The excitement of being in a place where I can set up an office, rather than working in the corner of the bedroom.
Was watching some research discussions today about this kind of thing (part of my job!) - an organisation who poll lots of people about workplace experience were saying that basically, almost everyone rates home better for work than the office, although the very best performing offices (and they literally cover 100ks) do outdo the average home experience. But essentially, offices are going to have to do a lot to be better than homeworking.
Ooh no, I didnt mean it like that. So where are you working?Good point, I’ll shut my noise
One thing that came out today was, unsurprisingly, there is a significantly higher degree of satisfaction with WFH for those who could work in a room where they could shut the door to anyone else.The excitement of being in a place where I can set up an office, rather than working in the corner of the bedroom.
Certainly some big companies are doing that. Goldman Sachs: Bank boss rejects work from home as the 'new normal'Despite that thousands of managers will demand staff come back to the office
Oh, the difference it made for me personally was incredible. This time last year I had a whole office set up. Then when my work day was over, I'd do my paperwork and prep for the next day, then close the door and go to another room. Massive psychological difference akin to leaving the workplace.One thing that came out today was, unsurprisingly, there is a significantly higher degree of satisfaction with WFH for those who could work in a room where they could shut the door to anyone else.
Ooh no, I didnt mean it like that. So where are you working?
I have that advantage at the moment. I can close the door on the boxroom/my office and forget it.Oh, the difference it made for me personally was incredible. This time last year I had a whole office set up. Then when my work day was over, I'd do my paperwork and prep for the next day, then close the door and go to another room. Massive psychological difference akin to leaving the workplace.
I figure a dynamic will emerge where organisations that don't offer alot more flexible working will find it difficult to recruit and retain over time, so flexible and home working will become more common.. Who is going to want to work somewhere where you have to be in 9am every day...etc
and each to their own and that is exactly what (some/many) employers are offering. At my place it is very much "if you want to come in every day, do, but if not, wfh and pop in when you need to"People like me who need some semblance of structure
That's great in theory until the powers that be realise that means having an office that they're paying for half full half the time.
and each to their own and that is exactly what (some/many) employers are offering. At my place it is very much "if you want to come in every day, do, but if not, wfh and pop in when you need to"
Well that's exactly what's being discussed in my field right now - by different surveys, businessed are expected to drop their floorspace by 15-40% (depending who you ask) and people are wondering what the alternatives are. There's some talk of 'grey space', people subletting their office space to others, and various consultancies already arrange this for occupiers as middlemen, but are really touting it now. Some have suggested a 'hub and spoke' model of a central office a smaller hub ones in suburbs/commuter areas but it's looking increasingly likely that's not going to fly - people aren't likely to have an even spread of workers from different areas, it could end up race/class stratified and is not likely to be add up economically. Perhaps more common might be employers having membership or voucher schemes for local 'third spaces', for people who want to/need to get out of the house, but HQ is some way away.That's great in theory until the powers that be realise that means having an office that they're paying for half full half the time.
It looks like my employer (large distance-learning Uni) will be adopting a flexible approach when we're finally allowed back in the office.
I'd like to go in a couple of days a week and most of my colleagues seem to be thinking on similar lines, so inevitably that'll lead to a scaling down of office space, there is talk of having bookable spaces.
I heard the other day that between March-Sept last year they saved £2k + on toilet roll alone
Don't they scan stuff in when it arrives?Delivering and collecting big volumes of customer-confidential paperwork to and from employees' homes, has all sorts of possible nightmares. Not least logistically.
That's a hell of a lot on bog roll - are your colleagues spending all their time shitting while on the clock? Spending something around £400k a year on it seems pretty high.Oops, I typed that wrong, it's actually £200K + on toilet roll!
There are solutions out there. I'm not sure how "joined-up" they are though. I deal with a lot of private and confidential data. My main software provider is heavily pushing an online portal solution as a secure interface between me and my clients. Both the clients and I can upload digital documents to it securely and communicate through it. It comes at a cost though.I don’t see how that kind of model can work for industries such as mine which have a lot of private and confidential data to deal with. But I’m not very forward-looking
That's a hell of a lot on bog roll - are your colleagues spending all their time shitting while on the clock? Spending something around £400k a year on it seems pretty high.
They could save money by buying that awful shiny toilet roll we used to get at school. Deter people from using the facilities at work.It does seem a lot of money, but there are a few thousand employees
It's very much resolvable. My company has vast call centres and deals with huge amounts of personal data daily but still managed to shift it's entire operations to WFH pretty much overnight last year, with no breaches. I don't actually know how they managed to resolve the call centre problems (e.g. the call centres themselves are highly secured against people doing things like duplicating credit card numbers, including things like not allowing staff to have their own phones in the call room, for example), but it's somehow been done. The data issues are way simpler, though -- every single staff member has a virtual desktop that we access via a thin client, which means no data exists on any hard drives except for the central servers and all virtual desktops only use the predetermined secure installed set ups appropriate for that user. WFH is no less secure than working in the office, because it's the identical system either way. It's a two-key encryption to be able to access the virtual desktop too. My company has to deal with literally hundreds of thousands of half-decent cyber attacks per day, so it long since abandoned the idea of relying on the security of each individual user hardware set-up.I don’t see how that kind of model can work for industries such as mine which have a lot of private and confidential data to deal with. But I’m not very forward-looking
William of Walworth said:Delivering and collecting big volumes of customer-confidential paperwork to and from employees' homes, has all sorts of possible nightmares. Not least logistically.
Don't they scan stuff in when it arrives?
In a survey by job listings site Flexjobs, an astonishing 65 percent of pandemic remote workers said they wanted to keep working from home and 58 percent even said they would look for a new job if they would have to return to the office. Only 2 percent said they would prefer to return, while 11 percent said that remote work was not essential for them. At a third of respondents naming it as their preferred mode of working, the hybrid model that combines office and remote work was also popular.