Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the sir jimmy savile obe thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Should we not also do a John Peel OBE thread/discussion ? Folk are seemingly letting John Peel off the
hook because he was cooler than Savile and introduced us all to some fantastic music etc..There seems to
be a bit of a Roman Polanski ting going on with Peel, ie lots of folk defending him because of how "great" he was..
..He was a dodgy geezer by his own admission.
do your own bloody thread then
 
Given how the other threads have gone, do you think it's a great idea to start talking about Freddie Starr in this thread?

If you are scared of the consequences of people crossing a certain line that's up to you. But your denial of facts which are now in the public domain is morally wrong.
 
But your denial of facts which are now in the public domain is morally wrong.
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?

What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?

I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
 
freddie starr's appearance on the news last night was a new high.. appearing alongside his 34 yo wife the 69 year old denied he was attracted to young girls and suggested that as his accuser went to an approved school she shouldn't be believed.


Oh, and F/S is from such an esteemed background, not...
 
For the record, I fucking hate Freddie Starr. Dreadful, dreadful man. But I trust people will at least understand why I'm counselling caution here.
 
Should we not also do a John Peel OBE thread/discussion ? Folk are seemingly letting John Peel off the
hook because he was cooler than Savile and introduced us all to some fantastic music etc..There seems to
be a bit of a Roman Polanski ting going on with Peel, ie lots of folk defending him because of how "great" he was..
..He was a dodgy geezer by his own admission.

I vaguely remember the NME in the late seventies every week having a small picture insert of J/P with a naked woman, usually in the bath, not under age though, often baffled as to why it was there...
 
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?

What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?

You questioned the relevance of Starr to this matter. Starr has been unsuccessful in trying to silence the media on the allegations made against him that he was involved in incidents of abuse that also involved Savile. That is factual, cannot be challenged and is highly relevant to any discussion on Savile.

I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.

Okay, fair enough.
 
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?

What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?

I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
He denied he'd met Savile more than twice or appeared on a TV show with him - untrue (proven by footage)
He denied that he'd ever met the woman who is accusing him of assault - as above

Beyond that, no, of course, nothing has been proven - it hasn't gone to court yet.
 
In the "public domain" as in actual proven allegations or chitter chatter and rumours on the web?

What are the facts and proven allegations against Freddie Starr?

I'm actually doing my best to ensure that discussions can take place here.
I was so disappointed when I found out that Starr never really ate anyone's hamster. Perhaps the child abuse rumours are also a publicity story created by Max Clifford. If I read that the latter had eaten a hamster I would probably believe it.
 
Letting Peel off the hook for...marrying a 15 year-old in a state where it was legal to do so? For claiming to have been given blow-jobs by teenage girls? For dressing up as a schoolgirl?

I mean come on, draw the equivalences between the two, if there are any, but otherwise, you're just insinuating that one DJ was as bad as the other.
by his own admission, he was happy to abuse under age girls. Why do people let him off so easily?
 
by his own admission, he was happy to abuse under age girls. Why do people let him off so easily?

I'm not letting him off, I'm asking "where's any abused girl making a complaint, then or now?". Considering that at the time Peel was speaking about, he was living and working in a state where sex with a minor was an automatic jail term if reported, surely if he'd forced his attentions on so many pubescent females there'd be some trace, especially in a litigious culture such as the US has?
I see the smoke, but I'd like to see evidence of the fire too, if that's okay with you. This isn't as cut and dried as Savile, with what currently appear to be several decades of ignored accusations of abuse against him, it's about a bloke who married (legally) a 15 year-old that he thought was older, getting head off of girls who he assumed to be under the age of consent.
That's why I'm not prepared to throw Peel on the same bonfire as Savile yet. If I see evidence that he actually was a predatory paedophile, I'll happily bung him on the bonfire too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom