In that case I am confused. I am sure there will now be some people who say: 'No, it is real!' Hm.
HIGNFY themselves have tweeted the transcript is fake.
In that case I am confused. I am sure there will now be some people who say: 'No, it is real!' Hm.
do your own bloody thread thenShould we not also do a John Peel OBE thread/discussion ? Folk are seemingly letting John Peel off the
hook because he was cooler than Savile and introduced us all to some fantastic music etc..There seems to
be a bit of a Roman Polanski ting going on with Peel, ie lots of folk defending him because of how "great" he was..
..He was a dodgy geezer by his own admission.
in 1974Wasn't he on Clunk Click with Saville?
I heard he was into young beavers.
you're not really keeping abreast of things very wellWhat the fuck has Freddie Starr got to do with this thread?
you're not really keeping abreast of things very well
What the fuck has Freddie Starr got to do with this thread?
how old were you when he gave it you (the autograph) ?I might try ebaying my autograph.
My Dad got it for me. I was about 11 I think, maybe 12.how old were you when he gave it you (the autograph) ?
Given how the other threads have gone, do you think it's a great idea to start talking about Freddie Starr in this thread?Don't you actually read the threads before deleting them?
Given how the other threads have gone, do you think it's a great idea to start talking about Freddie Starr in this thread?
C4 News' Paraic O' Brien (ex-BBC London): Freddie Starr has employed a private investigator to investigate woman who alleges abuse.
https://twitter.com/paraicobrien/status/255765755054944256
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?But your denial of facts which are now in the public domain is morally wrong.
freddie starr's appearance on the news last night was a new high.. appearing alongside his 34 yo wife the 69 year old denied he was attracted to young girls and suggested that as his accuser went to an approved school she shouldn't be believed.
Should we not also do a John Peel OBE thread/discussion ? Folk are seemingly letting John Peel off the
hook because he was cooler than Savile and introduced us all to some fantastic music etc..There seems to
be a bit of a Roman Polanski ting going on with Peel, ie lots of folk defending him because of how "great" he was..
..He was a dodgy geezer by his own admission.
i suggested my wife went to her primary schools halloween party dressed as jimmy saville.
went down as well as you might imagine.
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?
What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?
I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
If they've rolled away the stone, he might come back to life
Your wifes still in primary school? Even sir jim'll went for older girls than that...
He denied he'd met Savile more than twice or appeared on a TV show with him - untrue (proven by footage)In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?
What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?
I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
I was so disappointed when I found out that Starr never really ate anyone's hamster. Perhaps the child abuse rumours are also a publicity story created by Max Clifford. If I read that the latter had eaten a hamster I would probably believe it.In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?
What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?
I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
great song thatI don't want that song in my head
the beeb need to do the inquiry sooner rather than later
I agreeI don't trust them to be totally honest, independent inquiry is what is needed.
by his own admission, he was happy to abuse under age girls. Why do people let him off so easily?Letting Peel off the hook for...marrying a 15 year-old in a state where it was legal to do so? For claiming to have been given blow-jobs by teenage girls? For dressing up as a schoolgirl?
I mean come on, draw the equivalences between the two, if there are any, but otherwise, you're just insinuating that one DJ was as bad as the other.
by his own admission, he was happy to abuse under age girls. Why do people let him off so easily?