Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Dominic Cummings file

Oh dear


Specifically, the documents are understood to allege that Mr Cummings perverted the course of justice with misleading statements about journeys he made to Durham and Barnard Castle in March and April.

They accuse Boris Johnson’s former chief aide and his wife Mary Wakefield of committing multiple breaches of coronavirus regulations by leaving their primary house in London and driving some 270 miles without a reasonable excuse – while both had Covid-19.

and

A survey commissioned by Channel Four suggests the Conservatives would now lose the majority of northern seats they gained at the 2019 election – with many respondents suggesting the actions of Mr Cummings would be one of the reasons why they will probably vote Labour next time round.

:eek:

they'll no doubt have forgotten it by time of next election though.
 
I'm probably missing something. Later on in the thread there's a statement "this is where it gets interesting" but it doesn't appear to. 🤷‍♂️
 
Isn't that the exact thing that Cummings claimed forced him to go to Durham?
From the transcript of his press conference in the Rose Garden:

For years, I have warned of the dangers of pandemics. Last year I wrote about the possible threat of coronaviruses and the urgent need for planning. The truth is, that I had argued for lockdown. I did not oppose it. But these stories had created a very bad atmosphere around my home. I was subject to threats of violence. People came to my house shouting threats. There were posts on social media, encouraging attacks. There were many media reports on TV showing pictures of my house.
I was also worried that given the severity of this emergency, this situation would get worse. And I was worried about the possibility of leaving my wife and child at home all day and off into the night while I worked in No.10. I thought the best thing to do in all the circumstances was to drive to an isolated cottage on my father's farm.
 
What he describes, in one small section at his self-serving press conference, is not "the exact thing", no.
 
Latest unsurprising stuff in the Guardian...

1613409867108.png

Dominic Cummings was instrumental in the process of awarding a government contract without tender to a company run by his “friends”, according to court documents that raise questions about whether the Cabinet Office may have misled the public.

The documents reveal the central role the prime minister’s former chief adviser played in the awarding of the contract to Public First, a research company owned and run by two of his longstanding associates.

Bent bastard.
 
Another group of people that Cummings has pissed off:


ESOMAR condemns uncorroborated allegations made by Mr. Dominic Cummings

16 February 2021

ESOMAR supports Market Research Society-led efforts reasserting research’s commitment to excellence and professionalism
ESOMAR, the global voice of the data, research and insights community, in support of the UK national association, the Market Research Society (MRS) condemning statements made by former advisor to the UK Prime Minister, Mr Dominic Cummings. The erroneous statements risk undermining public trust and confidence without any evidence to substantiate the allegations.
Mr Cummings submitted a statement to the UK High Court as part of the government’s defense for a research contract that was awarded to a particular agency. Widely relayed in the various media including The Times, the FT, the Evening Standard and the BBC in the UK yesterday, the following excerpt from Mr Dominic Cummings statement was quoted in the Guardian and the Independent:
“I knew they would give us honest information unlike many companies in this sector. Very few companies in this field are competent, almost none are very competent, honest and reliable.”

This is an unsubstantiated and misleading statement, and ESOMAR strongly supports its UK partner the Market Research Society (MRS) in refuting the broader sectoral implications from this assertion. The statement from the MRS may be found on their website and was further relayed by the Research Live digital magazine.

"Such statements - made by former top government officials - undermine our sector's proven ability to conduct impartial research which is amongst the few independent measures of the health of our democracies. To seek to devalue skilled professionals' expertise for the sake of one's own personal defense is both uncalled for and dangerous at a time when societies are questioning the very basis of truth," said Finn Raben, Director General of ESOMAR....
 
Concerning the above, I got the article via a tweet from Jolyon Maugham here:



Hmmm he deleted the following tweet but see below for the gist of it

And the following tweet is rather telling. People are quite possibly to afraid to give evidence in court against the government in case it prejudices any possibility of future contracts with them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom