Thats the last way I would go about when trying to find out which films are any good. You’ll always find random people who think some trash is a masterpiece if you go by IMDb. Even the overall score of 6.7 far from indicates rave reviews.
No, it’s just a tool which can be used well or poorly.
Netflix in-house produced movies are generally the opposite. It’s where quality film makers like the Coen Brothers, Alfonso Cuaron and Noah Baumbach now get their funding, because Hollywood won’t make those type of dramas anymore.
Fury is probably the last half decent war film made.
I take no notice of critics reviews. I find most of them are stuck so far up their own arseholes that it makes them pointless. I often found that I enjoyed films they panned and hated what they raved about.
"Let's all run up to the front of the tank and shoot at it with rifles"
The tracer and tank rounds flying around in Fury are scary as fook
I've often found the same with "completely random person on the internet".
That is Attackers.
Truly spoken like someone who doesn’t know a thing about film criticism. That’s why you are stuck watching crappy mainstream films like Midway, thinking they are going to be any good. You are going by confirmation bias.
Only in the case of Midway, tbf. Works fine most other times.
There's tons of it too!Hahaha, just looked at a video, so it is
1917 is excellent..
I thought 1917 was ok rather than excellent but I gave Land of Mine its own thread.
Mention away! But remember that this thread simply collates together ‘votes’ for films recorded in various recommendation threads, as aggregated by the 2010 ‘Log of war film threads’ thread, so is obviously skewed towards earlier movies.
