scifisam
feck! arse! girls! drink!
It is amazing, but if you think about it, it’s even more amazing that the result of an exam taken 30 years ago in a subject promptly forgotten about is even considered relevant in the first place. Is there a minimum standard needed in maths (for example)? If so, everyone should actually need to demonstrate current competence to this standard in advance of doing the course. Or is there no such standard needed in reality? in which case, what is the exam result from 30 years ago meant to prove?
(My concern is that the answer to that question comes from an institutional desire to classify people into the “capable“ and the “incapable“, and that they view an exam pass 30 years previously as evidence of belonging to the “capable” category. Which is not at all a helpful way of viewing human beings.)
Until last year there were functional skills tests in literacy and numeracy (a few years ago there was one in IT too), but now universities are supposed to assess that themselves.