated. As well as the post-event investigation into those responsible for violence and disorder, I have also ensured that footage in police possession is reviewed to identify any other matters of individual police conduct that may warrant investigation.
"One matter that I also want to make clear is that uniformed police officers should be identifiable at all times by their shoulder identification numbers. The public has a right to be able to identify any uniformed officer whilst performing their duty. We must ensure this is always the case."
Interesting last two bits as well:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8000246.stm pressure rising
You mean the "peeps" that the police laid into with batons and arrested at random?The peeps at the sit down had the peaceful thing down to a tee!
So shouting is a form of violence now? Should the police have arrested her for assault with an offensive word?She...well she didnt look imbued with peace
Slow down Gandhi, you're killing them.The peeps at the sit down had the peaceful thing down to a tee! She...well she didnt look imbued with peace
You mean the "peeps" that the police laid into with batons and arrested at random?
So shouting is a form of violence now? Should the police have arrested her for assault with an offensive word?
Are you still beating your wife?she was all up in the officers face for want of a better expression. im glad he gave her a smack with his pimp glove and riot attire.
Yes, it is.its all so easy for you to watch his actions on youtube and say its wrong.
I'm sure your disapproval would be a great comfort to the people who were beaten with sticks by the police.yawn. is this how your arguments go? Earlier in the thread I have said that the charges on the peaceful dudes was wrong. thanks for bringing that up though.
So basically, you're a twat who isn't worth enaging with. Thanks for clearing that up.she was all up in the officers face for want of a better expression. im glad he gave her a smack with his pimp glove and riot attire.
You, my good man, are an ignorant moron.she was all up in the officers face for want of a better expression. im glad he gave her a smack with his pimp glove and riot attire.
Thanks for clearing that up.
yawn. is this how your arguments go? Earlier in the thread I have said that the charges on the peaceful dudes was wrong. thanks for bringing that up though.
she was all up in the officers face for want of a better expression. im glad he gave her a smack with his pimp glove and riot attire.
its all so easy for you to watch his actions on youtube and say its wrong.
should he have put her on the naughty step until she calmed down?