so they say.Was Cyril Badco before?
so they say.Was Cyril Badco before?
Are they right?so they say.
Yes you are. You're explicitly defending his actions as fine vs everyone else who is saying that they were shit.im not defending him
well IF it is true, I wouldn't be the first person on this forum to admit to having previously held some questionable views. People change/grow up/educate themselves etc.Are they right?
Yes, and topher25, cdg, philkill, christophucker etc.Was Cyril Badco before?
People change/grow up/educate themselves etc.
You’re not admitting it though? Which would be part of growing up.well IF it is true, I wouldn't be the first person on this forum to admit to having previously held some questionable views. People change/grow up/educate themselves etc.
It would also get me banned from a forum that I enjoy reading and learn a lot from, IF it was me.You’re not admitting it though? Which would be part of growing up.
for what exactly?shall I just ban you now, I can't be arsed refreshing the thread over the weekend
How do you know I am or am notfor being a returner
or do we have to do the whole thing
You'll still be able to read a lot of the boards. You just won't be able to post achingly-edgy controversialist shite any more.It would also get me banned from a forum that I enjoy reading and learn a lot from, IF it was me.
They didn't say they didn't like it tbf.Well if you want to support racist fuckwits for years
and are inable to show personal growth
what would you like andy?
He's got a lot of form for a lot worse, on and off the boards, going back well over a decade. If he isn't irredeemable, he's taking his sweet time over it.I also contend CS is indeed something of a twat, i just feel he is not really horrible or irredeemable.
I am in agreement with you .You're a twat.
And, I doubt that is just my opinion.
O. Not normally keen to chip in with controversial opinions, but, I did feel a permanent ban was a bit harsh. While being in complete agreement that Cyril 's cartoon version of the press (and, tbf, not a hill I would die defending myself), I just think this is one of those Urban scenarios where it's easy and obvious to stake out a position and single out an uncomfortable participant. I really, really don't want to get into a massive bunfight here (I have a raging toothache) but, yah know, I kinda think a willingness to engage a bit more before doing the ban thing. Just makes me feel that Urban is not as tolerant of difference as I imagined.
Also, I do believe the CS had indeed been through some personal changes of opinion, even ithough obscured by a chippy, belligerence. Like a lot of my neighbours. I sort of feel this should be nurtured a wee bit.
And I also think this endless refusal to forgive past indiscretion or bad acts is one of the very worst things about Urban.
Apols, I hinestly feel a bit bad about this...even though I also contend CS is indeed something of a twat, i just feel he is not really horrible or irredeemable.
Yes, I know. I realise that and feel the coupling of SYL (a cunt of the very worst sort, obvs) and a simplistic and stereotyped view of the Fourth Estate is a bit unfortunate. I mostly just got the disdain for the media as an institution but I didn't see any defending Yaxley Lennon. I am not sure that this is also much, much worse because LD is both a woman (although I admit to hateful, hateful thoughts towards Laura Kuensberg). I honestly have nothing in defence of CS, just more of a kind of, I dunno, alarm at the speed and severity of a permaban.
Christ, losing any threads of coherence here and wishing I hadn't chirped up. Having difficulty stating exactly what surprised and, I suppose, vexed me somewhat.