The 7/7 Report
- Thread starter TAE
- Start date
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Oh for fucks sake, just ban the cunt, do we have to have all this introspective bullshit every time a clearly obsessed conspiranoid pops up???
Ban them permanently, and don't give a fuck what they think, plenty of other websites out there for this deceitful conspiracy bollocks...
Ban them permanently, and don't give a fuck what they think, plenty of other websites out there for this deceitful conspiracy bollocks...
Badger Kitten
oof
I attended a book launch. Is that permitted?
See how easily we can be made to take rumour and gossip for fact? says Prole ( unaware of the irony in her taking this position!)
Prole's mates discussing how to hi-jack Milan Lai's book launch which was atteneded by survivors and the driver of the Piccadilly train.
Includes posts by Prole, who attended said booklaunch.
A report of the loons disrupting the book launch, which Prole attended, and with whom Prole sat. After the meeting, which was repeatedly disrupted by the people with whom Prole was sitting (and whose thread discussing how to disrupt the meeting and pass round leaflets alleging a
''false flag'' operation and exonerating the bombers can be seen above , linked) Prole came up to me with one of the leaflets, and introduced herself . The leaflet was full of conspiracy theories identical to those which Prole espouses on this board and the repeated Prole-phrase ''Release the evidence!'' It included links to the website julyseventh.co.uk - which she co-runs and which she has claimed as her own in a post on this site!
There you go, caught you Prole. Now sod off.
See how easily we can be made to take rumour and gossip for fact? says Prole ( unaware of the irony in her taking this position!)
Prole's mates discussing how to hi-jack Milan Lai's book launch which was atteneded by survivors and the driver of the Piccadilly train.
Includes posts by Prole, who attended said booklaunch.
A report of the loons disrupting the book launch, which Prole attended, and with whom Prole sat. After the meeting, which was repeatedly disrupted by the people with whom Prole was sitting (and whose thread discussing how to disrupt the meeting and pass round leaflets alleging a
''false flag'' operation and exonerating the bombers can be seen above , linked) Prole came up to me with one of the leaflets, and introduced herself . The leaflet was full of conspiracy theories identical to those which Prole espouses on this board and the repeated Prole-phrase ''Release the evidence!'' It included links to the website julyseventh.co.uk - which she co-runs and which she has claimed as her own in a post on this site!
There you go, caught you Prole. Now sod off.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Prole said:
Your own blog details the calls and letters you have sent to officials, slowing up the investigative process - I see you as merely getting in the way of any investigation, and frustrating attempts by survivors who need answers to get to the truth.
Plus you cherrypick the facts to suit your amateur sleuth scenarios, and really your investigative skills are seemingly derived from a Nancy Drew novel.
You're upsetting BK, who has been posting here way before you, and that's enough for me to support your being permanently banned.
Stobart Stopper
Well-Known Member
Prole said:
Best nutter on Urban, ever!Well maybe not as good as Windsor, but pretty close!
Read the official report into 7th July, it's available from the HO website.editor said:
Tanweer is caught on CCTV at 4.54 arguing over change at a service station, he is wearing white tracksuit bottoms.
7.21.54 Tanweer is now wearing dark tracksuit bottoms. There is no explanation for this change at present.
Th white carrier bag in Lindsay's hand can be seen in both the images from 28/6 and 7/7.
Check yesterday's Independent and tell me if you can't see a bar through Khan's head and body (it's very clear in the photo in the official report on p.4)
Badger Kitten
oof
So you have no association and no contact with the campaign group whatsoever, yes?
She is completely part of the disruptive campaign group, see here . She can wriggle all she wants, but the proof is provided in my post above.
She only posts on 7/7 threads and she is part of a group that disrupts book tours, upsets survivors and peddles crap exonerating mass-murderers, so I call her a troll.
She is completely part of the disruptive campaign group, see here . She can wriggle all she wants, but the proof is provided in my post above.
She only posts on 7/7 threads and she is part of a group that disrupts book tours, upsets survivors and peddles crap exonerating mass-murderers, so I call her a troll.
Mornin' all...
Meanwhile the fruitloops have successfully distracted attention from the big, stinking lie (of omission) in the report.
It would be rather relevant to an understanding of the bombers' motivation to know that "al-Qaeda" was originally funded and armed by the USA, either directly or through its pals in Pakistan's ISI, would it not?
But no, they'd rather argue on the basis of:
E2A: What this attention to tiny textual detail and wilful neglect of the world demonstrates is that we have a revival of Mediæval Scholasticism on our hands.
Meanwhile the fruitloops have successfully distracted attention from the big, stinking lie (of omission) in the report.
It would be rather relevant to an understanding of the bombers' motivation to know that "al-Qaeda" was originally funded and armed by the USA, either directly or through its pals in Pakistan's ISI, would it not?
But no, they'd rather argue on the basis of:
- a cut-and-paste of an email from a person who may no longer be contactable, onto a differently-sane website;
- a bald assertion by someone determined to show a conspiracy that it is impossible to get from the entrance of Luton station to the platform in "less than three minutes" - whereas a poster to these boards, who indicated that they started out rather wanting to believe a conspiracy, took the trouble to go to Luton with a stopwatch and time themselves doing it in 1m30.
E2A: What this attention to tiny textual detail and wilful neglect of the world demonstrates is that we have a revival of Mediæval Scholasticism on our hands.
Badger Kitten
oof
Prole said:
You contribute to a thread about hijacking and disrupting a book launch. You attend it with a leaflet peddling conspiracy theories and a link to a site which you run, which you give to me when you introduce yourself. You sit with the people who are heckling and denying that the bombers bombed the trains, the people who plotted to disrupt the meeting and who do, in fact, disrupt it repeatedly. You expect me to think that actually you disapprove of what they did? Oh please. Was it you who heckled ''Rachel needs to get her facts straight''? I can't tell. But to deny you had anything to do with the group who disrupted that meeting is deceitful. You are all over that board and you are part of that group. You sat with them on the row comprised exclsuively of people intending to disrupt the meeting, who handed out the same leaflet as you, with linkes to YOUR site on it.
Or are you denying that now, that some of them have been found to be Holocaust-deniers? And abusive to me and Milan Rai? And have been writing to my father, and leaving comments such as '' Why are you lying - show the proof the bomber blew himself up, you can't, bitch'' on my blog and sending emails to me that contain similar sentiments?
You keep some lovely company, don't you? I suggest you publicly distance yourself from such people and don't attend meetings with them and sit next to them and hand out leaflets with them and post on their websites agreeing with them, if you don't want to be tarred with the same brush.
Deceiful AND cowardly, I see. And pathetic.
Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
editor said:
Look I dont subscribe to these theories (and I generally dont post on them) but it seems some people throw the baby out with the bath water on certain questions which appear on face value worth looking at. The danger is that if people rubbish everything these people have to say that they might miss some important snippets of information.
Your reply to this is a perfect example. There might well be a very good reason to change his trousers (if he did so) but to say he wanted to be "more comfortable" before he blew himself up into a million pieces seems flippant and somewhat irrational.
Badger Kitten
oof
Why? He might have washed himself,to purify himself and put on clean clothes, ready for his journey to Paradise. It makes sense to me. He'd been up since 3am and driven from Leeds in a pair of sweats, more comfortable to change into a fresh pair to meet your maker.
There's lots of frustrations with the narrative, but there is no doubt in my mind that the bombers killed themselves and so many others with home-made suicide bombs.
There's lots of frustrations with the narrative, but there is no doubt in my mind that the bombers killed themselves and so many others with home-made suicide bombs.
editor
hiraethified
I'd say it's slightly more irrational to cite the fact that a bloke changed his trousers after a drive as some sort of evidence of a murderous conspiracy involving hundreds of people and the slaughter of innocents.Barking_Mad said:
I mean, what's the point being made here? So he changed his trousers. So fucking what?!!!
Think Occam's razor.
Badger Kitten
oof
editor said:
Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately the remarks were made a while back so site meter doesn't have the IP anymore, but if they post again with similar shit I'll capture it and send it over for comparison.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Prole said:
Well, it's actually called a "narrative" and not a report, secondly this thread was started to discuss the narrative not drag in all sorts of conspiracy-laden crap to prop up a series of half-baked speculations on CCTV camera footage, the identity of the bombers and their imagined hiding places.
Romanus IV Diogenes was captured by the Seljuk Turks, released and returned to Constantinople where he was deposed and brutally blinded. It happened and there was no CCTV to record it.
Badger Kitten
oof
Similar threads
- Locked
