butchersapron
Bring back hanging
I'm right that you need to fuck off. For the good of everyone concerned.Aww, so caring. You're always right, aren't you?
I'm right that you need to fuck off. For the good of everyone concerned.Aww, so caring. You're always right, aren't you?
Take different drugs and give us a rest you spindle armed loonWell, maybe I'm a bit muddled but he seems to want them to be given the oxygen of publicity. My bad if I've got it wrong.
Take different drugs and give us a rest you spindle armed loon
That post didn't even mention "giving them the benefit of the doubt" whatever that means. BA simply pointed out that the possibility of UKIP taking the highest share the euro elections is a new story, and that only cowardly fools like taffboy want the news to hide this fact.Nah, sorry. Anyone who gives that party the benefit of the doubt deserves pointing out.
I'm a little mole from Hungary or somewhereWho are you again? Anyone important or just fancied sloppy seconds?
I, at least, would want to report on UKIP. Your want to ostrich it and think that your viewers and readers deserve nothing less. Than not talking about that thing that's happening.
I don't have to - your whole thing is that they shouldn't be because they're fanning flames that bareley exist. The place is burning down around you.Seeing as you're so big on evidence and digging things out, how about a game of "find the post where I said UKIP shouldnt be reported on".
It's a question of proportion, as is the case in a lot of journalistic issues. it's not outlandish to say that the ceaseless attention in the press is out of proportion.
I'm a little mole from Hungary or somewhere
Go away. You need a rest.Czech Republic, you racist cunt. I suppose all those countries are the same to you.
krtek a houby I may not always understand what Butchers is going on about, but nowhere have I seen him giving UKIP 'the benefit of the doubt'
Go away. You need a rest.
Have a go at the victim. And stay classy. How did you get to be the person to say who belongs here and who doesn't? Is there some kind of course or certificate?
What? What victim? WTF are you on about? What have you chose the two above quotes to demonstrate?
Have a go at the victim. And stay classy. How did you get to be the person to say who belongs here and who doesn't? Is there some kind of course or certificate?
You tragic little man.Playing the innocent, are we? "WTF are you on about"/"go away"... your schtick is lamentable.
So, off you go. Broiling in your own frustration until your next outburst."Go away"
taffboy gwyrdd why have you quoted me here?
fuck off cuntUgly stuff on here, what happened to robust but fair debate?
Czech Republic, you racist cunt. I suppose all those countries are the same to you.
I assume that everyone would agree that UKIP are a right wing nationalist party?
So does it follow that everyone who votes for them is either misinformed or a racist?
Resentment here is about something more profound than fear of jobs being taken by outsiders or distaste at the sound of alien consonants in the bus queue. It expresses a feeling that all the important decisions are being made elsewhere; that someone in the capital has decided what kind of town this should be and that dissent is ignored or, worse, belittled as the mark of backward provinciality.
“People feel they’ve lost something.........They may not be able to pinpoint what it is, but they don’t think they’re getting it back.”
"....it (UKIP) feeds on and fuels pessimism, especially among her older constituents. They have worked hard throughout their lives and find as they reach retirement that they are worse off than they expected to be. They cannot go on holiday or provide treats for their grandchildren. They struggle to heat their homes in winter. These indignities provoke shame and rage. Financial precariousness that was exposed by the Great Recession combines with longer-standing feelings of cultural disorientation to produce a dread of abandonment. Politics in Westminster is judged to be for the benefit of someone else – migrants, welfare recipients, bankers, Brussels bureaucrats.
This is how Farage has been able to position himself as the anti-politician threatening to storm the wicked bastion.
In the case of my parents I would also add in the raw emotion of betrayal; they have, for the most part, voted deferentially as rural, working class tories...and have (finally) seemed to realise that it has got them nowhere...their level of vitriol for Cameron has been consistent since he gained the leadership of the party.
Like you – or three-quarters of you – I wouldn't choose the European Union as one of the key issues facing the country, even though I agree the British people should be given a vote on our membership. You think Westminster has become the preserve of career politicians, which is why I agree Parliament desperately need more working-class MPs, rooted in their communities, who understand the everyday concerns of voters.
But our agreement goes so much further than that. A generation ago, our energy suppliers were flogged off to profiteers, some foreign, some British, but all rich and making money out of hard-pressed consumers. No wonder nearly 8 out of 10 of you want energy brought into public ownership – a figure even higher than other voters. You're right: it's time we stop the Big Six holding us to ransom, leaving millions lying awake at night wondering how they can pay the bills, and elderly people shivering in their homes.
It's the same story with our railways, too. You're justifiably angry that the taxpayer is forking out three times more subsidies to our rip-off, inefficient railways, filling the bank accounts of the rail barons while millions are priced out of travelling. So nearly three-quarters of you are right to back bringing rail back into public ownership – again, a higher number than other British voters.
This Government is handing our NHS, one of our country's most valued institutions, to tax-avoiding private health companies who are driven by profit, not the needs of patients. I'm not letting the last Labour government off the hook, before you ask, with their Private Finance Initiative which has left so many of our hospitals saddled with debts. So, like 84 per cent of you, I believe the NHS should be “nationalised and run in the public sector”.
We're spending billions of taxpayers' money subsidising poverty wage-paying bosses, and most people living in poverty in Britain in 2014 have to get up each morning to work. So when two-thirds of you back “a substantial increase” in the minimum wage, I'm with you all the way: it would save money, boost demand in the economy, make work pay, and help stop bosses undercutting wages with cheaper labour, wherever it comes from.
There are studies of the attitudes of people who call themselves anti-government. You know, “Get the government off my back,” the Tea Party. It turns out they’re pretty much social democrats. They want increased spending on health, on education, on aid for families with dependent children, but of course not “welfare,” because “welfare” was demonized by Reagan’s racism.
They say, “Don’t get involved with the world, but do it sometimes.” It’s a very strange collection.
You remember this guy who stood up at a town hall meeting somewhere and said something like, “Don’t fiddle with my Medicare.” Though the government people laughed, it’s not a joke.
If you look at studies of opinion, it turns out that, by and large, the more people get from the government, the less they think they get, and the more they’re opposed to government. It’s pretty steady. There are some deeply conservative, rural counties in California, which are radically libertarian, which are practically funded by the government.
Those people just don’t seem to understand what’s happening in the world. And, in fact, this anti-government feeling itself is pretty interesting. It’s a kind of pathology in the United States, which reflects a lack of functioning democracy.
Take, say, taxes. Everybody’s against taxes. In a functioning democracy you’d be in favor of them. April 15th would be a day of celebration. You’re getting together to fund the programs that you decided on.
Here it’s a day of mourning. Some alien entity is pouncing on us to take away our hard-earned money, meaning we don’t have a democracy that way.
Ron Paul plays a very strange roll. Whatever his personal goals are, or whatever his understanding is, I have no idea. But if you look at his policies, first of all, they’re pretty vicious. And also, I think they lead to a kind of corporate tyranny. He might not want that or think it, but I think that’s what it means.
The anti-redistributive policies say everybody’s on their own. If you’re a disabled widow across town and your husband didn’t happen to make enough money, you starve.
This pattern is broadly replicated. "The government should have the power to control energy prices": 83% Ukip, 86% Lab, 60% Con; "The government should have the power to control private sector rents": 50% Ukip, 56% Lab, 32% Con; "The energy companies should be run in the public sector": 73% Ukip, 79% Labour, 52% Con. YouGov warns that people "should be careful about reading too much into a sub-sample", but notwithstanding that caveat they can be "confident in saying that Ukip voters do seem to be more supportive of price controls and nationalisation than their rightwing image might suggest".
I think we all know who the real racist is don't we?
As is evident by your post earlier, yes, yes we do.
Where? From who?Ugly stuff on here, what happened to robust but fair debate?