The Rational Proof of God's Existence

[8ball]

You could, but that is not what I am talking about here. Here I am talking about the most basic form of exchange imaginable--the foundation of exchange if you will. I am talking about the exchange of one kind of object (eg a sheep) for another (eg a cow). Please resist the temptation to get ahead of my argument.

No matter how simple the exchange, value is a component of concept, not something perceptible in a physical body. Perception implies connection with the phycsical, of which there is none here, just internal representation.

Enjoy your holiday.

 

[Jonti]

Yeah, there's an elision of concepts, a sleight-of-hand, here. There is perception, implying connection with the physical; but there is never perception alone, it is always interpreted by somebody in some way.

What is perceived always has meaning for the organism (otherwise the organism wouldn't bother with it). It is the presence of this intrinsic numinous aspect of the sensorium that phildwyer mistakes for a something external and divine.

 

[revol68]

He's on a two week ban as a result of the above.

oh how predictable, hand out a 24hr ban for next to nothing and then once the person inevitably logs in with a different account to see the fall out ban them for 2 weeks.

really quite pathetic.

 

[invisibleplanet]

No matter how simple the exchange, value is a component of concept, not something perceptible in a physical body. Perception implies connection with the phycsical, of which there is none here, just internal representation.

Enjoy your holiday.

why is dwyer using stone age economics to prove the existence of monotheistic deity?

 

[8ball]

why is dwyer using stone age economics to prove the existence of monotheistic deity?

For that you will have to wait two weeks and several days assuming absolutely no objections raised.

 

[Jonti]

One can so understand revolv's impatience and disappointment with the process of prying the wisdom from dwyer

 

[Corax]

Bored now. Shit thread is shit.

 

[revol68]

I reported it. It's obvious cuz I quoted it straight after. Great skills there revol lol

Please show where I said Atomic reported it?

I was making a general point about wankers running to the mods to fight their spats.

 

[5t3IIa]

Please show where I said Atomic reported it?

I was making a general point about wankers running to the mods to fight their spats.

Oh, after another little look I see that you didn't specifically say that AS reported it, no.

You know nothing about my 'spats'.

 

[revol68]

Oh, after another little look I see that you didn't specifically say that AS reported it, no.

You know nothing about my 'spats'.

I know you reported an inane your ma joke.

Dwyer might be a bit of a muppet but he's at least more interesting than you and despite his deist lapse of judgement a damn sight more intelligent.

 

[Jonti]

 

[5t3IIa]

I know you reported an inane your ma joke.

Dwyer might be a bit of a muppet but he's at least more interesting than you and despite his deist lapse of judgement a damn sight more intelligent.

Yes, as I said: you clearly know nothing about me and Dwyer.

 

[revol68]

Yes, as I said: you clearly know nothing about me and Dwyer.

I know what posts I've read of both of youse, Dwyer can be a wind up merhcant and a muppet with his HIV denial shite and his loony theism but he is a damn sight more interesting and in truth intelligent than you.

Oh and he doesn't go running off to the mods like a despicable cunt.

 

[5t3IIa]

I know what posts I've read of both of youse, Dwyer can be a wind up merhcant and a muppet with his HIV denial shite and his loony theism but he is a damn sight more interesting and in truth intelligent than you.

Oh and he doesn't go running off to the mods like a despicable cunt.

Are you thick? I said 'me and Dwyer', not us seperatly

 

[revol68]

Are you thick? I said 'me and Dwyer', not us seperatly

I do know things about you and Dwyer, firstly that you reported his post like a pathetic fuck and secondly that he is more interesting and intelligent than you.

 

[5t3IIa]

OK revol, I'mma let you repeat yourself over and over with no understanding of the facts.

 

[brix]

Oh and he doesn't go running off to the mods like a despicable cunt.

You're completely out of order here. People are entitled to report posts if they feel they need to. It's tough if you don't like it.

 

[revol68]

OK revol, I'mma let you repeat yourself over and over with no understanding of the facts.

What facts justify you running to the mods over a your ma joke aimed at someone else?

 

[5t3IIa]

What facts justify you running to the mods over a your ma joke aimed at someone else?

None of your fucking business, nosey!

 

[revol68]

You're completely out of order here. People are entitled to report posts if they feel they need to. It's tough if you don't like it.

Yes and I'm fre to comment on people reporting posts, especially of the inane your ma type.

There are no doubt situations were posts should be reported but using it the report button as simply a pathetic tool in an online spat is cuntish and if everyone indulged it the site would be a total mess.

 

[brix]

Yes and I'm fre to comment on people reporting posts, especially of the inane your ma type.

There are no doubt situations were posts should be reported but using it the report button as simply a pathetic tool in an online spat is cuntish and if everyone indulged it the site would be a total mess.

You're free to 'comment', I'm free to pull you up on it, people are free to report posts.

 

[revol68]

None of your fucking business, nosey!

Right then I will continue to hold my opinion based on the evidence available to me.

It's a tad retarded to attack someone for not holding all the facts when you are the person withholding them.

 

[TheDave]

Ed wouldn't have give his first ban to Phil if he didn't feel that he deserved it, I doubt he would play along with any personal spat.

 

[5t3IIa]

Right then I will continue to hold my opinion based on the evidence available to me.

It's a tad retarded to attack someone for not holding all the facts when you are the person withholding them.

There are some things we will just never understand revol - you must have faith.

 

[revol68]

You're free to 'comment', I'm free to pull you up on it, people are free to report posts.

Woah, what gripping fucking insight there.

Now that you have put us all straight with your statement of the stupidly obvious maybe you would like to tell us your opinion on people using the report post function in the particular manner 5T3LLA did, y'know as a petty tool in an ongoing spat. Do you think reporting your ma jokes aimed at other other posters is reasonable and workable as a generalised trend?

 

[revol68]

There are some things we will just never understand revol - you must have faith.

Awh bless, you really are in the shadow of Dwyer.

 

[revol68]

Ed wouldn't have give his first ban to Phil if he didn't feel that he deserved it, I doubt he would play along with any personal spat.

Yeah the Editor and moderation on these boards in general is a paragon of objective virtue.

I mean everyone who makes your ma jokes gets a warning.

 

[5t3IIa]

Woah, what gripping fucking insight there.

Now that you have put us all straight with your statement of the stupidly obvious maybe you would like to tell us your opinion on people using the report post function in the particular manner 5T3LLA did, y'know as a petty tool in an ongoing spat. Do you think reporting your ma jokes aimed at other other posters is reasonable and workable as a generalised trend?

A page or two back he got a 'yellow card' for the ma stuff, then posted ma stuff again almost immediately. I was just the first person to spot it and took advantage. No mods played along with any spats, they did what they'd indicated they'd do.

 

[TheDave]

Do you think reporting your ma jokes aimed at other other posters is reasonable and workable as a generalised trend?

Dwyer's comment got reported and as far as I'm concerned posters making comments like "how much does your Mum charge for a blow-job?" in the 'theory, philosophy & history' forum are bang out of order.

The big man laid down the law, as he asserts if this was General I doubt he would have cared but Dwyer was bringing down the tone of this sub-forum and he repeated it after being warned.

 

[revol68]

The big man laid down the law, as he asserts if this was General I doubt he would have cared but Dwyer was bringing down the tone of this sub-forum and he repeated it after being warned.

utter bullshit, there is far worse shit through out this sub forum, Dwyer got warned because he is Dwyer and he annoys a lot of people on here.

I bet El Jefe or pk would never have been warned let alone banned over a silly your ma joke.

And 5T3LLA is a sad fuck reporting it, though not as pathetic as the Editor for going along with it.