gamma globulins
plinky plonky
That's simply how I've heard it described, from more than one source. Perhaps there is a recording bias with regards to which families survived and which were eliminated outright.
I've heard it described that Hitler wasn't all that bad, all things considered. Thing is, they're usually anti-Jews, anti-Roma & -Sinti, anti-whatever, & on the positive side, fascists, murdering nationalists, & supporters of genocide.That's simply how I've heard it described . . .
There's also a perception that "Jews" were involved in causing the Ukrainian famine based on the fact that some of the people in Stalin's government of the time administering Ukraine were apparently Jewish.
I defriended an Ukrainian student I had on facebook, after she posted the following: "why are these Jews always complaining, when we Ukrainians had it worse".
it's the new ratings war: MY genocide was worse than YOURS.. . . "why are these Jews always complaining, when we Ukrainians had it worse".
It's one reason why it is wrong to call the fascist European judeocide THE Holocaust: it was one genocide, not even the largest in human history, & even if it were it would be anti-humanist to ascribe an upper case 'h'. Such labelling has been used, as we all know, to defend Jewish Israeli supremacism throughout the whole of Mandated Palestine. And it has contributed to that lachrimal politics used to try to defend the indefensible. As the title of Avraham Burg's book has it, 'The Holocaust Is Over'.
Socialists & the few Marxists in the German Federal Republic vacated the political field concerning the 14 million so-called ethnic Germans driven & deported from their homes to the east, & German nationalists & fascists were their only advocates. What happened to them was a crime that 'the left' chose to ignore.The holdomor is a keystone of the ukranian far-right - you'll find normal people involved with others using it for their own ends. I was surprised to find a canadian mate was friendly with some dodgy people through a local memorial group they had over there.
'Genocide' as a legal term, & as its coiner Lemkin advocated, doesn't require "deliberate intention to wipe out . . . a people". As the below shows, genocide, as considered by law, doesn't require mass slaughter: intent is enough - indeed, intending mass murder isn't necessary. And it can concern just a part of a human group, not all of it. And it need not involve the intent to kill anyone: suffice is intending to cause serious mental harm, or intending to introduce mass sterilisation, or intending to take away the children from a human group.The Ukraine famine may have been genocidal in its effects, but I don't think historians regard it as motivated by a deliberate intention to wipe out Ukrainians as a people. . .
Ukraine's pre-1941 history has been invoked by others, the genocide by famine, so I just made a concise general statement about how genocides have been used by putative representatives of the murdered. Context allows text to be more meaningful, yes?what's this got to do with anything?
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Very disturbing footage has emerged purporting to show the security service building in central Ukrainian city of Khmelnytskyi being riddled with machine gun fire during a protest.
The shots came while the main doors to the building were being smashed by protesters.
The footage shows the bleeding body of a woman who was shot in the incident. Protesters are then shown pushing trolley buses in front of the building as a barricade.
The footage [warning: upsetting content] , cannot be independently verified.
Don't say qua. Cheers.A quick google suggests that Stalin indeed hated the Ukrainians qua Ukrainians and wanted to teach them "a lesson". So his criminal responsibility goes beyond incompetence and indifference into deliberate and malign evil.
But I'd still say that wanting to teach a population "a lesson" is not the same thing as wanting to wipe them out in their entirety.
Don't say qua. Cheers.
The Punctuation Police (Kyiv Branch, currently homeless as our building was torched by bandera-wearing terrorists) issue you with a summons for leaving off the '.' of 'et al.': it's 'et alia'.et al