As opposed to today, when nuclear conflict seems impossible?When the Wind Blows and (maybe) The Day After were all necessary products of the 80s when nuclear conflict seemed possible.
Invincible ignorance innit.
As opposed to today, when nuclear conflict seems impossible?When the Wind Blows and (maybe) The Day After were all necessary products of the 80s when nuclear conflict seemed possible.
Our's is the election of a tory governmentRussia will conduct a nationwide test of its emergency public warning systems on Wednesday, blaring out sirens and interrupting television broadcasts to warn the population of an impending danger.
The test, first conducted in 2020, is part of a new initiative that requires authorities to conduct tests twice a year, starting from 1 September, Reuters reports.
It comes, though, amid the war in Ukraine which has triggered the deepest crisis in Russia’s relations with the west since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.
At 10.43am Moscow time (7.43am GMT), sirens will wail and stern announcements demanding “Attention everyone!” will alert the public, mimicking what would happen in a true disaster or catastrophe.
“When you hear the sound of a siren, you need to remain calm and not panic, turn on the TV – any publicly accessible channel or radio – and listen to the information message,” the Ministry of Emergency Situations said in a statement.
“The warning system is designed to timely convey a signal to the population in the event of a threat or emergency of a natural or man-made nature.”
The US is also conducting a large-scale test of its public warning systems on Wednesday, via US mobile phones and TV and radio stations.
The purpose of the US test is to ensure that the systems “continue to be effective in alerting the public to emergencies, particularly at the national level”, the Federal Emergency Management Agency said in a press release.
Many other countries have also conducted alert system tests for crisis and disasters in recent years.
getting people to fuck off when they have parked where their not supposed toTo what?
Fucking Russia pushing the world into this chaos.
There's no one else to blame for the 51 ordinary people slaughtered in a cafe in Ukraine today. Or the multiple war crimes committed by Russia.It's a bit more complicated than that.
There's no one else to blame for the 51 ordinary people slaughtered in a cafe in Ukraine today. Or the multiple war crimes committed by Russia.
Both sides are committing war crimes:
In a war that could have easily been avoided, and should have been.There's no one else to blame for the 51 ordinary people slaughtered in a cafe in Ukraine today. Or the multiple war crimes committed by Russia.
Remind us how many theatres, hospitals, shopping malls and apartment blocks each side has blown up so far?
I've no idea, and neither do you. Truth is the first casualty. But there's no point in trying to pretend that one side is fighting any dirtier than the other. This is war, it don't work like that.
Dwyer is a false flag operation. he’ll say otherwise of course but you can’t trust propaganda.
No, you don't get to decide what I know. I asked a question, a simple one, in response to a claim you made. But now you say you don't know
Agreed. If Russia hadn't invaded Ukraine, this war wouldn't be happening.In a war that could have easily been avoided, and should have been.
You must accept that everyone commits atrocities in wartime. It's impossible to know exactly how many either side is committing, because obviously both sides lie about it. I know that you're not shown Ukrainian atrocities in the UK, but that doesn't mean they don't happen. I've seen loads of Russians executed after surrendering, for example.
It was obvvious that Russia was going to invade if Ukraine continued on the path on which the Maidan coup set it. Nonetheless the west still encouraged Ukraine down that path, while knowing this full well. It was a gamble with Ukrainian lives, and Ukraine isn't going to recover for a long time, if ever.Agreed. If Russia hadn't invaded Ukraine, this war wouldn't be happening.
But most Ukrainians don't want to live under Russian rules. Would you want to live under a regime you hate because it is internationally convenient?It was obvvious that Russia was going to invade if Ukraine continued on the path on which the Maidan coup set it. Nonetheless the west still encouraged Ukraine down that path, while knowing this full well. It was a gamble with Ukrainian lives, and Ukraine isn't going to recover for a long time, if ever.
we do know that both ukraine and russia have done vile things. we also know that russia has done loads more vile things than ukraine. as dwyer says no one comes out of this well. various people, far more reputable than the lamentable dwyer, have said this. i thought we'd basically accepted this was the case ages ago so can we now put it to one side and move on."Loads", right. Of course you have. So is that because you're a human rights lawyer preparing prosecutions, or just because you enjoy watching people get shot in the head? Or have you just made it up?
Oh hold on I forgot, I don't care. I don't believe anything you post because you've shown time and again you're full of shit. Don't even know what you're doing here apart from trying to piss people off.
i don't want to live under the british regime but sadly needs must. and it's not internationally convenient, not for me anywayBut most Ukrainians don't want to live under Russian rules. Would you want to live under a regime you hate because it is internationally convenient?
Shit as it is, that has not occurred through invasion, which was my point.i don't want to live under the british regime but sadly needs must. and it's not internationally convenient, not for me anyway
You say that but the history of the UK has been shaped by a shed load of invasions from at least 43 ce onShit as it is, that has not occurred through invasion, which was my point.
Well the last invasion of the mainland UK was 1797. Or 1940 if you want to include the Channel Islands. So, it is slightly less relevant to people alive today than being invaded in 2022.You say that but the history of the UK has been shaped by a shed load of invasions from at least 43 ce on
i don't want to live under the british regime but sadly needs must. and it's not internationally convenient, not for me anyway
All true enough - war is vile, in itself should be considered a crime. Rightly or wrongly though, I consider killing soldiers who've surrendered - either out of revenge or simply to not use up food or other resources meant for your own troops - as a slightly milder kind of crime than shelling civilians on purpose. We do know Russia has done this in the last couple of years, I don't think we know Ukraine has.Pickman's model said:we do know that both ukraine and russia have done vile things. we also know that russia has done loads more vile things than ukraine. as dwyer says no one comes out of this well. various people, far more reputable than the lamentable dwyer, have said this. i thought we'd basically accepted this was the case ages ago so can we now put it to one side and move on.
What if we were invaded by, say, Norway and they tried to impose greater gender equality, more progressive taxation and a better welfare state? Would you fight back just because it was an invasion?Shit as it is, that has not occurred through invasion, which was my point.
All true enough - war is vile, in itself should be considered a crime. Rightly or wrongly though, I consider killing soldiers who've surrendered - either out of revenge or simply to not use up food or other resources meant for your own troops - as a slightly milder kind of crime than shelling civilians on purpose. We do know Russia has done this in the last couple of years, I don't think we know Ukraine has.
What if we were invaded by, say, Norway and they tried to impose greater gender equality, more progressive taxation and a better welfare state? Would you fight back just because it was an invasion?