Athos
Well-Known Member
Why moot? They're fueling the circus.Strange place to pick holes, but afaict the two named people involved in this are a journalists and a Welsh football official, so the idea of them boycotting might be moot.
Why moot? They're fueling the circus.Strange place to pick holes, but afaict the two named people involved in this are a journalists and a Welsh football official, so the idea of them boycotting might be moot.
Wear a pink shirt and see what happensWear a plainer one over the top then remove it once inside the ground.
Plus driving would be a lot slower. Not sure even Hamilton could keep up with a jet.Only a small matter of the Atlantic ocean to navigate
Because not everyone wants to give up their job to make a political point.Why moot? They're fueling the circus.
that's what i'd do with my beer...Wear a plainer one over the top then remove it once inside the ground.
I'm unconvinced.Because not everyone wants to give up their job to make a political point.
Because sometimes it might be good to have journalists in bad places covering events.
Because some people might prefer to make a small protest in person than not go and have nobody protesting there at all.
So what proactive things are you doing to protest against the World Cup taking place in Qatar?I'm unconvinced.
Are basic human rights just "a political point"?
Do you think having journalists there is a net benefit in this instance?
Not going would be the protest. And arguably a more powerful one than wearing a rainbow hat whilst taking part in the sportswashing spectacle.
I'm not going.So what proactive things are you doing to protest against the World Cup taking place in Qatar?
But you never were going to go, were you?I'm not going.
And I'm discouraging others from doing so.
I've also written to my club, the FA, and FIFA, as well as my MP, government ministers, and a number of newspapers.
I had hoped to attend the demonstration outside the Qatar Embsay, but currently have covid.
You?
ETA: I'd forgotten, but I've also done some campaigning in my workplace/union to highlight the issue.
I was never going to go to Qatar (or Russia). But I might well have gone had it been somewhere else.But you never were going to go, were you?
And what effective means have you employed to actively discourage anyone who wanted to go?
There needn't be fans there. They've chosen to go.The issue is the treatment of the people who are there, rather than their behaviour in going. There were, realistically, never going to be no people there.
OK. Let's assume they're total cunts for a moment. Is it all fine?There needn't be fans there. They've chosen to go.
Well, it's not me getting on my high horse criticising the actions of journalists and supporters, but apart from providing a forum where people can freely express their criticism of Qatar, FIFA and, indeed, working journalists who are covering the event, I've also decided not to promote it in any way on Brixton Buzz (we've traditionally given a lot of coverage to the WC*).I was never going to go to Qatar (or Russia). But I might well have gone had it been somewhere else.
I've campaigned to persuade others not to go, by drawing attention to the issues in a number of ways, including speaking to fellow fans (directly and indirectly).
You?
That they're prevented from wearing rainbow hats? No, of course not.OK. Let's assume they're total cunts for a moment. Is it all fine?
Are journalists and supporters beyond criticism, then?Well, it's not me getting on my high horse criticising the actions of journalists and supporters, but apart from providing a forum where people can freely express their criticism of Qatar, FIFA and, indeed, working journalists who are covering the event, I've also decided not to promote it in any way on Brixton Buzz (we've traditionally given a lot of coverage to the WC).
I'm not so arrogant to assume that I've had any influence on stopping people who were going to go anyway, though.
OK. So to what extent would you say the fact that they might be cunts is the headline issue?That they're prevented from wearing rainbow hats? No, of course not.
Practically, tens of thousands of fans were always going to travel to the tournament, so how the fuck are we going to know what happens to them if there's no journalists there to report on what they see?Are journalists and supporters beyond criticism, then?
I haven't called then cunts. I've questioned whether, if they really care about human rights, they'd have been better boycotting the event, rather than wearing rainbow hats. That is a headline issue.OK. So to what extent would you say the fact that they might be cunts is the headline issue?
That thousands of people were "always going to" do something shitty doesn't make it any less shitty.Practically, tens of thousands of fans were always going to travel to the tournament, so how the fuck are we going to know what happens to them if there's no journalists there to report on what they see?
For the record, it was editor who raised the issue of rainbow hats on this thread.Is every game thread going to turn into a similar argument? Does anyone think everybody doesn't know about how shitty the situation is but it's maybe a TINY bit more nuanced than if you're part of the problem then you 100% cannot be part of the solution?
Argue like fuck in the 'Drawing the line' thread but like it or not the football is happening and I'd rather like to watch it without being berated.
I like this Ryan fella
Sure. But they're not the Wales team. About to take on the USA.Promo for his TV show about Wrexham.
And it's you that's fucking gone on and n and on about it, hypocritically moralising away and condemning supporters while doing absolutely fuck all to change anything yourself.For the record, it was editor who raised the issue of rainbow hats on this thread.
And nobody is berating you. Not least of all because watching it on TV is a bit different from going there; like you say, there's nuance.
I've not gone on about it, other than in response to you and others.And it's you that's fucking gone on and n and on about it, hypocritically moralising away and condemning supporters while doing absolutely fuck all to change anything yourself.
Enough already.
Immovable grumpy object is hit by unstoppable grumpy force. Net result, two grumpy people feel more cross.I've not gone on about it, other than in response to you and others.
There's no hypocrisy in my position.
And I've told you what I've done to try to change it.
As for "moralising", I don't think taking a moral stand is a bad thing