cheers for that, I was beginning to think my understanding was completely skewed.Globalisation is absolutely at the heart of neoliberalism
Do those protestors get a whopping great salary for doing fuck all and have access to media whenever they want it.
according to this they have?hmm, there is also the fact that none of Modi, Xi Jinping or Netanyahu addressed parliament, in the Palace of Westminster. It's that that Bercow is objecting to, not a state visit per se
cheers for that, I was beginning to think my understanding was completely skewed.
As it is, the list of companies taking on the president in defence of globalisation is quite interesting. Very few actually make anything real- Apple, Levis, a few more, but the main military industrial complex, including oil, cars, mining, engineering, aerospace, that's all missing, so is pharma, agribusiness, retail, utilities and so is finance capital, banks and the like. And Hollywood & the TV industry. Whether that's just a reflection of who gathered the group together or is actually how the battles will shape up remains to be seen.
tourists.Saw a comment like this online today: The Trump regime wants to create jobs that pay $30 a hour to make things which people currently make for $1 an hour. That's not optimism it's delusional.
Trump talks about manufacturing a lot, and about buying American, and half his economic action plan (during the election) was about slapping China down. But who will buy plastic buckets made in the USA ?
the queen will be lucky if that's all that happens.Trump doesn't want to address parliament anyway, he just wants a selfie with brenda.
As mentioned, I'm struggling to gather even 2 cheers for Bercow on this. Same time, it is quite unexpected that he phrased the whole thing so personally (at least in terms of politician speak). He has effectively accused Trump of personal racism and sexism:hmm, there is also the fact that none of Modi, Xi Jinping or Netanyahu addressed parliament, in the Palace of Westminster. It's that that Bercow is objecting to, not a state visit per se
"However, as far as this place is concerned, I feel very strongly that our opposition to racism and sexism and our support for equality before the law and an independent judiciary are hugely important considerations in the House of Commons."
Well one shift is he's no deficit hawk as he sees leverage at very low rates as good thing. Basically tribute from bankers in terror of a huge client defaulting. In any case Republicans tend to lose focus on the debt in office and spend like drunken sailors. Bush certainly did.Globalisation is absolutely at the heart of neoliberalism, and if Trumps actions meet his pre-election rhetoric, it will be a major shift away from the economic policies of the last forty years. But that is the big question, whether he'll do what he said. His low taxes pledge is perfectly compatible with neolib, but the massive state investment and potential tariff's are very much not. the 'crackdown' on 'illegals' will depend very much on how it is done, the reality will be that actually they wont stop the circulation of human capital too much, because it would be shit for the economy. But that still leaves room for him to come up with something headline grabbing, that wont affect numbers too much, but will be absolutely horrible to one group (while quietly ignoring the majority)
People sometimes point to the founding of the EPA as proof that Nixon wasn't all bad. Yes, he did create the agency, but the truth, as always, is more complex. Rachel Carson deserves most of the credit. She wrote a book called 'Silent Spring', that arguably spawned the environmental movement, or at least gave it a large shot of adrenaline. President Kennedy was the first to begin implementing changes based on her ideas; and Nixon was simply giving in to a cultural backlash that he could ignore only at his peril.
How ‘Silent Spring’ Ignited the Environmental Movement
An eye to the history books perhaps. When all this is over the rest of his party are going to be forever known as collaborationist scum, so best to put some clear blue water between them.So they have! bercow probably only cares about Westminster cos it's his tho
What's it like where you live Yuwipi Woman ? Do you think people who voted for trump are feeling happy and optimistic?
perma-smirk cunt imoSo they have! bercow probably only cares about Westminster cos it's his tho
Do you think there's lots of people protesting who didn't vote or voted 3rd party?I think even the people who voted for him are a little unsure, at least the ones capable of thought. Some people who voted for him, of course, are card carrying racists. They're as happy as pigs in slop.
This is a red state, so liberals are in short supply. They're in all-out, last ditch, freak-out mode, running from protest to protest. If we could have gotten that level of interest before the election, there's no telling how it would have turned out.
Do you think there's lots of people protesting who didn't vote or voted 3rd party?
Why? If there was would it mean something?Do you think there's lots of people protesting who didn't vote or voted 3rd party?
like yes and like no
yes thye want less restriction, no they do not chaos and volatility whipping around that will fuck up their game. Thier support will be temopered to enure there is just enough control to keep both sides happy
I think even the people who voted for him are a little unsure, at least the ones capable of thought. .
I have American relatives who voted for him, and they're pleased as punch. I always figured that they could think at least a little, given that they're mostly medical professionals. [A lot of them are pretty racist, though.]
Well yes Trump represents continuity on Wall St but Mnuchin is a very interesting favourite to reward. His main qualification is being able to use the Federal government as an ATM. It's like a sadly transparent version of American Hustle with worse wigs.all presidents have ex goldmans MD's on staff. there is good reason for that and its not due to the presidents being puppets
A lot of people don't think very much. They try to figure out what their group thinks and then they groupthink along with them. This can be true no matter which side of the line they fall on.
I tried discussing Trump online with some of them - along with other unrelated Trump supporters. Big mistake. The general response to any questions I had or points I had to make, was that I was a 'liberal son of a bitch.'
Some of them have also said the same thing face to face to other of my Canadian relatives.