MightyTibberton
Well-Known Member
Your contention is that UKIP is the party that most respects the working class of the UK and best represents their interests?
Would that be an astroturf field?
Would that be an astroturf field?
Quilliam are a highly reputable anti extremist organisation that I certainly would trust. Quilliam are part of the solution, extremism is harmful but facts must be faced. Articles trying to explain it all away and say there isn’t a specific problem isn’t likely to help in my opinion. But I don’t believe the left are capable of facing reality so the Robinson/UKIP lot will only continue to grow, I think.
Quilliam are a highly reputable anti extremist organisation that I certainly would trust. Quilliam are part of the solution, extremism is harmful but facts must be faced. Articles trying to explain it all away and say there isn’t a specific problem isn’t likely to help in my opinion. But I don’t believe the left are capable of facing reality so the Robinson/UKIP lot will only continue to grow, I think.
Your contention is that UKIP is the party that most respects the working class of the UK and best represents their interests?
Would that be an astroturf field?
Except they're not are they because they published a report that was FULL OF LIES. If you trust them in this matter then you are fooling yourself and anyone else you make that case too.
I mean this in the nicest possible way but I think that you just want that to be true and whatever the facts were you would find a way of rationalising that this were so. Majid Nawaz has done more than most to make this country a better place, he’s certainly not a bigot out to blame his own community unfairly. He’s a decent British liberal who always tries to live up to his own principles.
What opinions does Stephen Christopher Yaxley Lennon hold that would represent you?
Well I’m as working class as they come I guess. But I don’t dislike middle or upper class people for simply being who they are. I despise the institutional discrimination there is against the working class though, if Tommy Robinson sounded more like Douglas Murray the media would not have treated him the way they have. From my point of view Tommy Robinson has done two things I approve of and quite a bit wrong. In 2011(ish) he went on a BBC interview with Jeremy Paxman and revealed that grooming gangs were abusing kids and councillors and police officers were conspiring to keep it a secret. I commend him for revealing that at a time when it was still being covered up. I also appreciate him highlighting the double standards with free speech and the lack of free speech. I want politicans to fix these issues, prosecute those who conspired to hide the grooming gangs, and create something like the USAs first amendment here. MPs have to do this, not mobs on the streets, so I never attend demonstrations.
And I meant it in the nicest possible way.
...he’s a decent British liberal...
Because he’s either naive or a gambler/chancer who isn’t afraid to sail close to the wind I suppose. I doubt he was some evil four d chess player who planned to cause a mistrial and generate public outrage as part of a master plan. I’d guess that he thought if he asked the coppers if it was ok to film there and they said yes and if he didn’t say anything that hadn’t already appeared in the press he was safe. He was wrong. I think he also thought because some of them were turning up for sentencing that day he couldn’t cause a mistrial, he was wrong about that too and I think only some verdicts were reached by that point.Why did he try and fuck up the trials, then, would you say? I'm not entirely sure who was benefiting from that. And I'm not sure at all that he's the answer to all the problems and discrimination that the w/c class face. In fact, I'm sure that many, many w/c class see right through his act.
That be fighting talk round these parts.
Because he’s either naive or a gambler/chancer who isn’t afraid to sail close to the wind I suppose. I doubt he was some evil four d chess player who planned to cause a mistrial and generate public outrage as part of a master plan.
...but someone having different opinions to me doesn’t mean they are not a decent person, only totalitarian bigots think like that
You've worked hard at this, I'll give you that...Because he’s either naive or a gambler/chancer who isn’t afraid to sail close to the wind I suppose. I doubt he was some evil four d chess player who planned to cause a mistrial and generate public outrage as part of a master plan. I’d guess that he thought if he asked the coppers if it was ok to film there and they said yes and if he didn’t say anything that hadn’t already appeared in the press he was safe. He was wrong. I think he also thought because some of them were turning up for sentencing that day he couldn’t cause a mistrial, he was wrong about that too and I think only some verdicts were reached by that point.