Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the long-awaited 'why the telegraph is going downhill' thread

Will be interesting to see the viewing figures if/when he comes back
Probably back to normal, and that would be understandable. Lineker is intelligent & principled enough to avoid saying anything remotely off topic on MOTD. And that’s a major part of the argument for his defence: he has never expressed any political opinion on MOTD, only on his personal social media accounts.
 
Yep a peak for any first episode and drop after that - might attract a few more viewers longer term.

The headline above will read "Lineker viewers plummet on second episode"
 
That the Torygraph is turning increasingly Daily Mailesque in its desperately biased reporting has been obvious for a while. Today they have plumbed yet new depths as they actually attempt to suggest that the indescribably shit and cringeworthy MOTD episode last night was actually an improvement on the usual output :facepalm::D

View attachment 366502

I’m sure for me it would have been no more or less tedious than normal, but I suspect this pundit’s opinion is worth no more than mine on the matter.
 
I wonder if Telegraph hacks and contributors have a private bet going on who can get the most batshit crazy opinion piece published...

View attachment 379968
Not sure how you'd be able to judge who'd won

KmKMnny.png


Britain can still escape the OECD’s radical plan for permanent socialism (archived)
 
Calling any OECD policy "a radical plan for worldwide socialism" isn't just hyperbole, it's full-on batshit. It's like calling the IMF a Marxist front. Anyone saying it should immediately be dismissed as too unserious to be worth further thought. But here we are, or rather here the Telegraph is, not just allowing this drivel to go to print but prominently putting it in headlines.
 
rather a niche piece of knowledge. did you go to harrow to know that, or eton to know it wasn't your auld school?

No, not sure why it's niche either, it's classic George Gilbert Scott. Do you not know anything of London's architecture except in respect of those buildings you have had direct involvement with?
 
No, not sure why it's niche either, it's classic George Gilbert Scott. Do you not know anything of London's architecture except in respect of those buildings you have had direct involvement with?
it's niche because very few other people - myself not among them - have any knowledge of public school library buildings. i'd wager a fiver that no one here except our resident old etonians and harrovians, and of course you, would have spotted the telegraph's error. sure, i've some knowledge of london's architecture. but you've found my limits, it doesn't extend as far as the bastions of the wealthy in northwest london. now, if the picture had been of the shawl near south harrow station or the windermere by south kenton station - why, that's a whole different ballgame
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Sue
I can see it from the office window when I'm attending to on site matters. I can assure you we don't have many, if any, Harrow grads. It's up on a big fucking hill and visible for miles.
 
it's niche because very few other people - myself not among them - have any knowledge of public school library buildings. i'd wager a fiver that no one here except our resident old etonians and harrovians, and of course you, would have spotted the telegraph's error. sure, i've some knowledge of london's architecture. but you've found my limits, it doesn't extend as far as the bastions of the wealthy in northwest london. now, if the picture had been of the shawl near south harrow station or the windermere by south kenton station - why, that's a whole different ballgame

It's probably the most noticeable building on Harrow's High Street. Not the largest, but the eye is drawn to it being set back behind the well-manicured garden, so it invites you to guess its purpose. Someone unfamiliar with the area might easily assume it was where the school was centred, and anyone who has ever travelled along Harrow's High Street would probably recognise it. Likewise anyone has ever gone through Eton, which is very small, having only one through road, would realise that as the pictured building is evidently not a Tudor building, accommodation block or a modern addition, it must be somewhere else. You perhaps don't get out much from your central London bubble, but probably best not to assume that no one else passes by notable buildings on main thoroughfares elsewhere and might consequently recognise them.
 
It's probably the most noticeable building on Harrow's High Street. Not the largest, but the eye is drawn to it being set back behind the well-manicured garden, so it invites you to guess its purpose. Someone unfamiliar with the area might easily assume it was where the school was centred, and anyone who has ever travelled along Harrow's High Street would probably recognise it. Likewise anyone has ever gone through Eton, which is very small, having only one through road, would realise that as the pictured building is evidently not a Tudor building, accommodation block or a modern addition, it must be somewhere else. You perhaps don't get out much from your central London bubble, but probably best not to assume that no one else passes by notable buildings on main thoroughfares elsewhere and might consequently recognise them.
You're making a lot of assumptions there about the level of telegraph readership in harrow
 
Back
Top Bottom