Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Pot noodle filthy?I want a absolutely filthy Brexit
Pot noodle filthy?I want a absolutely filthy Brexit
she's always pushed out on her own as no one else ever wants anything to do with her.
Who told you that?Well, yeah, but not fully in. Don't rely on an EHIC card to fix you when you get ills.
I'm sure there'll be plenty of shit hitting the fan soon enoughI want a absolutely filthy Brexit
the cook, the thief, his wife and her brexiteerI'm sure there'll be plenty of shit hitting the fan soon enough
Not really. What happened was her speech was "leaked" (i.e. on purpose) well in advance, which led to a drop in sterling, giving the currency a chance to recover a little by the time of her speech, meaning journos could say "look! the currency has gone up after her speech!" when in fact the opposite is true if you look over the past few days.On Bloomberg May Sets Out Brexit Vision With Vow to Quit EU Single Market
And that did Sterling some good.
Moneycorp bureaux de change at Gatwick airport are charging £102.69 for €100 — valuing each pound at just 97.4 euro cents.
if only brexit meant news was reported after it had happened instead of us being told someone's going to say something, listening to them saying it and then another day wasted being told what they've said.Not really. What happened was her speech was "leaked" (i.e. on purpose) well in advance, which led to a drop in sterling, giving the currency a chance to recover a little by the time of her speech, meaning journos could say "look! the currency has gone up after her speech!" when in fact the opposite is true if you look over the past few days.
The pound is now worth less than a Euro in some places:
We all will be soon enough.My step mother who had to be medi-vacced from Fuerteventura to Malaga at her expense as they wouldn't treat her there.
She's a forrin tho.
the cook, the thief, his wife and her brexiteer
in the absence of any other answers....Any lexit opinion on the pros/cons of May's statement?
Does it move forward the lexit proposition?
Not really. What happened was her speech was "leaked" (i.e. on purpose) well in advance, which led to a drop in sterling, giving the currency a chance to recover a little by the time of her speech, meaning journos could say "look! the currency has gone up after her speech!" when in fact the opposite is true if you look over the past few days.
The pound is now worth less than a Euro in some places:
Me too. The SNP are focussing for the time being on "protecting Scotland's place in the single market", and although they are a minority administration in Holyrood, the Scottish Parliament has voted in support of that general position. So the Scottish Parliament (not just the SNP) is at odds with May on that.I'm really curious what the Snp are going to do next, and what the mood of the Scottish people is to this.
Well, what is there to follow closely? May's speech yesterday didn't tell us anything we couldn't already have guessed, and what it does tell us is extremely limited in scope. The general public are not dweebs like us, weighing up this phrase and that.I read that theres no chance of SNP going ahead with indyref2 unless all the polling suggests they have a good chance of winning it. If people in Scotland arent following this, and arent yet annoyed about it, then i expect the SNP to go on an immediate campaign footing for the next couple of years and talk down Brexit/talk up Independence with a passion. I do think theres a genuine case to say that Scotland would be particularly hard hit by a hard brexit
True, but the signals from EU negotiators so far seem to offer little hope for a differing Scottish settlement.Speaking from a position of (English) ignorance here ....it strikes me that a couple of factors that might start to swing opinion in Scotland would be if, to spite May, the EU overcame Spanish objections/fears and started to make more positive overtures towards Scottish accession. And if city finance capital showed signs of flight/interest in an EU/Scottish location?
Yep, but if push came to shove, I bet they'd all so subtly hint at it in negotiations with's May's team. Possibly a negotiating position if May cut up nasty about access to the city?True, but the signals from EU negotiators so far seem to offer little hope for a differing Scottish settlement.
Again, I think it's a strong possibility that this has already happened in private. It's a good card in their hand. But then they already have a very strong hand anyway.Yep, but if push came to shove, I bet they'd all so subtly hint at it in negotiations with's May's team. Possibly a negotiating position if May cut up nasty about access to the city?
It would be so easy for them to destabilise the Conservative & Unionist party with one hint of this.Again, I think it's a strong possibility that this has already happened in private. It's a good card in their hand. But then they already have a very strong hand anyway.
But the obvious problem for the nationalists is the order of those events. As per their constitutions, the EU or EFTA require that any applicant entity is a "state".Scottish independence combined with Scotland staying in the EU could be disastrous for London*. For all the talk of relocating the financial centre of Europe to Paris or Cologne (etc.), there is a basic problem that the British workers in the City of London do not want to live in France or Germany, and it is far from clear that the specialist expertise needed by those companies would be found locally in those economies. British workers, however, would be far more amenable to moving to Edinburgh (in many cases would even welcome it). It would be simplicity itself for a financial institution to simply switch to Scotland to stay in the EU and take all its workforce -- who basically are the company -- with it. If Scotland stays part of the UK, I can see London remaining as a if not the major hub for many financial industries. If it secedes, however, I can see it being gutted.
*Obviously, I don't mean "London" the city or social environment, I strictly mean its economic churn.
This is true, so the benefits* to Scotland would not necessarily be immediate. But if Scotland wanted to accede from the UK and join the EU, it seems likely that they could have achieved this in ten years. That's not that long, in the grand scheme of things. In fifteen years, they could transfer the seat of financial power from London to Edinburgh, if they are so minded.But the obvious problem for the nationalists is the order of those events. As per their constitutions, the EU or EFTA require that any applicant entity is a "state".
So any attempt at independence must, by definition, precede accession and represent something of a leap into the unknown...or at least an interregnum indistinguishable from the status of rUK.
It seemed to me early on that Sturgeon was signalling to the City (by which I mean the financial institutions of London) that they wouldn't have to move many if any jobs, just brass plaques. That seemed to me her clear early message to Finance. And if so, it seemed a smart one from her point of view.Scottish independence combined with Scotland staying in the EU could be disastrous for London*. For all the talk of relocating the financial centre of Europe to Paris or Cologne (etc.), there is a basic problem that the British workers in the City of London do not want to live in France or Germany, and it is far from clear that the specialist expertise needed by those companies would be found locally in those economies. British workers, however, would be far more amenable to moving to Edinburgh (in many cases would even welcome it). It would be simplicity itself for a financial institution to simply switch to Scotland to stay in the EU and take all its workforce -- who basically are the company -- with it. If Scotland stays part of the UK, I can see London remaining as a if not the major hub for many financial industries. If it secedes, however, I can see it being gutted.
*Obviously, I don't mean "London" the city or social environment, I strictly mean its economic churn.
If it came to Scotland staying in the UK and the Single Market (though not necessarily the EU), then there is an argument that Scotland is currently a member (and has not voted to leave). So you're right: the order of events is going to be crucial on how Sturgeon plays her hand.But the obvious problem for the nationalists is the order of those events. As per their constitutions, the EU or EFTA require that any applicant entity is a "state".
So any attempt at independence must, by definition, precede accession and represent something of a leap into the unknown...or at least an interregnum indistinguishable from the status of rUK.
I'm starting to get the impression that Theresa May is only in this to make some money on the side through currency speculation.
It seemed to me early on that Sturgeon was signalling to the City (by which I mean the financial institutions of London) that they wouldn't have to move many if any jobs, just brass plaques. That seemed to me her clear early message to Finance. And if so, it seemed a smart one from her point of view.
We don't know the content of the private messages Finance will have been getting from the EU side, but we can be very sure they'll be well appraised.