scifisam
feck! arse! girls! drink!
So, this inhuman hideous thing wants to get its claws on the children...
It's definitely had plastic surgery, too.
So, this inhuman hideous thing wants to get its claws on the children...
It's definitely had plastic surgery, too.
dunno, couldn't see for all the Bubbles in the tank
But wouldn't have made much sense. The BNP aren't in power.I forgot about the failed asylum seekers (which might also be a decent name for a New Seekers tribute band) "They won't be missed".
It's amusing to have Cabinet politicians talking candidly as you know they must think.
Taking the asylum seeker angle further, it might have been interesting to have gone for the racist angle given the BNP's recent success rather than school league tables; perhaps excluding children with indiginous parentage. That would have generated some reflection.
If we were to talk seriously about the preposterous for a minute; if a politician - obviously looking for the minimal political damage to themselves - had the choice between children at the bottom 10% of failing schools (regardless of the childs ability) or . . . children of a non-indigenous background, which of those would the politician think would be the most expedient, the most acceptable to the general population of the UK as it is today?But wouldn't have made much sense. The BNP aren't in power.
If we were to talk seriously about the preposterous for a minute; if a politician - obviously looking for the minimal political damage to themselves - had the choice between children at the bottom 10% of failing schools (regardless of the childs ability) or . . . children of a non-indigenous background, which of those would the politician think would be the most expedient, the most acceptable to the general population of the UK as it is today?
Reference the ‘middle brow’ tabloids and some red top tabloids. That would have been an interesting Cabinet discussion. Too brave for the BBC, I suspect.
As it is, morally speaking the whole 10% theme is already about a five minute bus ride from Auschwitz.
Right, as compared with focusing on failed schools, filled as they are (from this political pov) with non-fee paying working class kids, likely to be at some stage of social disenfranchisement, social alienation, steeped in stereotyped estate culture and who – in terms of their importance to society – are seemingly one step up the ladder from failed asylum seekers in terms of expendability.I'm bloody glad they didn't focus on race. It would have been clunky, laboured and daft. As it is it's sharp, uncomfortable viewing.
What?Right, as compared with focusing on failed schools, filled as they are with non-fee paying working class kids, likely to be at some stage of social disenfranchisement, social alienation, steeped in stereotyped estate culture and who – in terms of their importance to society – are seemingly one step up the ladder from failed asylum seekers.
I mean, I was annoyed when they killed off Donna and haven't watched Who since, but at least I was able to acknowledge that her death wasn't the only event in that episode.
you get much more development and depth in a multi-parter. Makes the previous two series' look like absolute crap
The episode made me cry because of the prospect of millions of children dying - for then, it was only Ianto's death that made them cry.
Makes the previous two series' look like absolute crap
Anyone else notice that it was Nicholas Briggs who plays the voice of the Daleks etc. Nice to see him on screen for a change.With the Prime Minister called Green (I mean, can we think of another Prime Minister with a surname that's a colour, hmmm? ), I think it's fairly obvious, and that odious spinner had the Mandelson sliminess totally down-pat.
HAHAHAHAAAHAHHAHAA!!and have accused RTD of being homophobic.
InnitThey killed .. Ianto.
bet there were teachers up and down the land going 10% you need the list by tomorrow
Oh yes please!Totally agree with this. A couple of these 5-parters every year would be just the ticket.
The previous two series *were* absolute crap. Well, not far off.
andy2002 - do you have access to all the overnight ratings, just interested in one other that's not on the BARB free stats?
What's most impressive is its highest audience was last night - they almost always drop after the week-long promo build up regardless. The slot helps, of course.
I suppose the BBC knew it was a winner, at least as best you can know.
andy2002 - do you have access to all the overnight ratings, just interested in one other that's not on the BARB free stats?
I like Who but think Torchwood is a pile of shite. Should I have bothered with this?